The teaching methodology of the subject is aimed at promoting the autonomy, reflection and critical attitude of the student body. Those contents that, by their nature, allow it, will be addressed from a gender perspective. Likewise, throughout the course equal participation in the subject will be promoted.

Following the order of the training activities presented, the autonomous activities will consist of the individual review of bibliographic and documentary material, which will lead to the creation of diagrams, concept maps and summaries, which will be used later in individual and group work.

The directed activities will be of two types: master classes and classroom group sessions. In both cases, the sessions will last 2 hours, but, although the master classes will be held weekly, the classroom group sessions will be held, for the most part, biweekly. Both will incorporate teaching innovations such as problem-based learning, debates and round tables, or the implementation, by the student body, of the roles of researchers and facilitators in the classroom.

However, the development of the activities directed in the classroom will contemplate:

• 12 master classes: Where, basically, the theory will be addressed.
• 6 classroom group sessions: Where the oral and written presentations of the coursework and reports will be displayed and worked on. The final session will be devoted to the presentations of the coursework.

Finally, the supervised activities will revolve around issues associated with the design and preparation of the classroom group sessions.

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

The achievement of the competences in this subject will be evaluated through the following evidence, contemplated in the evaluation guidelines of the Faculty of Psychology: https://www.uab.cat/doc/DOC_Pautes_Avaluacio_2025-2026

Evidence Code	Denomination	Weigt	Format	Autorship	Via	Week
Ev1	Multiple alternative exam on the contents of the theory program	30%	Written	Individual	Presential	Second evaluation period
Ev2	Individual work: case analysis	30%	Written	Individual	Presential	Between weeks 7 and 10
Ev3	Work portfolio	40%	Written	Individual	Presential-monitoring	Between weeks 10 and 12

As indicated by the Faculty's assessment guidelines, the definition of a passed module in continuous assessment, on a 0-10 scale, must include having obtained a minimum mark of 5.0 points and a mark of 4.0 points or higher in each of the in-person assessment activities that contribute 20% or more to the mark for this continuous assessment. Furthermore, students who have submitted learning evidence with a weighting of 40% or more cannot be marked as “Not Graded”.

Regarding the feedback on each piece of evidence, this will be provided in two ways: 1) In writing, via Moodle, with comments and areas for improvement for each submission, as well as the strengths of the evidence (week 8 for individual work, and at the end of the semester for group work and the exam); and 2) Orally in class, with individual learning monitoring and feedback (week 8 for individual work, and week 12 for the portfolio).

A resit will be available for students who have NOT passed the continuous assessment, provided that the assessed work accounts for two-thirds or more of the total mark and they have achieved a final mark of less than 5 but 3.5 or higher. This will be a resit exam covering the entire course material.The maximum final grade that can be achieved in the subject through recovery is a 5.

Students on their second or subsequent enrolment are not assessed by a single, non-recoverable summative exam.

The single assessment will be held on the same day and at the same time as the second assessment period's exam, and will comprise a range of activities detailed below: a multiple-choice exam, the individual report, and the development of practical cases. The single assessment is requested online and must be approved by the Faculty. For the single assessment, the assessment system will be as follows:

Evidence Code	Denomination	Weight	Duration	Data
Ev1	Multiple alternative exam	30%		Second evaluation period
Ev2	Individual report: theoretical-empirical essay	30%
Ev3	Development of the practical cases	40%

Copying or plagiarism: According to Art. 116, point 10 of the UAB Regulations, in the event that the student body performs any irregularity (copying, plagiarism...) that may lead to a significant variation in the qualification of an evaluation act, this will be scored with a 0. In the event that there are several irregularities in the evidence of learning or use of AI in the preparation of their answers, the final grade will be 0. In the case of written evidence (EV2 and EV3), it will be will use the Urkund program to verify possible plagiarism.

The translation of the in-person assessment tests will be delivered if the requirements established in Article 263 are met and the request is made online (e-form) during week 4 (more information on the faculty website).

For this course, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted exclusively for support tasks, such as bibliographic or information searches, text correction, or translations. Students must clearly identify which parts have beengenerated using this technology, specify the tools used, and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final result of the activity. Failure to disclose the use of AI in this assessable activity will be considered academic dishonesty and may result in a partial or total penalty on the activity grade, or more severe penalties in serious cases.