Large group sessions based on challenge-based learning. There will be 4 challenges to be achieved and evaluated in a series of 3 sessions. The 4 challenges will have the same structure: (a) first session of planning by the teachers in the classroom, (b) second session of supervised work in the classroom, and (c) third session of evaluation and return to the classroom.

Challenge 1: Promote a professional practice based on scientific evidence (sessions 1-3)

Challenge 2: Educational and equitable sports initiation (sessions 4-6)

Challenge 3: Healthy and ethical high sports performance (sessions 7-9)

Challenge 4: The holistic and ecological conception of the sports career (sessions 10-12)

In the small group seminars, 6 sessions will be held throughout the semester to develop a Professional Project Based on Scientific Evidence (PPBE) based on demands from people or sports institutions.

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

Code	Task	Weight %	Mode	Presentation	Format	Week
EV1R1	Group Exhibition on Challenge 1	15	Both	Group	In presence	3
EV2R2	Written test on challenge 2	15	Written	Individual	In presence	6
EV3PP1	PPBEC Scientific congress and project presentation	10	Both	Group	Both	11
EV4R3	Case study on Challenge 3	15	Written	Individual	In presence	10
EV5PP2	Professional Project Report	15	Written	Group	Virtual	14
EV6PP3	Professional Project Presentation	15	Oral	Group	In presence	14
EV7RE4	Case analysis on challenge 4	15	Both	Individual	In presence	13

Feedback	Evidence	Week
Written	EV2R2	10
	EV4R3	14
Online (Moodle)	EV3PP1	14
	EV5PP2	19
Classroom	EV1R1	3
	EV6PP3	14
	EV7RE4	13
Tutorship	EV2R2	10
	EV4R3	14

An assessable student would be anyone who has presented evidences with a weight equal to or greater than 40% of the grade.

To pass the subject for continuous assessment, it will be necessary (a) to obtain a grade equal to or greater than 5 in the weighted sum of all the evidences, and (b) an average score of these greater than 3.5. In case of not meeting these requirements, the maximum grade to be recorded in the academic record will be 4.5 points and the student will have the right to retake.

Students who have made evidence with a weight equal to or greater than 2/3 of the total grade and have obtained a grade of less than 5 points and greater than or equal to 3.5 points may take the retake. Written tests linked to the challenges can be recovered. The professional project based on scientific evidence is not recoverable. In case of passing the retake test, regardless of the grade obtained in each of the evidences recovered, the maximum grade that can be obtained in the subject is a 5.

It is not expected that students in 2nd or subsequent enrolment will be assessed by means of a single non-recoverable synthesis test.

THE SINGLE EVALUATION IS REQUESTED ELECTRONICALLY (E-FORM) IN THE SPECIFIC PERIOD (more information on the Faculty's website).

The single evaluation will be carried out in the second evaluation period. In it, all the contents of the subject will be evaluated with the same evaluative weight as in the continuous evaluation. The 4 written tests linked to the 4 challenges of the subject (60%) will be carried out with an evaluative weight as well as that of the continuous evaluation of the challenges, and a professional project report will be delivered aimed at responding to a specific demand of a sports entity (40%). The approximate duration of the test will be 4 hours. The same recovery process as that of continuous assessment will be applied.

In this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is allowed as an integral part of the development of the work, provided that the final result reflects a significant contribution of the student in personal analysis and reflection. The student should clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used, and include critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final outcome of the activity. Non-transparency in the use of AI will be considered academic dishonesty and may lead to a penalty in the grade of the activity, or greater sanctions in cases of seriousness

Link to Faculty Evaluation Guidelines: https://www.uab.cat/web/estudiar/graus/graus/avaluacions-1345722525858.html