The teaching methodology will be mixed.

Theory (TE)

The subject is taught through theoretical classes in which the basic concepts are worked on. It will be complemented with practical exercises. The planning of the contents will be available at Moodle.

Seminars (SEM)

• There will be a total of 5 sessions of 2 hours duration.
• The work will be done in stable groups during all sessions of 4 or 6 students.
• Students will have to plan a prevention intervention to try to cope with a health problem related to physiotherapy in a population group.
• In order to carry out this activity, the concepts of the theoretical sessions (epidemiology, determinants of health, activities of prevention and health promotion, health education, planning and evaluation of an intervention) should be applied.
• The health problem to be worked on will be selected from a list provided by the teacher. The topics of each seminar group have to be different.
• Each teamwork will work autonomously on the chosen health problem.
• In each seminar session the groups must present one of the sections of the work to the rest of the group. Sharing the work will serve to clarify doubts.
• A written document will be prepared that includes the different stages of the intervention program
• In the final seminar session, there will be a presentation of the intervention programs prepared by each group.

Tutoring may be arranged with the coordinator responsible for the contactant assignment for electronic correspondence.

In this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is not allowed in any of its phases. Any work that includes fragments generated with AI will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may lead to a partial or total penalty in the grade of the activity, or greater sanctions in serious cases.

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

The evaluation system is organized into 2 blocks, with a specific weight in the final grade:

• Tests with multiple-choice questions and practical exercises (60%)

o First partial (30%). Theoretical content of the first half of the syllabus approximately. Individual

o Second partial (30%). Theoretical content of the second half of the syllabus approximately. Individual

• Seminars: preparation and oral presentation of a project (40%)

o Written project report (30%) Group

o Oral presentation (10%) Group

In the Moodle of the subject there will be a document that will detail the activities and evaluation criteria of continuous evaluation and the seminars.

Obtaining the final grade

The realization and delivery of works and / or tests of knowledge that are proposed is mandatory. The non-presentation of any of them will score as 0 in the calculation of the final evaluation grade.

To pass the subject, the average grade of the 2 partial tests (which weigh 60%) must be equal to or greater than 5 points.

According to agreement 4.4 of the Board of Governors of the regulations of evaluation, the qualifications will be:

• From 0 to 4.8 = Fail
• From 4.9 to 6.8 = Pass
• From 6.9 to 8.8 = Good
• From 8.9 to 10 = Excellent

Definition of not evaluable

The student who does not attend the evaluation sessions and does not make or deliver any of the works and /or tests that are proposed will be considered NOT EVALUABLE.

Review of the written test

The student has the right to review his written test, for which a date will be set in the Virtual Campus. In any case, it will be done individually and according to the current regulations of the UAB.

Retake exam

Students who have not passed the subject through continuous assessment may take a final synthesis test that will include the entire subject syllabus.

The condition to participate in the retake exam is:

• Having previously been evaluated in a set of activities the weight of which equals a minimum of two thirds (66%) of the grade of the subject.

This subject contemplates the single evaluation system.

The commission of any irregularity in an assessment activity

The commission of any irregularity in an assessment activity (academic fraud, plagiarism, or misuse of AI, unless such use is explicitly authorized in the course guide) that may lead to a significant change in the grade will result in that activity being graded as 0. If the course guide stipulates that passing the subject requires obtaining a minimum mark in that assessment activity, or if multiple irregularities occur across the assessments of the same subject, the final grade for the subject will be 0. Additionally, disciplinary proceedings may be initiated against any student who commits any of these irregularities.

SINGLE ASSESSMENT

In the same session of approximately 2,5 hours, the following evaluation activities will be carried out:

1) Exam with multiple choice questions (60%) Time: 90 minutes. The questions will be about the theoretical contents of the subject.

2) Oral presentation of an original scientific article (10%). Time: 8 minutes. A list of health problems will be provided two weeks before the test date so that the student has time to prepare for the following evaluation activities:

• The student will have to search for an original scientific article (not a review article) published in the last 5 years on an intervention that has been shown to be effective in preventing the chosen health problem.
• The student will have to orally present to the faculty the structured content of the article with the support of slides (power point).
• The student will have to submit the article worked on and the presentation file (in .pdfformat) to Moodlebefore the evaluation date.

3) Open questions with short answers and problem solving (30%) Time: 60 minutes.

• Questions on the practical application of concepts related to the development and evaluation of an intervention program for the prevention of musculoskeletal health problems (objective setting, evaluation indicators,...).

Obtaining the final grade

The same conditions as in the case of continuous evaluation.

Definition of not evaluable

Any student who does not attend the assessment session and fails to complete all required tests will be considered ‘Non-evaluable".

Review of the written test

The student has the right to review his written test, for which a date will be set in the Virtual Campus. In any case, it will be done individually and according to the current regulations of the UAB.

Retake exam

Students who have not passed the subject through the single assessment may take a retake exam that will include the same type of tests detailed in the single assessment section.