Each day of class, a system of lecturing the knowledge corresponding to each lesson of the program will be established. Individual and group work will be programmed to apply the acquired knowledge.

The final mark of every student will be awarded according to the following criteria:

Active participation in class will be valued (20% of the final grade) and the realization of the proposed practices (30%). The final exam will be performed (50%), with the following content:

- Theoretical exam consisting of several questions of the theory taught.

- Practical exam for correcting citations from research sources.

- Sending through the virtual campus (aula moodle) of the provisional index and of about 10-15 pages of the TFM, written according to the knowledge of the subject.

Once the evaluation has been communicated, a review may be requested in order for the Professor to explain the applied criteria to the student (art. 114.3 UAB Academic Regulations),

without prejudice to the student's rights to challenge the grade.

The date of the final exam of the subject is scheduled in the exam calendar of the Faculty.

The scheduling of the evaluation tests cannot be modified, unless there is an exceptional and duly justified reason why an evaluation act cannot be carried out. In this case, the people responsible for the Master Degree, after consulting the lecturers and the student, will propose a new schedule within the corresponding school period (art. 115.1 Calendar of evaluation activities, UAB Academic Regulations).

To pass the subject, the student must have participated in the three evaluation activities and to obtain at least a 3,5 at the final exam. To take the final exam, it is necessary to attend at 90% of the classes.

To retake the exam, it is necessary to have obtained at least 3 in each of the three evaluation activities. Students who retake the exam may obtain a maximum grade of 7 in the subject.

It will be considered that a student who participates in any of the continuous evaluation activities will no longer be eligible for a “non-evaluable” status.

This subject/module does not provide for a single evaluation system.

AI Usage Policy: For this module, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted exclusively for activities specified by the teaching staff. Students must clearly identify which parts were generated using this technology, specify the tools employed, and include a critical reflection on how these tools influenced the process and the final outcome of the activity. Failure to be transparent about the use of AI in this assessable activity will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may result in a partial or total grade penalty, or more severe sanctions in serious cases.

Committing any irregularity during an assessment activity (academic fraud, plagiarism, or the improper use of AI—unless such use is expressly authorized in the course syllabus) that could lead to a significant change in the grade will result in that activity being graded as a 0. If multiple irregularities occur across assessment activities for the same course, the final grade for that course will be 0. Furthermore, disciplinary proceedings may be initiated against any student who commits such irregularities.