The different learning methodologies make up both the theoretical content and the skills related to critical thinking in the decision-making nursing process in the health-illness-attention process.

Theory will provide all the necessary basic content in order to be successful in the rest of the teaching methodologies.

The classroom practices will include:

1. The planning of a search in scientific databases based on a qualitative research question
2. Critical analysis of qualitative methodology.

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

Continuous evaluation

The evaluation tests are:

1) Proves objectives:

a) A typical test exam will evaluate the theory. It will have a weight of 35%.

b) A typical test exam is where questions will be asked about an original article that will be presented in advance on Moodle, and that will take time to print out on the day of the exam. It will have a weight of 35%.

2) Presentation of papers: each group of seminarians will deliver, at the end of the seminars, a written paper on the application of qualitative research methodology that they will present to the classroom (30%).

Final note:

The final qualification of the subject is the weighted average of each series of evaluative activities.

The final qualification of the subject is the weighted average of the assessment activities, provided that the grade for each of these activities remains equal to or greater than 4.

In cases where any of the assessment activities remains lower than 4, the resulting numerical grade will be obtained with less value, and the subject will subtract its weight.

Evaluation criteria:

All assessment activities are mandatory. In case of not presenting it without justification, it will be qualified as Not Assessable (NA), and it will be quantified as zero (0), the rest of the subject is failed.

Definition of NOT ASSESSABLE: Not Assessable (NA) will be understood as a situation in which the student does NOT attend 50% or more of the assessment activities.

Students who have not passed the subject through continuous assessment may take a retake test as long as the student has been evaluated for the third part of the total qualification for the subject.

To pass the subject, you must obtain a minimum of 5.0 in the final grade; you will be subject to recovery.

Recovery:

Students who have not passed the subject through continuous assessment may take a retake test as long as the student has been evaluated for the third part of the total qualification for the subject.

The recovery test includes the entire syllabus of the subject and the learning of the seminars, including a typical test exam to recovery the entire subject. You may ask about another original article that will be printed on exam day.

The recovery grade will be the final grade of the subject; it will not be promoted in any case with the rest of the evaluative activities.

You must obtain a minimum of 5.0 on the remedial exam to pass the subject.

Proof Review: All students have the opportunity to review the evaluation proofs by prior appointment with the professor. The review will consist of an individual tutorial along with feedback from the student in relation to the evaluation.

This subject does not foresee a single evaluation system

AI Uses: For this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted exclusively in tasks supporting the correction of texts or translations or the realisation of audiovisual support. The use of AI in support tasks such as bibliographic or information fencing or any other connection generation tasks is prohibited. The student must clearly identify which parts have been generated by this technology, specify the aspects, including a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final result of the activity and reference them (as specified in the bibliography). The non-transparency of the use of AI in this evaluable activity is considered a lack of academic honesty and may entail a total penalty in the activity grade, or major sanctions in serious cases.