Attendance at theoretical classes led by the teacher.

Attendance to sessions of seminars and practices directed by the teacher.

Comprehensive reading of texts.

Learning information search strategies.

Making reviews, work and / or analytical comments.

Personal study

Activities:

Directed

Theoretical classes 39h Identify the key historical concepts of the Spanish society of the period. Identify and appropriately use sources of information for the historical research of Contemporary Spain.

Develop the capacity for analysis and synthesis.

Reason critically

Seminars and guided practices 11h Analyze historical documentation.

Supervised

Tutorials 15 h. Resolve doubts, deepen knowledge.

Autonomous

Personal study 35h

Reading of texts. Writing of works. Search of bibliographic information. 17h

The evaluation activities will be scheduled during the academic year. Students will be informed well in advance of the dates for the in-class tests and for the submission of text comments and reviews. In this sense, at the time of each assessment activity, the teacher will inform the students (Moodle) of the procedure and the date for the revision of grades.

Assessment dates can’t be changed unless there’s an exceptional and well-justified reason. If a student has a documented chronic or acute illness, they can request to postpone the assessment, if it fits within the academic calendar. These requests must be submitted at least seven days in advance and include the required documentation. If the reason is an unexpected situation considered force majeure, the regulations allow

the request to be submitted after the scheduled date, provided the documentation is delivered within three working days. This includes situations such as the birth or adoption of a child, or the death of a partner or a close relative (up to second degree). In cases of illness or other circumstances, the documentation must clearly show that the student was not in a condition to take the assessment at the scheduled time. Teaching staff may also use their discretion to consider other circumstances not explicitly listed above.

Erasmus students who need to leave before the scheduled assessment dates must provide an official document from their home university, addressed to the Degree Exchange Coordinator, confirming a calendar

conflict (an overlap with academic activities at their home institution). In the same sens, exchange students who request to advance an exam must present a document from their home university justifying their request.

The evaluative evidence will be broken down into: A) one exam which will be worth 50% of the final mark (and must be passed in order to pass the course as a whole) B) a paper which will be proposed by the teacher and which will be worth between 30% and 35% of the final mark. C) A text commentary or practical that will be worth 20% or 15% of the final grade.

The student will receive a grade of ‘Not evaluable’ provided that he/she has not handed in more than 30% of the evaluation activities. To be eligible for retake, the student must have been evaluated in a set of activities whose weight is equivalent to a minimum of 2/3.

In the event that a student commits any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade of an assessment act, this assessment act will be graded 0, regardless of any disciplinary proceedings that may be instituted. In the event of several irregularities in the assessment acts of the same subject, the final grade for this subject will be 0.

Adaptations and changes in the evaluation procedure

Students with recognized specific assessment needs will communicate this to the professor and an adaptation plan will be made that includes the measures proposed by the Equality and Diversity Service.

In the event that, due to unforeseen and justified situations, it is necessary to modify the evaluation procedure described in the teaching guide and/or the date published in the evaluation calendar, the professor responsible for the subject will present and discuss the proposed modification with the affected class group and this will be communicated through the Virtual Campus of the subject as soon as possible.

Single assessment

This will be based on three activities consisting of a paper and two written exercises, which will represent 50%, 25% and 25% of the final grade. Choosing the single assessment exempt the student from attending classes. The same recovery system will be applied as for the continuous assessment.

Use of Artificial Intelligence

This subject allows the use of AI technologies exclusively for support tasks such as bibliographic or content-based searches. Other specific situations may be contemplated, as deemed appropriate by the teacher. The student must clearly (i) identify which parts have been generated using AI technology; (ii) specify the tools used; and (iii) include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and final outcome

of the activity. Lack of transparency regarding the use of AI in the assessed activity will be considered academic dishonesty; the corresponding grade may be lowered, or the work may even be awarded a zero. In cases of greater infringement, more serious action may be taken.