Logo

Academic Writing Seminar

Code: 107231
Credits: 6
2026/2027
Degree programme Type Course
Social and Cultural Anthropology FB 1

Contact lecturer

Name :
Ferran Torra Portell
Email :
ferran.torra@uab.cat

Group languages

You can consult this information at the end of the document.

Prerequisites

It is necessary for students to demonstrate a level of Spanish and/or Catalan equivalent to C1 in order to follow the contents of the subject.

Objectives

In order to deepen the training in the instrumental use of the Catalan language and the Spanish language in technical and scientific writing, strategies for writing specialized texts in a clear, correct and
appropriate manner for each circumstance will be discussed , subject and discipline. Special attention will be paid to the various textual typologies, to the stages of text elaboration and to the properties
that characterize quality writing.

Learning outcomes

  • CM04 (Draft academic documents in the field of anthropology.) Draft academic documents in the field of anthropology.
  • CM05 (Use academic communication strategies appropriately in the transmission of information in the anthropological field.) Use academic communication strategies appropriately in the transmission of information in the anthropological field.
  • KM05 (Identify the basic narrative tools (argumentative and textual) in the construction of a text or anthropological and/or ethnographic material.) Identify the basic narrative tools (argumentative and textual) in the construction of a text or anthropological and/or ethnographic material.
  • SM05 (Produce texts that are correct and appropriate to the academic register.) Produce texts that are correct and appropriate to the academic register.
  • SM06 (Apply argumentative, textual and analytical procedures effectively and appropriately in formal and scientific texts.) Apply argumentative, textual and analytical procedures effectively and appropriately in formal and scientific texts.
  • SM07 (Use appropriate terminology in the construction of an academic text in anthropology.) Use appropriate terminology in the construction of an academic text in anthropology.

Contents

1. STRATEGIES FOR WRITING ACADEMIC TEXTS
1.1 The objectives.
1.2. The planning
1.3. The stages of writing.
1.4 The review.
1.5. The instruments and the resources.
2. PRAGMATICS AND ACADEMIC TEXTUAL TYPE
2.1. Genre and register. Adequacy, style and conventions. Specialty languages.
2.2. The voices of the discourse (points of view and impersonalization).
2.3. The exhibition: Definition, criticism, analogy, reformulation, summary and controversy.
2.4. Argumentation: Structure of argumentative texts and rhetorical figures.
2.5. The review and review. The criticism the essay
2.6. Research works: theses, TFM, projects and work proposals.
3. THE STRUCTURE OF THE WRITTEN TEXT
3.1. The organization of the text. Macrostructure.
3.2. Textual cohesion and coherence.
3.3. Discursive connectors. Other textual consistency procedures.
3.4. The microstructure: punctuation, connectors and parentheses.
3.5. Anaphoric and dictic relations. Internal and external references.
4. GRAMMATICAL COMPETENCE
4.1. Word order and communicative value of the parts of the text. Theme, rhyme, focus and emphasis.
4.2. Predicative structure: verbs, subject and complements.
4.3. The structure of the fragment and the paragraph. The adequacy and good formation of complex sentences.

Learning activities and methodology

Title Hours ECTS Learning outcomes
preparation of examens and essays 71.5 2.86
tutorial 21 0.84
Theoretical and practice 50 2
The theoretical explanations by the teaching staff and the performance of activities by the students will be combined. The concepts listed in points 1 and 2 of the contents are of a general nature and applicable
to the two languages in which this subject is taught. The rest of the content points, on the other hand, will be covered by activities in which the students will develop a series of resources of a rhetorical and
grammatical nature that will allow them to write academic texts in the two languages that are the subject of the subject, which are those in which with all probability the student's professional life will develop.15 minutes of a class will be set aside, within the calendar established by the center/degree, for students to fill in surveys to evaluate the performance of the teaching staff and to evaluate the subject.
Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

Assessment

Continuous assessment activities

Title Weight Hours ECTS Learning outcomes
Deliveries 30% 3 0.12 CM04
Final written text 50% 3 0.12 CM04, CM05, KM05, SM05, SM06, SM07
Participation and activities 20% 1.5 0.06 CM04, CM05, KM05, SM05, SM06, SM07

The continuous assessment of the course will comprise the following components:

  • Exercises and participation: 20% (Specific academic writing exercises will be carried out as the theoretical aspects of the course are progressively addressed.)
  • Submitted assignments: 30% (The preparation, based on a draft, of two texts: one argumentative and one expository.)
  • Final written examination: 50% (This will consist of the preparation, in the classroom, of a text — either argumentative or expository — following all the guidelines for writing an academic text.)


The final mark will be obtained from the weighted sum of the scores achieved in the various assessment tasks.

The dates of the assessment tasks will be announced at the beginning of the course, and the submission deadlines for the exercises will be scheduled and announced through the Moodle classroom.

Resit assessment of the course will be available provided that the average mark is higher than 3.5.


Should a student commit any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the mark awarded for an assessment task, that assessment task will be graded with a 0, irrespective of any disciplinary proceedings that may be initiated. If several irregularities occur across the assessment tasks, the final mark for this course will be 0.

In order to pass the course, a student must obtain a minimum final mark of 5 out of 10. The minimum pass mark is 5.


At the beginning of the course, a schedule will be provided setting out the dates for completing and submitting the assessment activities. At the time each assessment activity is carried out, the teaching staff will inform students, through the Virtual Campus, of the procedure and the date for reviewing the marks.


Grade of “Not Assessable”

A student will receive the grade of “Not Assessable” whenever the assessment activities they have completed or submitted represent 30% or less of the final mark for the course.


Resit Assessment

Students who have failed the course may take the resit assessment provided that they meet the criteria to be assessable and have obtained a minimum final average mark of 3.5 out of 10.

All course content will be subject to resit assessment, as the resit will consist of preparing a text (argumentative or expository) once again, in order to demonstrate that students who are required to take the resit have mastered all the textual aspects of an academic text. The resit assessment will be held in person.

Assessment activities in which an academic irregularity has occurred may not be resat.


Irregularities in Assessment Activities

Should a student commit any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the mark awarded for an assessment task, that task will be graded with a 0, irrespective of any disciplinary proceedings that may be initiated. Should several irregularities occur in the assessment tasks of the same course, the final mark for the course will be 0.


Use of Artificial Intelligence

The use of artificial intelligence is strictly prohibited, as the aim of this course is for students to be able to produce texts independently.


Single Assessment

This course does not offer the single-assessment system.


Exchange Students

Exchange students who request to sit an assessment task earlier than scheduled must submit to the teaching staff a written document from their home university justifying the request.


Bibliography

The basic bibliography that the teachers of the subject will complete during the development of the program is indicated:


CASSANY, Daniel (1993), La cuina de l'escriptura, Barcelona, Empúries.

CASSANY, Daniel (2007), Esmolar l'eina: Guia de redacció per professionals, Barcelona, Empúries.

IEC (2016), Gramàtica de la lengua catalana, Barcelona, IEC.

CALSAMIGLIA, Helena; TUSÓN, Amparo (1999), Las cosas del decir, Barcelona, Ariel.

MONTOLÍO, Estrella (2014), Manual de escritura académica y profesional, vol. (I y II), Barcelona, Ariel.

REAL ACADEMIA ESPAÑOLA (2009), Nueva Gramática de la lengua española, Madrid, Espasa.

REYES, Graciela (1998), \"Registros, estilos y tipos de textos\", en Cómo escribir bien en español, Madrid, Arco Libros, pp. 47-80.


Software

It is not necessary

Course groups and languages

The information provided is provisional until November 30. After this date, you will be able to consult the language of each group through this link. To access the information, you will need to enter the course CODE

Type of teaching Group Language Semester Shift
(TE) Theory 1 Catalan/Spanish second semester morning-mixed
(PAUL) Classroom practices 1 Catalan/Spanish second semester morning-mixed
(TE) Theory 2 Catalan/Spanish second semester morning-mixed
(PAUL) Classroom practices 2 Catalan/Spanish second semester morning-mixed