The training activity will be developed according to the following dynamics:

1.Article discussion and master classes / expositions by the teaching staff

2. Reading of articles and documentary sources

3. Analysis and collective discussion of articles and documentary sources

4. Classroom practices: problem solving and/or cases and/or exercises-activities-infographics and review of research (reviews, comparisons, etc.)

5. Presentation / oral presentation of works

6. Tutorials

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT

The module will be assessed through the following activities:

• Assignment 1 (individual): critical review of a set of articles and co‑assessment of a classmate’s set of critical reviews, complemented with graphic supports to be determined and a presentation to the class group. Due approximately in the second week of April.

•Assignment 2 (individual): in‑person test / critical reviews of a set of articles, complemented with graphic supports to be determined and a presentation to the class group. Due/completed during the month of May.

• Class activities / exercises (individual/peers/small group) carried out in the classroom, attendance, and participation.

The final grade will be the weighted average of the planned activities. To apply this criterion, the following must be achieved:

• Obtain at least a 5 in the two required assignments,
• Complete at least 80% of the classroom activities/exercises with sufficient quality and commitment.
• Proof of 80% attendance.

If these criteria are not met, the course will be considered \"Not Assessable.\"

To be eligible to participate in the resit assessment, students must have been previously evaluated in a set of activities whose weight corresponds to at least two-thirds of the total grade for the course.

For failed assignments (grades 1 and 2) (more than 3.5), there will be the option to make up the assignments by submitting a new, improved assignment based on the instructor's instructions.

Due to their nature, exercises/activities completed in class cannot be made up.

Late submissions, corrections, improvements, resubmissions, make-ups, etc., will be marked with a maximum of 6.5. Make-up assignments must be submitted no later than two weeks after receiving the correction/feedback, and the final assignment must be submitted by June 20th.

All assignments (individual and group) will be considered for linguistic accuracy, writing, and formal presentation. Students must be able to express themselves fluently and accurately and demonstrate a high level of understanding of academic texts. An assignment may be returned (not graded) or failed if the instructor deems it does not meet these requirements. To pass this subject, students must demonstrate good general communicative competence, both orally and in writing, and a good command of the language(s) used.

Class attendance is mandatory. To obtain a positive final evaluation, students must have attended at least 80% of the classes.

Feedback and return of tests and assessment activities will be provided within a maximum of 20 business days.

The review process for exams/assignments will be carried out individually and in person.

Copying or plagiarism in any type of assessment activity constitute a serious offence and will be penalised with a grade of 0 for the course, with no possibility of resitting, whether it is an individual or group assignment (in the latter case, all group members will receive a 0). If, during an in‑class exam or individual assignment, the instructor considers that a student is attempting to cheat, or if the student is found with any document or device not authorised by the teaching staff, the activity will be graded with a 0, with no option for resit, and the student will therefore fail the course. An assignment, activity, or exam will be considered “copied” when it reproduces all or a significant part of another student’s work. An assignment or activity will be considered “plagiarised” when a portion of an author’s text is presented as one’s own without citing the sources, regardless of whether the original sources are in print or digital format.

For this course, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted in a restricted manner and only for assignments in which the teaching staff explicitly indicates so. The student must clearly identify which parts have been generated using such technology, specify the tools employed, and include a critical reflection on how these tools have influenced both the process and the final outcome of the activity. Unauthorized use or lack of transparency regarding the use of AI in any activity will be considered a breach of academic integrity and may result in failure of the assignment or more severe sanctions in cases of greater seriousness.

.

SINGLE ASSESSMENT

Students who opt for the single assessment have the same attendance requirements as their peers taking the continuous assessment. They must create a learning folder/portfolio (digital and/or paper format, to be determined by the faculty) with the following content

• Standard cover page of the master's degree

• Comprehensive index

• All activities proposed to the group in the classroom, Moodle, etc., including a summary of the final reflection completed as a group (or individually if this has not been completed).

• Assignment 1 (individual): critical review of a set of articles and self-co‑assessment of a classmate’s set of critical reviews, complemented with graphic supports to be determined and multimedia presentation

• Assignment 2 (individual): in‑person test / critical reviews of a set of articles, complemented with graphic supports to be determined and multimedia presentation.

The learning folder/portfolio with all the evidence will be delivered on the day established for students enrolled in continuous assessment: the individual in-person test and/or the submission of critical reviews of articles and a presentation with graphic support to be determined.

For the remaining elements (minimum criteria for being assessed or considered \"not assessable,\" attendance, weighting of work in the final grade, language proficiency and comprehension of academic texts, use of AI, remediation/revision, consideration of plagiarism/copying, etc.), the same criteria will apply as for students participating in continuous assessment.

ASSESSMENT with FINAL SUMMARY EXAM This course does not consider this option.