The methodology of this course includes introductory theoretical classes on key aspects, as well as practical sessions and tutorials with case analysis that illustrate the basic issues of the program.

It is imperative for the course's dynamic that students integrate into a work team, as a significant part of the course involves the practical application of the learned content, which consists of producing an audiovisual piece as a team, as well as its public presentation and defence before a jury of industry professionals.

A detailed schedule outlining the content of each session will be presented on the first day of the course and will be available on the course's Virtual Campus, where students will find all teaching materials and necessary information for effective course monitoring. Should the teaching modality change for reasons of force majeure according to the competent authorities, the teaching staff will inform students of any modifications to the course schedule and teaching methodologies.

The content of the subject will be sensitive to aspects related to the gender perspective and the use of inclusive language.

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

The evaluation of the course will consist of three parts that must be passed independently. These are:

-Test-type exam on the theoretical aspects: 30% of the final grade.

-Work with public presentation (presentation of the budget; presentation of the synopsis of the project; presentation of the production plan and artistic approach, and pitching of the project): 20% of the final grade.

-Project production (a short fiction or documentary film between 10 and 15 minutes long): 50% of the final grade.

In order to pass the course, the student must obtain a minimum grade of:

2.5/5 points for the project

1.5/3 points for the Theory Exam

1/2 points of the public presentations of work

A median will not be given if all parts are not passed. In the case of failing one or more parts, the students will have to pass a test designed according to the part they have failed.

The proposed teaching methodology and evaluation may be modified depending on the restrictions imposed by the health authorities.

PLAGIARISM

Suppose a student engages in any form of misconduct that could significantly affect the outcome of an assessment. In that case, they will receive a grade of zero for that particular assessment, regardless of any disciplinary actions that may follow. If multiple instances of misconduct are detected across different assessment components of the same course, the student will receive a final grade of zero for the entire subject.

Non-Assessable

Following point 9 of Article 266 of the UAB Academic Regulations, if it is determined that the student has not provided sufficient evidence to be evaluated, the subject will be classified as non-assessable.

Artificial Intelligence

In this course, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted as an integral part of assignment development, provided that the final outcome demonstrates a significant contribution from the student in terms of analysis and personal reflection. Students must clearly identify any content generated using AI, specify the tools employed, and include a critical reflection on how these technologies have influenced both the process and the final result of the assignment. Failure to disclose the use of AI in this assessed activity will be considered a breach of academic integrity and may result in a partial or total penalty to the assignment grade, or more serious sanctions in severe cases.