The subject will be taught using two teaching modalities:

1. Theory: this modality includes expository master classes, activities and group discussions. In order to encourage class attendance and participation, activities may be proposed that, through their participation, may add up to 1 extra point to the final assessment of the subject.
2. Seminars: this modality includes the resolution of cases in small groups, as well as oral presentations by students, review of evidence and discussions. During seminar hours, space and time will be provided to develop the proposed assessment activities. The defense of these activities will take place during the planned seminar sessions.

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

1.- Exam. It represents 40% of the final grade. It is an exam with test questions and / or short answer questions that includes the contents worked on in all the teaching activities of the subject.

2.- Seminar activities: it represents 60% of the final grade. In the seminars, 3 different activities will be carried out and evaluated:

2.1.- Completion and oral defense of works: It represents 20% of the final grade. Resolution of a practical case through the group presentation of a theoretical work. It will be evaluated using a rubric designed for this purpose. The ability to identify and prioritize problems, literature review, intervention-evaluation proposal and academic writing will be evaluated fundamentally. Jobs will not be accepted outside the established period.

2.2.- Body mapping activity: it represents 20% of the final grade grade. Preparation of a plastic work where the students will have to illustrate the contents worked in the theoretical classes applied to the practical case worked previously.

2.3.- Sexuality activity in audiovisual media: it represents 20% of the final grade. Exhibition of 3-4 images related to the case worked, and that allow to explain key aspects of it. The images will be accompanied by a summary explanatory text.

At the discretion of the teacher responsible for the subject in each teaching unit, activities will be carried out to promote attendance and participation in the theoretical classes. These activities will not be scheduled on the calendar and will not require prior preparation. Those students who participate in these activities can obtain up to 1 extra point in the final evaluation of the subject.

Any sign of academic dishonesty, such as plagiarism or manipulation of assessment documents, etc., or any discriminatory, violent or disrespectful attitude towards classmates and/or teachers, may mean the immediate suspension of the subject. In case of suspicion and/or confirmation, the degree coordinator will be informed.

OBTAINING THE FINAL GRADE:

The requirement for obtaining the final grade is to have been presented to all the evaluative parts and to have obtained in each of them a grade greater than or equal to 5.

The evaluation of the activities proposed in the seminar sessions will be evaluated within the same sessions. In case of absence of one of the members of the group, it will be this person who will have to recover the evaluated activity lost in the recovery session. If it is a justified absence, the mark obtained in the recovery test will be maintained. In case of unjustified absence, the maximum grade obtained will be 5. If it is the whole group that does not evaluate an activity, you can do this activity on the day of the exam without prejudice to the final grade.

The final grade of the subject will be the sum of the different parts that make it up. According to agreement 4.4 of the Governing Council 17/11/2010 of the evaluation regulations, the qualifications will be:

From 0 to 4.9 Suspended

From 5.0 to 6.9 Approved

From 7.0 to 8.9 Notable

From 9.0 to 10 · Excellent

From 9.0 to 10 ' Distinction

Students have the right to review the assessment tests. For this purpose, the date will be specified in Moodle.

It will be understood as non-evaluable that student who has not submitted to any or any of the evaluation activities.

Students who have not passed the subject through continuous assessment may take a recovery test. The reassessment test will be only of that suspended part (not of the total of the subject). To participate in the recovery, the students must have been previously evaluated in a set of activities whose weight equals to a minimum of two thirds of the total grade of the subject (article 112 ter. UAB evaluation regulations). The maximum grade that will be obtained from the recovery test will be a 5, which will average with the rest of the evaluation activities.

Special and particular situations will be assessed by the subject coordinator and the group tutor.

All evaluation tools will be available in Moodle at the beginning of the course.

To be eligible for honors, you must have attended/participated in the proposed extracurricular activities linked to the subject during the semester. If there are no activities of this type, attendance and participation in class will be valued.

Absences:

The following situations are considered justified absences:

Official exam

Acute disease

Specialized medical visit

Competition of elite athletes (not training)

Death of a relative or close person

The performance of any irregularity in an evaluation act (academic fraud, plagiarism or improper use of AI, unless this use is expressly authorized by the teaching guide), which may lead to a significant variation in the grade, assumes that this act will be graded with a 0. In the event that the teaching guide foresees that in order to pass the subject it is an essential requirement to have obtained a minimum grade in this evaluation act or that there are several irregularities in the evaluation acts of the same subject, the final grade of this subject is 0. Apart from this, a disciplinary process may be instructed to the student that incurs any of these irregularities.

Note: This subject does not provide the system for single assessment

USE OF AI

For this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is allowed exclusively in translation and / or improvement of the quality of the text of the seminar work, as well as to improve the quality of the presentations. The student will have to clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final result of the activity. The non-transparency of the use of AI in this evaluable activity will be considered lack of academic honesty and may lead to a partial or total penalty in the grade of the activity, or greater penalties in cases of severity.