The methodology includes:

• Participatory master classes
• Directed readings and critical debates
• Analysis of cartographic, audiovisual and academic materials with gender perspective
• Individual and group tutorials
• Challenge-Based Learning (CBL): preparation of a narrative/cartographic project that responds to the challenge "How could we make visible the knowledge of women from the Global South in order to contribute to more just and sustainable urban systems?"

The challenge (CBL) will structure the entire semester and provide meaning to the contents and activities.

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT

The continuous evaluation is structured as follows:

• Theoretical tests (40%) consisting of:
• A theoretical exam (30%).
• Elaborating a glossary of essential concepts (10%).
• Autonomous activities (30%) concentrated on a semester-long group project that structures the content of the subject (CBL).This project will be delivered via Moodle and also presented orally in front of the class.
• Two classroom activities (10% each, 20% in total). They are not mandatory, but not doing them implies not having this part of the evaluation. Attendance is mandatory to be able to deliver these activities.
• Teamwork abilities, participation in the peer assessment and active participation in class (10%)

The dates and content of the different evaluation activities will be specified on the first day of class.

On carrying out each evaluation activity, students will be informed (via Moodle) of the procedures to be followed for reviewing all grades awarded, and the date on which such a review will take place.

SINGLE ASSESSMENT

To be eligible for the single assessment, the application must be made within the established deadlines. The information can be found on the faculty's website and will be explained on the first day of class.

The single assessment provides for a single delivery date for all assessment evidences.

Students in single assessment must carry out similar evaluation activities, although they will be conducted individually:

• Theoretical tests (40%) consisting of:
• A theoretical exam (30%).
• Elaborating a glossary of essential concepts (10%).
• Autonomous activities (30%) concentrated on a semester-long project that structures the content of the subject (CBL).This project will be delivered via Moodle and also presented in a video.
• Two classroom activities (10% each, 20% in total). These activities are mandatory to single evaluation students so they can have access to the recovery process. Attendance is mandatory to be able to deliver these activities.
• Autonomous work abilities under supervision, implementation of the received feedback and the participation in, at least, two tutorials during the semester that must happen before 15 December (10%)

RECOVERY GUIDELINES

• To participate in the recovery, the students must have been previously evaluated in a set of activities whose weight equal to a minimum of 2/3 parts of the total grade (CONTINUOUS EVALUATION) or delivered all the evaluation activities (SINGLE EVALUATION).
• To participate in the recovery process, the student must have obtained a minimum grade of 3.5 in the average of the subject.
• The oral presentation and tasks related to daily teaching activity are excluded from the recovery process.
• The same recovery system will be applied for single assessment as for continuous assessment.

OTHER INFORMATION

NOT EVALUABLE: Students will obtain a Not assessed/Not submitted course grade unless they have submitted more than 30% of the assessment items.

ERASMUS: Erasmus students who request to advance an exam must submit to the teacher a written document from their home university that justifies their application.

COPY AND PLAGIARISM: In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for this activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.

USE OF AI:

Due to the impossibility of forbidding the use of AI technologies, this subject allows it exclusively for bibliographic or content-based searches, text correction or translations. It is explicitly requested to avoid its use especially in the creative phase of projects (brainstorming, decision making, etc.) in order to exercise the students' creative capacities, autonomy and critical thinking, as well as strengthen their confidence in their own capacities.

In case the student uses it -for any of the admitted purposes- they must clearly (i) identify which parts have been generated using AI technology; (ii) specify the tools used; and (iii) include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and final outcome of the activity.

Lack of transparency regarding the use of AI in the assessed activity will be considered academic dishonesty; the corresponding grade may be lowered, or the work may even be awarded a zero. In cases of greater infringement, more serious action may be taken.