The methodology is neo-Socratic, that is: the generation and transfer of knowledge from the claiming of the training potential of both students and teachers in a reverse teaching dynamic. This methodology will be developed both in the classroom and in the Peripatetics, a teaching project that consists of routes around the UAB campus where we will discuss the texts of the week. Classes in the classroom and the Peripatetics will alternate according to the Teaching Calendar, which will be presented at the beginning of the course; The Peripatetics will take place mostly on Fridays, and will be open to twenty people from the Faculty who are studying other degrees or belong to other groups https://www.uab.cat/ca/lletres/filosifia-peripatetiques, The guided activities consist of teaching sessions (in the classroom and in the Peripatetics) with a high incentive to participation, the forms of which will be agreed upon at the beginning of the course. The supervised activities are formed by the exercise of the aesthetic sense. Likewise, contributions to the written and podcast tests will be supervised activities, as well as visits to museums and art centers recommended at the beginning of the course and in the attempt that the discursive praxis accompanies a creative praxis according to the procedures of applied aesthetics. Also by a tutoring program in microgroups and individuals. The autonomous activities have as their essential reference the reading of and conceptual and application work on the assessable texts. In this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is allowed as an integral part of the development of the work, provided that the final result reflects a significant contribution of the student in the analysis and personal reflection. The student must clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final result of the activity. The lack of transparency in the use of AI will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may lead to a penalty in the grade of the activity, or greater sanctions in cases of seriousness Note: 15 minutes of a class will be reserved, within the calendar established by the center/degree, for students to complete the surveys to evaluate the performance of the teaching staff and to evaluate the subject.

Evaluation The three tests will be delivered on the virtual campus. The teacher will post a guideline for each one a week before delivery. To do it, the student will have chosen a creative practice -their own or someone else's-, which will be maintained throughout the course. The objective is to learn to write philosophically about an aesthetic object or fact. The student may choose to include their own aesthetic practices that are linked to their writing (photography, music, dance, illustration, painting, and others; any creative practice); this will in no way mean a higher grade.

The teaching calendar will be available on the virtual campus, and will include the review week and the exam week, if the Department's Teaching Committee agrees to establish them.

Rubrics and maximum score Relevant selection of topics to be discussed in the approach to the main questions of the philosophy of art based on a work or other aesthetic reference, 2 points Demonstration of understanding of the contents worked on in the sessions and the mandatory readings, 2 points Clarity and coherence of arguments, 1 point Appropriate use of specific vocabulary linked to the subject, 1 point Correction of written expression and orality in the podcast, 1 point Capacity for discussion with the group about the texts worked on or other forms of participation agreed at the beginning of the course, 1 point Audacity in the appropriation of the contents (sapere aude), understood as the capacity to make them one's own and to develop, from them, a critical reflection situated in the exercise of philosophy as a creative activity, 2 points

PLAGIA Plagiarism would give rise to careful work on formative awareness. It is worth noting that the regulations in this regard state: "In the event that the student commits any irregularity that could lead to a significant variation in the grade of an assessment, this assessment will be graded 0, regardless of the disciplinary process that may be instructed. In the event that several irregularities occur in the assessment acts of the same subject, the final grade for this subject will be 0". REVIEWS The review of each test will be carried out during the usual office hours in the period between this and the following test. The ordinary global review of the subject will be carried out on a specific day that will be indicated in January, and will be in office B 7-112. At the time of carrying out each assessment activity, the teacher will inform the students (Moodle) of the procedure and date of the review of the grades.

RECOVERY Recovery, with a date and place set by the Faculty, is reserved for students who have not taken one of the three tests (being mandatory to take 2/3) or who do not have a final grade of 5. The work to be done by each student towards recovery will be tutored .

ERASMUS Erasmus students who request to advance an exam must present the teacher with a document from their home university justifying their request.

SINGLE EVALUATION The single evaluation will be organized based on three tests that will take place on the same day. The evidence for each test is as follows: Exercise 1 and 2. Two articles (block 1 and block 2 respectively) delivered digitally from the student's institutional mail. For the first test, the student will have chosen a creative practice - their own or someone else's - that they will try to maintain in the three tests. The objective is to learn to write philosophically about an artistic event. The tests will be sent to students by email one week before the test. Weighting: Test 1: 30% of the final grade; Test 2: 30% of the final grade. Exercise 3: make a podcast as an ignorant teacher from the third block. 40% of the final grade. The three exercises will be submitted on the same day at the end of the semester, to be agreed with the teacher. The same recovery system will be applied as with continuous assessment The student will be a non-evaluable student when they have not been able to provide sufficient evidence of assessment and/or when they have not appeared for one, two or three tests.