Design and train of oral presentations

Theorical and excersise lectures

 Collaborative activities and seminars

Assessment

All subjects are compulsory attendance, and are evaluated separately by different evaluating procedures including writing exams, theoretical and practical tests, oral presentations, research papers understanding, in-class brief questions, written works, etc.

Genneral Regulations of the Master:

- Every professor decides the number and typology of evaluation activities: oral presentations, written exams, delivery of discussed articles, tests.

- The final mark of the module will be the sum of the marks of every professor multiplied by the percentage of his classes in the total teaching of the module.

- To pass a module, it is mandatory a mark of 3.5 or higher in a 75% of all the activities in order to average with other marks of the professor and/or the module.

- There will be a period in January to repeat written exams with marks under 5. In the case of exams under 3.5, it will be mandatory to the student. In the case of exams between 3.5 and 5 it would be optional.

- The marks of other evaluations activities (i. e. oral presentations) will average with the rest of the marks of the professor/module independently of the value. There will be not option of repeating these evaluation activities.

VERY IMPORTANT: Partial or total plagiarising will immediately result in a FAIL (0) for the plagiarised exercise and the WHOLE subject. PLAGIARISING consists of copying text from unacknowledged sources -whether this is part of a sentence or a whole text - with the intention of passing it off as the student's own production. It includes cutting and pasting from internet sources, presented unmodified in the student's own text. Plagiarising is a SERIOUS OFFENCE. Students must respect authors' intellectual property, always identifying the sources they may use; they must also be responsible for the originality and authenticity of their own texts.

For this course, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted exclusively for support tasks, such as literature or information searches, text proofreading, or translations. Students must clearly identify which parts of their work were generated using these technologies, specify the tools used, and include a critical reflection on how these tools influenced both the process and the final outcome of the activity. Failure to disclose the use of AI in this assessed activity will be considered a breach of academic integrity and may result in a partial or full penalty in the activity's grade, or more severe sanctions in serious cases.

Any irregularity committed during an assessment activity (including academic fraud, plagiarism, or the improper use of AI, unless such use is expressly authorized in the course syllabus) that may lead to a significant change in the assessment outcome will result in a grade of 0 for that assessment. If the course syllabus stipulates that obtaining a minimum grade on this assessment is a mandatory requirement to pass the course, or if multiple irregularities occur across assessment activities within the same course, the final grade for the course will be 0. In addition, disciplinary proceedings may be initiated against any student who commits any of these irregularities.