The methodology will allow the classroom to be a laboratory of experiences where students and teachers can experience from the practice all incorporation of contents. We will apply the Universal Design Learning Process as a session development structure:

• Priority will be given to the reception and creation of links through dynamics that will allow us to find learning in students' previous knowledge. Learning strategies will combine, among others, presentations, visualization and analysis of videos, study cases and readings.
• Theoretical content will be applied through participatory actions such as cooperative work and projects. This will develop critical thinking, and autonomy and will promote collective and social learning.
• Gender perspective will be included in content, methodology and learning activities.
• Learning will be continuously evaluated through the regulation of processes, self-evaluation and co-assessment, in addition to the evaluation obtained through pieces of evidence.

Our teaching approach and assessment procedures may be altered if public health authorities impose restrictions on public gatherings due to COVID-19.

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT

The assessment evidence will be as follows:

Evidence 1: Video of individual tutoring simulation with a secondary school student. Individual evidence (35%). Submission date: January 29th, 2027

Assessment criteria:

• Appropriate justification of the theoretical foundation of the applied techniques.
• Application of holistic techniques focused on strengths, meaning-making, and coherence with the student’s initial situation.
• Inclusion of a gender perspective and, in general, consideration of student diversity.

Evidence 2: Design of a group career guidance action plan. Group evidence (15%). Submission date: March 19th, 2027

Assessment criteria:

• Holistic and knowledge-building perspective.
• Updated content.
• Use of appropriate methodological criteria.
• Systematisation and precision.
• Feasibility of implementation in the intended context.

Evidence 3: Proposal for educational guidance and tutorial action as a universal measure and support for student learning, based on an educational situation. Individual evidence (35%). Submission date: April 16th, 2027

Assessment criteria:

• Knowledge of the meaning and scope of educational guidance and tutorial action as universal support measures.
• Planning of the action proposal structured around a logical relationship between objectives, actions, and evaluation.
• Evaluation of the expected educational response in the short, medium, and long term.

Evidence 4: Analysis of the role of guidance as support for the educational community. Group evidence (15%). Submission date: Maig 21st, 2027.

Assessment criteria:

• Understanding of the leadership functions of the psychopedagogue to promote educational guidance within a team.
• Illustration of educational guidance proposals within the framework of the school’s educational project and its context.
• Evaluation of guidance as a network-based function and service.

SINGLE ASSESSMENT

Single assessment will consist of a written exam (50%) and a personal interview (50%) with the teaching team on the theory and practice of the competencies linked to the module.

Both tests will take place on 21 May, with a resit on 28 May. Both assessments will be conducted in person.

OTHER ASPECTS

• Attendance at in-person sessions is mandatory, and students must attend at least 80% of classes. Failure to comply may result in not passing the course.
• A minimum grade of 5 is required in each evidence to calculate the final average.
• To participate in the retake process, the student must have been previously assessed in activities representing at least two-thirds of the total course grade. The recoverable activities are evidences 1, 2, 3, and 4, which will be handed in 10 days after receiving the grade on the first atempt. The maximum grade for a retake activity is 5.
• If an assessment task is not submitted within the established deadline, it will be recorded as not submitted. The student must contact the lecturer to arrange, if appropriate, a new submission date, which in any case cannot exceed two weeks after the original deadline. This submission will be considered a resubmission and may obtain a maximum grade of 5.
• A student will be considered Not Assessable if they have not submitted assessment evidence representing at least 33% of the total course grade.
• Feedback, returns, or grading of assessment evidence will be provided within a period not exceeding 20 working days.
• It is possible for students retaking the subject to hand in a Synthesis Task.
• The use of Generative Artificial Intelligence is forbidden.
• Ethical commitment to the professional code of ethics is required. Initiative, an attitude compatible with the educational profession, respectful dialogue, kindness, constructive criticism, argumentation and active participation, rigorous autonomous work, solution-oriented assertive feedback, and appropriate use of electronic devices will be essential throughout all sessions.
• To pass the course, students must demonstrate good overall communicative competence, both oral and written, and a good command of the languages of instruction specified in the course syllabus. In all activities (individual and group), linguistic accuracy, writing quality, and formal presentation will be taken into account. Students must express themselves fluently and correctly and demonstrate a high level of understanding of academic texts. An activity may be returned (not assessed) or failed if the lecturer considers that it does not meet these requirements.
• In accordance with UAB regulations, plagiarism or copying of any written assignment or exam will be penalised with a grade of zero for that evidence, with no possibility of recovery. Regarding the use of Artificial Intelligence, this course does not allow it. If its use is detected, the student will fail the related evaluation evidence.