The planned type of teaching for the subject will be face-to-face. Approximately 70% of the teaching activity will be dedicated to Topics 1 to 7 (Company Valuation), while, in parallel, the other 30% f will be dedicated to Topic 8 (Management Simulation). Regarding Topics 1 to 7, there will be a theoretical half and a practical half. The theoretical part is based on lectures with the help of audiovisual resources and readings. The practical part is based on solving exercises in the classroom and analyzing cases. Part of the student's work is autonomous and is based on preparing assignments and carrying out specific cases on the content of Topics 1 to 7. Regarding Topic 8, students, distributed in teams, will manage a large industrial company in conditions of competition between them, where they will put into practice the knowledge acquired throughout the degree and work on skills such as analytical skills, decision-making and teamwork.

For this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is allowed in support tasks, such as bibliographic or information searches, correction of texts or translations. The student will have to clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used and include a critical reflection on how they have influenced the process and the final result of the activity. The non-transparency of the use of AI in this assessable activity will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may lead to a partial or total penalty in the grade of the activity, or greater sanctions in cases of severity.

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

The completion of assessment activities is subject to the provisions set out in this course guide and in the "Policy of the School of Economics and Business on the Detection of Irregularities during Assessment Activities", which regulates the conditions under which assessment tasks are conducted and the procedures applicable in cases where indications of irregularities are detected. Students are encouraged to consult the policy.

This subject/module does not offer the option for comprehensive evaluation.

The final grade of the course will be made up of the weighted average of three grades:

1. Evaluation activity. In the middle of the course there will be a test on the contents developed of the topics 1 to 7 of the subject. The grade will represent 30% of the final grade of the course. This test will be liberating for students who obtain a grade of 5 or higher.
2. Follow-up activities: simulation workshop: The part of the subject related to simulation will have a weight of 30% in the final grade of the course. This part may be released if a grade of 5 or higher is obtained. The evaluation of the monitoring activities will be composed of:
3. Test on simulation materials 5%
4. Implementation of the Strategic Plan 20%
5. Final Management Report 25%
6. Net result of the simulation 50%.
7. Exam at the end: The student will be evaluated based on the contents of the second part of the course developed from the topics of the subject, who can pass it if they obtain a grade of 5 or higher. In this case, the exam grade will represent 40% of the final grade of the course. On the same date as the final exam, an additional test will be taken for students who have passed the evaluation activity of the previous point. This will be exceeded if a grade equal to or greater than 5 is obtained.

To pass the subject, it is necessary to obtain a minimum grade of 5 in the weighted average of the three notes that form the course evaluation (see points 1, 2 and 3 above).To make this weighted average, it is essential that the three previous notes are greater than 5 each.

If the weighted average mentioned in the previous point is lower than 3,5, the student will have to repeat the subject next year. Otherwise the student can accomplish the recovery process described below (Retake Process).

A student is considered \"Not evaluable\" to the subject as long as he has not participated in any of the assessment activities. Therefore, it is considered that if a student does any part of the activities of course evaluation cited above, can no longer opt for a \"Not evaluable\".

Calendar of evaluation activities

The dates of the evaluation activities (exercises, assignments ...) will be announced well in advance during the semester.

The dates of the midterm and final exams are scheduled in the assessment calendar of the Faculty.

\"The dates of evaluation activities cannot be modified, unless there is an exceptional and duly justified reason why an evaluation activity cannot be carried out. In this case, the degree coordinator will contact both the teaching staff and the affected student, and a new date will be scheduled within the same academic period to make up for the missed evaluation activity.\"Section 1 of Article 115. Calendar of evaluation activities (Academic Regulations UAB).Students of the Faculty of Economics and Business, who in accordance with the previous paragraph need to change an evaluation activity date must process the request by filling out an Application for exams' rescheduleat

https://eformularis.uab.cat/group/deganat_feie/nou-reprogramacio-de-proves

Grade revision process

After all grading activities have ended students will be informed of the date and way in which the course grades will be published. Students will be also be informed of the procedure, place, date and time of grade revision following University regulations.

Retake Process

\"To be eligible to participate in the retake process, it is required for students to have been previously been evaluated for at least two thirds of the total evaluation activities of the subject.\" Section 3 of Article 112 ter. The recovery (UAB Academic Regulations).Additionally, it is required that the student to have achieved an average grade of the subject between 3.5 and 4.8.

The date of the retake exam is posted in the calendar of evaluation activities of the Faculty. Students taking this exam and passing will get a grade of 5 for the subject. For the students that do not pass the retake, the grade will remain unchanged, and hence, will fail the course.

Use of AI

For this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is allowed exclusively in bibliographic or information search, text correction or translation tasks. The student will have to clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used and include a critical reflection onhow they have influenced the process and the final result of the activity. Lack of transparency in the use of AI in this assessable activity will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may result in a partial or total penalty in the grade of the activity, or greater penalties in cases of seriousness.

Irregularities in evaluation activities

Despite other disciplinary measures deemed appropriate, and in accordance with current academic regulations, \"whenever a student makes any irregularity that could lead to a significant variation in the grade of an evaluation activity, it will be graded with a 0, regardless of the disciplinary process that can be instructed. In case of occurrence of various irregularities in the evaluation of the same subject, the final grade of this subject will be 0\". Section 10 of Article 116. Results of the evaluation. (UAB Academic Regulations).