Students will acquire knowledge and skills through three main methods: theory classes, gammification and practical sessions in the faculty’s audiovisual laboratories. Tutorials will be held at pre-arranged times, both to answer queries on theoretical concepts and to monitor progress with practical work.

The course content will take into account issues relating to gender perspective and the use of inclusive language.

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

This course does not involve a single assessment.

The subject consists of three assessment activities:

1. Theoretical exam with a weight of 50% on the final grade.
2. Practicals with a weight of 40% on the final grade.
3. Active participation with a weight of 10% on the final grade. (Active participation is understood as an active behavior of questions, comments and interaction within the classroom or laboratories. Specifically, interactivity and collaboration are expected in gamification activities).

The final grade for the subject will be obtained from the weighted sum of the three types of assessment activities, bearing in mind that:

• A minimum grade of 5 out of 10 points must be obtained in the theoretical exam.
• Have attended all the practical sessions. Only duly justified absences are accepted.

Retake course:

Students will have the right to retake the subject if they have been assessed in 2/3 of the subject assessment activities (theory, practice and/or participation).

In this sense, the average between the grades achieved must be at least 3.5pts/10 to be able to exercise their right to retake.

Practices and active participation are excluded from retake because they correspond to continuous learning activities linked to the regular participation of students, the progressive development of skills and the practical application of the contents in face-to-face contexts. Their nature does not allow them to be replaced by a retake test.

Retake will consist of an exam on the theoretical contents of the subject. The grade obtained will replace the grade of the initial exam for the purposes of calculating the final grade.

Non-assessable

Students who have not completed at least 33% of the assessment activities planned for the subject will be considered as 'non-assessable' and will therefore be included in the final grade for the subject.

Second enrollment

In the case of a second enrollment, a synthesis exam is not offered. Students must follow the evaluation criteria specified in this course guide.

Artificial Inteligence

In this module, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted exclusively for specific tasks to be determined and communicated by the teaching staff in due course.

Students must clearly identify which parts have been generated using this technology, as well as specify the tools used and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final outcome of the activity. A lack of transparency in the use of AI will be considered a breach of academic integrity and may result in a partial or total deduction from the mark for the activity, or more severe sanctions in serious cases, as determined by the teaching staff.

Plagiarism and irregularities

Any student found to have committed any form of misconduct (cheating, plagiarism, impersonation or similar) will be awarded 0 points for that assignment or activity.

In the event of multiple or repeated instances of misconduct, the final mark for the module will be 0 and, consequently, the student will fail the module.

The performance of any irregularity in an evaluation act (academic fraud, plagiarism or improper use of AI, unless this use is expressly authorized by the teaching guide), which may lead to a significant variation in the grade, assumes that this act will be graded with a 0. In the event that the teaching guide foresees that in order to pass the subject it is an essential requirement to have obtained a minimum grade in this evaluation act or that there are several irregularities in the evaluation acts of the same subject, the final grade of this subject is 0. Apart from this, a disciplinary process may be instructed to the student that incurs any of these irregularities.

Any student suspected of submitting assignments that have been generated by AI, written by others or copied; include unattributed AI-generated content, or fall outside the permitted scope, may be asked to provide the preliminary work or other materials that can demonstrate it is original work and the result of their own authorship. They may also be asked to separately explain or justify their work. Teachers may also use AI detection systems or carry out any verification tasks they deem appropriate. If, after review, the instructor detects irregularities, the assignment may be graded zero, and the student may be subject to further disciplinary action.