The course will consist of tutorial meetings between the students and the professor, where the technical aspects of the course content will be discussed, as well as tasks appropriate to the students’ profile. At the end of the course, there will be an in-person assessment (to be decided whether in small groups or individually, depending on the variables accepted by the OQD).

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT:

The Department of Philosophy agreed that the subjects of the first semester would have two periods of concentration of evaluation activities and a week in which students could prepare specifically for the tests in the modality that each teacher will specify at the beginning of the course. The dates for the review week and in which the tests will be concentrated are:

• Oct. 27- Oct. 31: review week or tutorials

• Nov. 3 - Nov. 7: evaluation week

• January 8-9-12-13-14: evaluation week

The continuous evaluation will consist of:

A) Two partial exams (40% + 40%), one for each block of the subject. The format will be announced sufficiently in advance.

B) A group presentation (20%). The format will be announced sufficiently in advance.

All assessment activities will have a corresponding review. At the time of each assessment activity, the teacher will inform the students (via Moodle) of the procedure and date for reviewing grades.

To pass the subject, a minimum average of 5 is required. The student will receive a grade of \"Not Assessable\" if they have not submitted more than 30% of the assessment activities.

If a student commits any irregularity that could significantly alter the grade of an assessment activity, that activity will be graded as 0, regardless of any disciplinary process that may be initiated. If multiple irregularities occur in the assessment activities of the same subject, the final grade for the subject will be 0.

To be eligible for the retake, the student must have been previously assessed in a set of activities whose weight is equivalent to at least 2/3 of the total grade. The minimum average grade of the assessed activities cannot be less than 3 or more than 5.

The retake will consist of resubmitting the failed assessment activities in a format that will be announced well in advance.

Any modifications related to assessment, methodology, etc., will be promptly communicated through the virtual campus.

UNIQUE ASSESSMENT

The unique evaluation procedure will be based on three tests that will take place on the same day.

The evidence for each test is as follows:

A review, such as those developed by the continuous assessment on a required reading 20%

A commentary on a text presented in class 40%

A written exam 40%

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)

This subject allows the use of AI technologies exclusively for support tasks such as [content-based searches, text correction or translation, and quotes and references, where applicable]. For subjects in a Modern Languages degree, the use of translation must be specifically authorised by the teacher. Other specific situations may be contemplated, as deemed appropriate by the teacher.

The student must clearly (i) identify which parts have been generated using AI technology; (ii) specify the tools used; and (iii) include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and outcome of the activity.

Lack of transparency regarding the use of AI in the assessed activity will be considered academic dishonesty; the corresponding grade may be lowered, or the work may even be awarded a zero. In cases of greater infringement, more serious action may be taken.