-Attendance at theoretical lectures led by the lecturer.

-Attendance at classroom practical sessions led by the lecturer.

-Close reading of texts and interpretation of maps, graphs, tables, and archaeological documents.

-Preparation of reviews, assignments, and analytical commentaries.

-Independent study.

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

Assessment for this course will consist of four components:

• Exams: two exams on the theoretical content of the course (30% each, 60% of the total mark).

• Primary source commentary assignment (20%).

• Preparation of presentation (in group) on a topic related to the subject. The presentation will be recorded online and delivered via Moodle (20%).

In the event that the tests cannot be taken in person, their format will be adapted (maintaining their weighting) to the possibilities offered by the UAB's virtual tools. Homework, activities and class participation will be carried out through forums, wikis and/or exercise discussions through Teams, etc. The teacher will ensure that the student can access them or will offer alternative means that are within their reach.

Assessment dates can’t be changed unless there’s an exceptional and well‑justified reason.

Erasmus students who need to leave before the scheduled assessment dates must provide an official document from their home university, addressed to the Degree Exchange Coordinator, confirming a calendar conflict (an overlap with academic activities at their home institution).

To pass the subject, the four assessment activities must be completed. To be able to take an average, a minimum grade of 4 must be obtained in each activity. The student will receive the grade of "not assessable" provided that they have not submitted more than 30% of the assessment activities.

Retakes will consist of repeating only the tests that were not passed.

At the time of carrying out each assessment activity, the teacher will inform the students (Moodle) of the procedure and date of the review of the grades.

This subject does not include the Single Assessment.

In the event that the student carries out any irregularity that could lead to a significant variation in the grade of an assessment act, this assessment act will be graded 0, regardless of the disciplinary process that may be instructed. In the event that several irregularities occur in the assessment acts of the same subject, the final grade for this subject will be 0.

This subject allows the use of AI technologies exclusively for support tasks such as bibliographic or content-based searches, where applicable. The student must clearly (i) identify which parts have been generated using AI technology; (ii) specify the tools used; and (iii) include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and final outcome of the activity. Lack of transparency regarding the use of AI in the assessed activity will be considered academic dishonesty; the corresponding grade may be lowered, or the work may even be awarded a zero. In cases of greater infringement, more serious action may be taken.