The first block consists of theoretical lectures delivered by the teaching staff, with the aim of providing the conceptual and methodological foundations of the subject.

The second block combines theoretical and practical sessions, including the analysis of specific case studies, activities for the application of course content, and student presentations in class.

The third block is primarily practice-oriented and is devoted to the development of a project involving the creation of the soundtrack and musical design for an audiovisual excerpt, integrating the knowledge acquired throughout the course through the use of professional music production and audio editing software.

Innovative teaching methodologies used in the course:

The course primarily adopts the Project-Based Learning (PBL) methodology, structured around the development of a complete sound creation project for an audiovisual work. This methodology is complemented by active learning strategies, collaborative learning, and formative assessment through continuous feedback. In addition, digital technologies are integrated through the use of professional music production and digital audio software, fostering the development of the technical and creative competencies required in professional practice.

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

To pass the course, students must obtain an overall average grade of 5/10.

CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT

The following assessment activities will be completed during the course:

• History Block (40%): A written examination covering the theoretical content addressed in class.
• Analysis Block (35%): A written examination covering the theoretical content addressed in class, accounting for up to 8 points (out of 10) of the grade for this block. In addition, practical in-class exercises will contribute up to 2 points to the block grade.
• Audiovisual Creation Block (25%): Projects will be assessed according to the quality of the work in relation to the criteria covered in class, using a rubric, instructor assessment, and peer assessment.

In the event of partial non-submission of coursework or failure to pass one or more of the written examinations, students may resit up to two assessment components on the date established by the Faculty, provided they have obtained a minimum overall average of 3.5/10 across all assessment activities. The highest possible grade for any resit assessment is 5/10.

SINGLE ASSESSMENT

Choosing the single assessment option does not exempt students from attending classes.

The single assessment will consist of three assessment components, to be completed on a date that will be announced after the beginning of the course through the Virtual Campus: a written examination covering the contents of the History Block (40%), a written examination covering the contents of the Analysis Block (35%), and the submission of an Audiovisual Creation Project (25%). The same resit policy as for continuous assessment will apply.

ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

• In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for this activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.
• Submission of any coursework or attendance at any written examination constitutes participation in the course assessment. Consequently, only students who have not completed any assessment activity throughout the semester will be eligible for a final grade of "Not Assessed/ Not Submitted".
• If on-campus assessment cannot be carried out, the assessment format will be adapted (while maintaining the same weighting) to the virtual tools provided by the UAB. Coursework, class activities, and participation will take place through forums, wikis, Microsoft Teams discussions, or similar platforms. The instructor will ensure that students have access to these resources or will provide alternative arrangements whenever possible.
• This subject allows the use of AI technologies as an integral part of the submitted work, provided that the final result reflects a significant contribution from the student in terms of analysis and personal reflection.The student must clearly (i) identify which parts have been generated using AI technology; (ii) specify the tools used; and (iii) include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and final outcome of the activity. Lack of transparency regarding the use of AI in the assessed activity will be considered academic dishonesty; the corresponding grade may be lowered, or the work may even be awarded a zero. In cases of greater infringement, more serious action may be taken.
• Erasmus and exchange students who request to advance an exam must present a document from their home university justifying their request.