
Writing and Reading for Academic Purposes I
Code: 106287Credits: 6
| Degree programme | Type | Course |
|---|---|---|
| English Studies | FB | 1 |
| English and Catalan Studies | FB | 1 |
| English and Spanish Studies | FB | 1 |
| English and French Studies | FB | 1 |
| English and Classics Studies | FB | 1 |
Contact lecturer
- Name :
- Jessica Ann Mcdaid
- Email :
- jessica.mcdaid@uab.cat
Teaching staff
- Sebastian Fiquitiva Sierra
- María Sánchez Souto
- Jennifer Rose Ament
Group languages
You can consult this information at the end of the document.
Prerequisites
A CEFR C1 level of general English is required to be able to optimally follow the course.
Objectives
"Writing and Reading for Academic Purposes I" is part of the subject "Academic Skills in English", along with "Speaking and Listening for Academic Purposes I", "Speaking and Listening for Academic Purposes II", "Writing and Reading for Academic Purposes II" and "Seminar on Advanced oral and written expression in English".
The main purpose of this course is to equip students entering the BA in English Studies with consolidated C1 level of English. Specifically, we target the linguistic and communicative tools needed to successfully follow the degree program. This is a foundational course, focused on developing students' formal academic written skills. A starting point of C1 level of English (CEFR) is assumed.
Specific course objectives
At the end of the course students should:
- Have a consolidated instrumental and academic use of the English language to a C1 level in order to later be able to succeed in attaining the core knowledge which constitutes the curriculum of the “Use of the Language” module.
- Produce argumentative texts of around 400 words that are formally well structured, linguistically correct, and have a depth of content appropriate to higher education.
- Understand authentic written materials from the fields of the Humanities and the Social Sciences.
- Reading for gist, reading in detail, close reading and critical reading.
- Identifying author's stance, argumentation, claims and evidence.
Learning outcomes
- Plan work effectively, individually or in groups, in order to fulfil the planned objectives.
- Use appropriate metalanguage to describe the knowledge acquired in relation to the subject.
- Express oneself fluently, correctly, appropriately and effectively, both orally and in writing, in an academic environment.
- Express oneself in English orally and in writing in a formal register and using the appropriate terminology in relation to the characterisation of academic discourse.
- Understand written and oral academic discourse in the field of humanities and social sciences at proficient-user level (C1) and higher-proficient-user level (C2).
- Produce written and oral academic discourses with a fluency and accuracy appropriate to proficient-user level (C1) and higher-proficient-user level (C2) and adapting these to the conventions of distinct genres.
- Modulate written and oral discourse in order to express oneself respectfully and ethically in a context of academic interaction.
- Understand written and oral academic discourse in the field of humanities and social sciences at Advanced User level (C1).
- Produce written and oral academic discourses with a fluency and accuracy appropriate to Advanced User level (C1) and adapt them to the conventions of distinct genres.
- Understand written and oral academic discourse in the field of human and social sciences at an advanced proficient-user level (C1).
- Produce academic written and oral speeches at an advanced proficient-user level (C1) and adapting them to the conventions of the different genders.
- Plan work effectively, individually or in groups, in order to fulfil the planned objectives.
- Understand written and oral academic discourse in the field of humanities and social sciences in English at an advanced proficient-user level (C1).
- Produce written and oral academic discourses with a fluency in English at an advanced proficient-user level (C1) and adapting these to the conventions of distinct genres.
- Understand written and oral academic discourse in the field of humanities and social sciences at an advanced proficient-user level (C1).
- Produce written and oral academic discourses with a fluency and accuracy appropriate at an advanced proficient-user level (C1) and adapting these to the conventions of distinct genres.
Contents
The focus of this course is on written skills (reading and writing). In addition, relevant grammatical structures and lexis of a C1 level belonging to the formal and academic registers will be examined and discussed, either in class or independently, through assigned self-study materials.
- Characteristics of written academic discourse. Conventions, style and structure of formal academic texts in English. Academic English writing.
- The writing process. Brainstorming and generating ideas. The paragraph. Types of paragraphs. Building an argument and supporting ideas. The writing of argumentative essays of 400 words that are formally well structured, linguistically correct, and have a depth of content appropriate to higher education.
- Coherence and cohesion in discourse. Sentence fragments. Run-on sentences. Parallel structures. Agreement. Punctuation.
- Reading academic texts in Humanities (Linguistics and Literature). Identify main and secondary ideas. Reading for gist and reading for detail. Identifying writer's stance. Hedging. Textual analysis.
- Identify and follow the author's argumentation. Practice critical reflection of academic texts.
- Citing and referencing. MLA and APA style. Plagiarism. Appropriate use of AI tools.
- Gender-neutral language.
Learning activities and methodology
| Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guided exercises | 60 | 2.4 | 2, 4, 7, 12 |
| Supervised work | 15 | 0.6 | 2, 4, 7, 12 |
| Self-study. Exercises and assignments. Use of ICTs | 50 | 2 | 2, 4, 7, 12 |
The methodology will be based on the following activities:
- Teacher-led activities (33%)
- Supervised activities (10%)
- Self-study and student led activities (40%)
- Assessment activities (17%)
Teacher-led activities (Theoretical and practical classes)
- Lectures using ICTs and group discussions.
- Practical activities in groups or pairs.
- In-class receptive and productive skills practice.
Self-study and student-led activities
- Language practice with the course books and other reference books.
- Completing reading activities.
- Writing argumentative essays.
- Participation in the reading circles.
- Practice with ICTs and Moodle.
Assessment tasks
- Grammar and vocabulary (UoE) midterm
- Reading midterm
- Academic reading circles (ARCs)
- Final reading exam
- Final writing exam
Assessment
Continuous assessment activities
| Title | Weight | Hours | ECTS | Learning outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Written exam 1 | 30% | 3 | 0.12 | 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15, 16 |
| Midterms | 16% | 4 | 0.16 | 2, 4, 12, 14 |
| Academic reading circles | 6% | 5 | 0.2 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 |
| Continuous Assessment | 18% | 10 | 0.4 | 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12 |
| Written exam 2 | 30% | 3 | 0.12 | 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12 |
• Continuous assessment: 40%
• Final Exam 1 (Reading and Use of English): 30%
• Final Exam 2 (Writing): 30%
Please take note of the following criteria that will be applied to this course:
The exact dates of the assessment activities will be announced at the beginning of the course through the calendar published on the class Moodle.
• Any non-submitted assignments will be graded as 0.
• To be eligible for reassessment, students must have previously been assessed in a set of activities whose combined weighting is equivalent to at least two-thirds of the total continuous assessment grade, provided that they have not failed to submit more than 30% of the assessment activities.
• A student will receive a grade of “Not assessable/not submitted” if they have not submitted more than 30% of the assessment activities.
• To calculate the final average, students must obtain a minimum score of 4.5 in each part of the final exam.
• Only if the student passes both final exams and has attended and participated in at least 80% of the classes and classroom activities will the average grade be calculated, including the continuous assessment marks.
• Students are only eligible to take the final exams if they have submitted at least 30% of the continuous assessment activities.
To pass the course, students must:
• Pass both final exams with a minimum of 50%.
• Achieve a final average grade for the course (considering all assessment activities) equal to or higher than 50%.
Due to the practical nature of this course, students must attend and participate in at least 80% of all training activities (comments, tests, homework, reading circles, attendance, classroom participation, etc.) to be assessed for the 30% of the grade related to practical activities derived directly from in-class work.
The schedule for assessment tasks and exams cannot be modified, except in exceptional and justified cases. Erasmus students or any exchange students requesting to take an exam earlier or change an assessment date must present a written document from their home university justifying the request.
Single Assessment
This course does not allow for a single-assessment (final evaluation-only) option.
Reassessment:
• Only the final exams can be reassessed, and only if the original score is ≥ 35% and < 50%.
• If more than one part of the final exam is not passed (with scores between 3.5 and 4.5), the student may only retake ONE of them.
Assessment activities excluded from reassessment:
Continuous assessment activities cannot be retaken. These include:
• Written exercises, reading exam, midterms, reading circles and other homework assignments.
Grade Review Procedure
At the time each assessment activity takes place, the instructor will inform students (via Moodle) about the procedure and date for reviewing grades.
VERY IMPORTANT:
• If a student commits any irregularity that could lead to a significant change in the grade of an assessment task, that task will be graded with a 0, regardless of any disciplinary proceedings that may follow. If multiple irregularities occur within the assessments for a single course, the final grade for that course will be 0.
• Irregularities include, for example, cheating on an exam, copying from sources without proper attribution, or improper use of AI, such as submitting a work as original when it was generated by an AI tool or program. These assessment activities cannot be reassessed.
• This subject entirely prohibits the use of AI technologies in all of its activites. Any submitted work that contains content generated or modified using AI will be considered academic dishonesty; the corresponding grade will be awarded a zero, without the possibility of reassessment. In cases of greater infringement, more serious action may be taken.
Bibliography
Course Text Books
Kennedy-Scanlon, Michael, Juli Cebrian & John Bradbury (2009) Guided Error Correction: Exercises for Spanish-Speaking Students of English. C1 Level, Book 1. Bellaterrra: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Servei de Publicacions.
McCarthy, Michael & Felicity O’Dell (2016) Academic Vocabulary in Use (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Additional Recommended Resources
Baker, Lida, Robyn Brinks Lockwood & Kristin Donnalley Sherman (2018) Grammar for Great Writing. Boston, MA: National Geographic Learning.
Hewings, Martin. (2023) Advanced Grammar in Use. (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hewings, Martin & Haines, Simon. (2015) Grammar and Vocabulary for Advanced. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Powell, Debra. (2005) Common mistakes at CAE... and how to avoid them. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Other Complimentary Resources
Hewings, Martin & Craig Thaine (2012) Cambridge Academic English. An Integrated Skills Course for EAP. C1 level. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kennedy-Scanlon, Michael, Elisabet Pladevall & Juli Cebrian (2012) Guided Error Correction: Exercises for Spanish-Speaking Students of English. B2 Level. Bellaterrra: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Servei de Publicacions.
Swan, Michael (2016) Practical English Usage (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Recommended Websites:
English for Academic Purposes:
https://www.academic-englishuk.com/
https://www.eapfoundation.com/
Writing websites:
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/index.html
Online dictionaries
https://www.ldoceonline.com (Longman Dictionary of Contemporay English)
https://www.merriam-webster.com(Merrian-Webster dictionaries on line)
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/(Cambridge dictionaries on line)
http://www.freecollocation.com/ (Oxford Collocations Dictionary for Students of English)
https://www.lexilogos.com/english/dictionary.htm (A comprehensive set of resources for the study of the English Language)
Online Pronunciation Dictionaries
Other websites of interest
www.flo-joe.co.uk (Cambridge official examination practice)
www.pbs.org (American public television. Documentaries. American English)
Software
There is no specific program required.
Course groups and languages
The information provided is provisional until November 30. After this date, you will be able to consult the language of each group through this link. To access the information, you will need to enter the course CODE
| Type of teaching | Group | Language | Semester | Shift |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (PAUL) Classroom practices | 1 | English | first semester | morning-mixed |
| (PAUL) Classroom practices | 2 | English | first semester | morning-mixed |
| (PAUL) Classroom practices | 3 | English | first semester | morning-mixed |
| (PAUL) Classroom practices | 4 | English | first semester | morning-mixed |
| (PAUL) Classroom practices | 5 | English | first semester | morning-mixed |