The methodology is consistent with the competences of the MURE, the learning outcomes linked to this module and the evaluation system designed.

It allows the implementation of different types of activities such as debates, research analysis, exhibitions, expert visits, case studies, etc.

Each of the sessions allows combining different types of activities to ensure a competency and global approach to the teaching and learning process.:

• Lectures / lectures

• Reading of articles and documentary sources

• Analysis and collective discussion of articles and documentary sources

• Classroom practices:

• Public oral presentation

• Tutorials

The attendance of all the students in the group, involvement, good attitude and participation are elements that ensure a good methodological development.

Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

Recommendations on gender perspective and inclusion will be pursued.

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

The module will be assessed through the activities indicated.

The final grade will be the weighted average of the planned activities. In order to apply this criterion, it will be essential to obtain a minimum grade of 5 in each of the planned assessment tasks.

The oral presentation of the research project will be made during the two sessions prior to the end of Module 1. The Final Project will be delivered, via Moodle, one week after the end of the module. The rest of the classroom activities will be distributed throughout the module, timed on the start and delivery date; these dates will be included in the subject program that will be made accessible on the first day of class.

If a student opts for the single assessment modality, they must submit, via Moodle, a PORTFOLIO with all the evidence established as assessment activities, and also make the oral presentation of the research project in person in the two sessions prior to the completion of Module 1. The oral presentation will be recorded videographically.

The return and monitoring of the activities that form part of the qualification will be equal to or less than 20 days. The test review procedure will be carried out individually. The student who wishes to review the grade must do so within 15 days of its publication during the tutorial schedule that the teaching staff has established for this module, and which is stated in the program of the same. Class attendance is mandatory. In order to obtain a positive final assessment, the student must have attended a minimum of 80% of the classes.

The recovery of the Final Module work and/or any classroom activity (in the case of students who do continuous assessment) or the Portfolio (in the case of students who do a single assessment) is planned to be carried out within a maximum period of one month after the end of the module, being able to obtain a maximum of a 6. The oral presentation (whether continuous or single assessment is carried out) will not be recoverable.

Copying or plagiarism in the case of work, constitutes a crime that implies failing the subject. A work or an activity will be considered to be “copied” when it reproduces all or part of the work of another colleague. A work or an activity will be considered to be “plagiarized” when a part of a text by an author is presented as one's own without citing the sources, regardless of whether the original sources are on paper or in digital format.

It is also necessary for the student to show good general communication skills, both orally and in writing, and a good command of the language or languages ​​​​that appear in the teaching guide. In all activities (individual and in groups), linguistic correction, writing and formal aspects of presentation will therefore be taken into account. Students must be able to express themselves fluently and correctly and must show a high degree of understanding of academic texts. An activity may be returned (not evaluated) or suspended if the teacher considers that it does not meet these requirements. In addition, before submitting evidence of learning, the student must check that they have correctly written the sources, notes, textual citations and bibliographical references following the APA regulations. In this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is allowed as an integral part of the development of the work, provided that the final result reflects a significant contribution by the student in the analysis and personal reflection. The student must clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final result of the activity. The lack of transparency in the use of AI will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may lead to a penalty in the grade of the activity, or greater sanctions in serious cases. Specific validations may be carried out to guarantee authorship and the acquisition of skills in the event of suspicion of academic fraud.

From the second registration, the evaluation of the module may consist, if the student so requests, of a synthesis test (according to point 2 of Article 267 of the UAB Academic Regulations).