-Assistance to theoretical classes led by the teacher

-Assistance to seminaries and practical sessions led by the teacher

-Comprehensive reading of texts and interpretations of historical sources and archaeological documents

-Realization of works and analytical comments

-Personal study

In the event that tests or exams cannot be taken onsite, they will be adapted to an online format made available through the UAB’s virtual tools (original weighting will be maintained). Homework, activities and class participation will be carried out through forums, wikis and/or discussion on Teams, etc. Lecturers will ensure that students are able to access these virtual tools, or will offer them feasible alternatives.

This subject allows the use of AI technologies as an integral part of the submitted work, provided that the final result reflects a significant contribution from the student in terms of analysis and personal reflection.

The student must clearly

1. identify which parts have been generated using AI technology;

2. specify the tools used; and

3. include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and final outcome of the activity.

Lack of transparency regarding the use of AI in the assessed activity will be considered academic dishonesty; the corresponding grade may be lowered, or the work may even be awarded a zero. In cases of greater infringement, more serious action may be taken.

In the case of students who take the Continuous Assessment, the assessment will be based on the following items:

40% Work on the state of the matter of a problem chosen by the student, with the teacher's approval.

25% Final test which will consist of a broad topic to be developed.

25% Final test that will consist of a text comment.

10% Participation, attendance and progression.

Assessment activities delivered within the deadlines set by the subject teacher will be reassessed; under no circumstances may an exercise be presented for the first time during the reassessment period.

Participation, attendance and progression are not reevaluated.

In the event that the student commits any irregularity that could lead to a significant variation in the grade of an assessment act, this assessment act will be graded with 0, regardless of the disciplinary process that may be instituted. In the event that several irregularities occur in the evaluation acts of the same subject, the final grade for this subject will be 0.

If the tests cannot be taken in person, their format will be adapted (maintaining their weighting) to the possibilities offered by the UAB's virtual tools. Homework, activities and class participation will be done through forums, wikis and/or exercise discussions through Teams, etc. The teacher will ensure that the student can access it or will offer him or her alternative means, which are within their reach.

Students will obtain a Not assessed/Not submitted course grade unless they have submitted more than 30% of the assessment items.

In the case of students taking the Single Assessment, the assessment will be based on the following items.

40% Work on the state of the matter of a problem chosen by the student, with the teacher's approval. It will be delivered on the same day as the Final Test.

25% Final Test 1 which will consist of a broad topic to be developed. It will be held on the same day as Final Test 2.

25% Final test 2 which will consist of a text comment. It will be held on the same day as the Final 1 test.

10% Participation, attendance and progression.

With regard to the reassessment and regulations for irregularities, the same will apply as established by the Continuous Assessment.

The schedule of the assessment tests cannot be modified, unless there is an exceptional and duly justified reason. In situations of chronic or acute proven illness, students have the right to a postponement up to the limit allowed by the academic calendar. In these cases, the request to change the date or time must be submitted at least seven days in advance, providing the corresponding supporting documents. When the cause is force majeure, the regulations allow the request to be submitted after the scheduled date of the test, as long as the supporting documents are provided within a maximum period of three working days. This includes, for example, a birth or adoption, or the death of the partner or a relative up to the second degree. In the case of illness or other circumstances, the supporting documents must clearly prove that the student was not in a position to take the test on the scheduled date and time. It is up to the faculty to take into consideration any circumstances outside of those previously established.

Erasmus/exchange students who need to leave before the dates set for the evaluation must justify this with an official document from their home university addressed to the Degree Exchange Manager and that proves a calendar need.

If the student commits any irregularity that could lead to a significant variation in the grade of an assessment, this assessment will be graded 0, regardless of the disciplinary process that may be initiated. If several irregularities occur in the assessment acts of the same subject, the final grade for this subject will be 0.

And finally, at the time of carrying out each evaluation activity, the teacher will inform the students (Moodle) of the procedure and date for reviewing the grades.