
Introduction to Archaeology
Code: 100720Credits: 6
| Degree programme | Type | Course |
|---|---|---|
| Ancient Studies | FB | 1 |
Contact lecturer
- Name :
- Esther Rodrigo Requena
- Email :
- esther.rodrigo@uab.cat
Group languages
You can consult this information at the end of the document.
Prerequisites
No prerequisites are required to enroll
Objectives
Learning outcomes
- Use the basic digital tools needed in professional practice related to studies in classical antiquity.
- Identifying the specific methods of history and their relationship with the analysis of particular facts.
- Organising and planning the search of historical information.
- Identify and assess the different stages in the historical evolution of the civilisations of the ancient Near East and their main cultural achievements.
- Describe the political, social and economic reality of the peoples of the Near East in antiquity.
- Mastering the general diachronic structure of the past.
- Interpret textual and iconographic documents as sources for learning about the political, socioeconomic and cultural history of the ancient Near East.
- Organise and plan the search for historical and archaeological information.
- Interpret ancient societies from an analysis of the surviving material vestiges of these.
- Interpret material sources and the archaeological register.
- Use digital tools to gather, classify, interpret and publish significant data for studying antiquity.
Contents
Learning activities and methodology
| Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visit to an archaeological site | 5 | 0.2 | 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 10 |
| Study and reading about the matter taught in class | 20 | 0.8 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11 |
| Classroom activities | 35 | 1.4 | 2, 5, 7 |
| Identification and differentiation of an archaeological stratigraphy | 5 | 0.2 | 1, 2, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11 |
| Exercises and bibliographical research work | 20 | 0.8 | 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11 |
| Field trips | 21 | 0.84 | 2, 6, 8, 9, 10 |
| Directed activities |
|
|
|
||||||
| Classroom activities: | - master class | - Practical exercises: introduction and/or review of teaching units and application of theoretical concepts to practice. | - reading press articles with the subsequent debate | - videos | 34h 30’ | Use the main methods or techniques in archaeological research |
|
|
|
| Activities in the field | Theoretical concepts and practical application of these concepts: | -Introduction to jaciment | - Archaeological topography | - Excavation documentation | 18 | -Develop some first qualifications regarding the different processes involved in archaeological excavation.. |
|
||
| Supervised |
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Camp practices: | - Observation and analysis of the different stratigraphic units in an archaeological site: Torre Llauder | 10h | |||||||
| Visit at Torre Llauder | 5h | Acquire knowledge about the possibilities of archaeological diffusion from an example of significant archaeological discovery | |||||||
| Autonomous |
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Exercises and bibliographic research work | 48 h | - Put into practice different bibliographic research strategies and take advantage of the UAB's resources (with data bases). | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Study and read about the subject taught in class | 30 h 30’ | Consolidate Knowledge |
Assessment
Continuous assessment activities
| Title | Weight | Hours | ECTS | Learning outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exercises and bibliographical research work | 25% | 25 | 1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11 |
| Subject theory test Block II | 30% | 2 | 0.08 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 |
| Case studies and corresponding oral presentations | 15% | 15 | 0.6 | 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11 |
| Theoretical test Block I | 30% | 2 | 0.08 | 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11 |
Evaluation indicators:
1. Theoretical test I (30%).
There will be two partial examinations to evaluate the theory
Evaluation system:
The concepts taught in class will be evaluated based on a topic-based question - of analysis and synthesis and, optionally, also of critical reflection - to choose between two options.
Competencies to demonstrate to obtain optimal evaluation results:
Knowledges:
A correct assimilation of the knowledge taught in class and its deepening, as a minimum, from one of the bibliographical citations of the basic bibliography for each teaching unit. In case you have not used bibliography to deepen the concepts you will have the option to approve but not to the qualifications of remarkable or excellent.
Abilities:
- Analyze and synthesize information, distinguishing the importance of high school.
- Develop a critical thinking and reasoning.
- Be able to communicate appropriately the acquired knowledge. Write with grammar correction and use appropriate vocabulary and academic style, as well as a specific technical vocabulary and interpretation.
- Master the necessary languages to be able to deepen the class contents with the appropriate bibliography.
- Have developed autonomous learning abilities to deepen the classroom content with the appropriate bibliography.
2. Theoretical test I (30%).
There will be two partial examinations to evaluate the theory
Evaluation system:
The concepts taught in class will be evaluated based on a topic-based question - of analysis and synthesis and, optionally, also of critical reflection - to choose between two options.
Competencies to demonstrate to obtain optimal evaluation results:
Knowledges:
A correct assimilation of the knowledge taught in class and its deepening, as a minimum, from one of the bibliographical citations of the basic bibliography for each teaching unit. In case you have not used bibliography to deepen the concepts you will have the option to approve but not to the qualifications of remarkable or excellent.
Abilities:
- Analyze and synthesize information, distinguishing the importance of high school.
- Develop a critical thinking and reasoning.
- Be able to communicate appropriately the acquired knowledge. Write with grammar correction and use appropriate vocabulary and academic style, as well as a specific technical vocabulary and interpretation.
- Master the necessary languages to be able to deepen the class contents with the appropriate bibliography.
- Have developed autonomous learning abilities to deepen the classroom content with the appropriate bibliography.
3. Exercises and bibliographical research work (25%).
Competencies to demonstrate to obtain optimal evaluation results:
Knowledges:
- Be able to develop a formally correct research work both in terms of structure and references and bibliographical citations.
- Demonstrate a correct assimilation of the exposed contents.
Abilities:
- Analyze and synthesize information, distinguishing the importance of high school.
- Develop a critical thinking and reasoning.
- Write with grammar correction and use appropriate vocabulary and academic style, as well as a specific technical vocabulary and interpretation.
- Search, select and manage information independently, both in structural sources (databases, bibliographies, specialized journals) and in information distributed on the network.
- Use basic computer tools (such as word processors or databases).
- Skills for team work: commitment with the team, collaboration habit and ability to incorporate in the resolution of problems.
- Have developed autonomous learning abilities.
4. Case studies and individual dossier (15%).
Competencies to be demonstrated for the obtaining of optimal evaluation results:
Knowledges:
- Respond to all questions raised in the reference scripts of the activities.
- Demonstrate a correct assimilation of the exposed contents.
Abilities:
- Ability to connect theoretical contents with archaeological practice.
- Make clear oral presentations, structured, didactic, and use appropriate vocabulary and academic style.
- Analyze and synthesize information, distinguishing the importance of high school.
- Develop a critical thinking and reasoning.
- Search, select and manage information independently, both in structural sources (databases, bibliographies, specialized journals) and in information distributed on the network.
- Use basic computer tools (such as the Power Point).
- Skills for team work: commitment with the team, collaboration habit and ability to incorporate in the resolution ofproblems.
- Ability to debate based on specialized knowledge acquired.
- Master the necessary languages to be able to carry out the relevant readings.
- Have developed autonomous learning abilities.
Competencies to demonstrate to obtain optimal evaluation results:
Knowledges:
-Demonstrate that they have been gaining knowledge of archaeological stratigraphy, excavation documentation, and treatment and classification of materials.
Abilities:
- Skills for team work: commitment with the team, collaboration habit and ability to incorporate in the resolution of problems.
Attitudes:
- Dynamism.
- Responsibility.
- Constance.
Single evaluation. Degree of Antique Science:
This subject/module does not foresee the single evaluation system
Evaluation conditions:
- There will be a single call.
- The delayed delivery of the assessment activities without having previously agreed with the teaching staff will be reduced by 10% of the mark for each day of delay.
Not Submitted
Students will obtain a Not assessed/Not submitted course grade unless they have submitted more than 30% of the assessment items.
- If the mark of 50% or more of the assessment activities is less than 5 out of 10, there will be no average between the different activities and the subject will not be approved.
On carrying out each evaluation activity, lecturers will inform students (on Moodle) of the procedures to be followed for reviewing all grades awarded, and
the date on which such a review will take place.
Use of artificial intelligence
This subject entirely prohibits the use of AI technologies in all of its activities. Any submitted work that contains content generated using AI will be considered academic dishonesty; the
corresponding grade will be awarded a zero, without the possibility of reassessment. In cases of greater infringement, more serious action may be taken.
Plagiarism
In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given
a zero for this activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject,
the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject
Conditions for re-evaluation
To be eligible for recovery, the student must have been evaluated for 2/3 of the total.
Revaluation calendar
The dates of the reassessment exams are determined by the faculty. It is the responsibility of each one to know the date that corresponds to do the re-evaluation of the your subject
Erasmus and exchange students who request to advance an exam must present a document from their home university justifying their request
Bibliography
Software
No specific software required
Course groups and languages
The information provided is provisional until November 30. After this date, you will be able to consult the language of each group through this link. To access the information, you will need to enter the course CODE
| Type of teaching | Group | Language | Semester | Shift |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (TE) Theory | 2 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |
| (PAUL) Classroom practices | 21 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |
| (PCAM) Field practices | 21 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |
| (PAUL) Classroom practices | 22 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |
| (PCAM) Field practices | 22 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |
| (PCAM) Field practices | 23 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |