The subject is organized into two main areas: the area of Digital Education (ED) and the area of Socioemotional Education (ESE). Both areas work in parallel and in a coordinated way in the class sessions established in the schedule.

Seminars in small groups are work spaces (with 1/3 of the group) where through various activities (case studies, analysis of materials, group dynamics, problem solving, creation of visual material, etc.) deepens the subject content.

The big group sessions are spaces for the substantiation of the concepts of the subject. They serve to establish the scientific concepts and are carried out with the entire class group.

Given the nature of the subject, both in seminar sessions and in big group sessions, active methodologies are applied, such as project work, collaborative learning, peer assessment, problem solving, gamification, debates, etc. , among others.

Students must be able to express themselves fluently and correctly and show a high degree of understanding of academic texts. An activity can be returned (not evaluated) or suspended if the teacher considers that the student does not meet these requirements. In all the activities (individual and in group) the linguistic correction, the writing and the formal aspects of presentation will be considered.

In the evaluation process, rubrics, checklists, evaluation guidelines, and other instruments as well as activities (such as peer-feedback) will be applied to ensure formative and continuous monitoring of the activities.

Attendance and participation in the sessions is mandatory to develop the competences established in the subject, it will be necessary to have attended and participated at least 80% of the classes in each section (80% attendance at ED; 80% attendance at ESE) to be assessed. In the case that the attendance requirement is not met, the student must retake all assessment activities in the reassessment dates, only if they meet the requirements for the retake assessment (indicated below).

To pass the subject it will be necessary to demonstrate that they have developed the competences of emotional education, teamwork and digital education. That is why each of the evaluation activities must be passed with a minimum grade of 5. There is a re-evaluation date for those who have failed any of the activities, only if the student has delivered 2/3 of the activities and the mean of the activities assessed have 3.5 as grade or higher. In the event of retaking individual and group assignments, the maximum grade that will be obtained will be 5. In the event of retaking the test, the grade for the retake will be considered as the test grade (whether it is higher or lower than that of the first assessment). If the student does not contribute or does not develop the group project, it cannot be reevaluated and, therefore, the subject will not be passed. When it is considered that the student has not been able to provide sufficient evaluation evidence (2/3 of the activities), this subject will be graded as non-evaluable. If after reassessment one or more evidences are failed, the final grade will be 4.

Evidences must be elaborated by the student or the team exclusively. It is considered that it has not been elaborated exclusively by the student when the assignment has been created with non-original elements (as artificial intelligence programs like ChatGPT, copilot, etc.). Specific validations will be carried out to guarantee authorship and the acquisition of skills in case of suspicion of academic fraud.

Copyingor plagiarism of material, both in the case of assignments and in the case of exams, constitutes a crime that will be sanctioned with a zero in the activity and the subject and will not have the right to re-evaluate it. Let us remember that a work that reproduces all or a largepart of the work of one other colleague is considered a \"copy\". \"Plagiarism\" is the act of presenting all or partof an author's text as one's own, without citing the sources, whether on paper or in digital format. You can see the UAB documentation on \"plagiarism\" at:http://wuster.uab.es/web_argumenta_obert/unit_20/sot_2_01.html

For this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is allowed exclusively in the correction of texts and in the activities proposed by the teacher that request their use during classroom activities. The student must clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final result of the activity. The lack of transparency of the use of AI in the assessment activities will be considered a lack of academic honesty and will lead to a score of 0.

Teachers will give the feedback of the evidences within 20 working days after the delivery.

This subject includes activities for the development of Digital Teaching Competence.

Assessment activities:

Group portfolio in blog format: 20% (ED)

Written test (individual): 30% (ED)

Reflective Journal (individual): 15% (ESE)

Group work: 15% (ESE)

Written test (individual): 20% (ESE)

These activities include classroom practices and evidence of continuous evaluation throughout the sessions (specified in the program of each subject provided at the beginning of the course) that will be delivered at the end of every class as an evince of attendance and they will be assessed within the individual work.

The evaluation dates will be specified in the program of each group. The delivery of the evidences are planned to be on the following months or time marks:

Portfolio: around session 7 a peer feedback activity will be carried out and around session 13 of the subject the final delivery will take place (beginning of December, 1st semester groups; beginning of May, 2nd semester groups)

Written tests: One week after the last session of the subject (group 1 & 2: 21/12/2026; group 61: 16/12/26; group 62: 21/12/2026; group 21: 19/05/2027; group 31: 19/05/2027; group 41: 31/05/2027; group 51: 04/06/2027)

Reflective Journal: Continuously and weekly students build their journal. Around session 6 there'll be a first deliverable and at the end the rest of the sessions will be delivered. (middle of december, 1st semester groups; middle of may, 2nd semester groups)

Group project: Last class session (December, 1st semester groups; May for the 2nd semester groups)

Reassessment dates:

Group 1 & Group 2: 18/01/27

Group 61: 20/01/27

Group 62: 25/01/27

Group 21: 16/06/27

Group 31: 09/06/27

Group 41: 14/06/27

Group 51: 18/06/27

This subject does not allow unique evaluation

This subject provides for a synthesis test for students enrolled from the second registration onwards, provided that in previous calls they have achieved 80% attendance and have passed both teamwork activities. Students must request this from the subject's teaching staff by email during the first 3 weeks of the semester in which the subject is taught in order to be eligible. The request must be sent via email to the 2 teachers in the group where they are enrolled. The synthesis test will consist of a written test that will assess the Digital Education and Socio-Emotional Education skills and this will be the final grade for the subject. This test will be taken on the same day as the continuous assessment tests.