There will be two hours of theory and one hour of seminar per week.

Seminars will focus on deontological issues.

A detailed schedule outlining the content of each session will be presented on the first day of the course and will be available on the course’s Virtual Campus, where students will find all teaching materials and necessary information for effective course monitoring. Should the teaching modality change for reasons of force majeure according to the competent authorities, the teaching staff will inform students of any modifications to the course schedule and teaching methodologies.

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

Activity A: Partial theory test, 20% of the final grade. Material covered in this test will not be excluded in final test.

Activity B: Seminar test (or tests), 30% of the final grade.

Activity C: Final theory test, 50% of the final grade.

Students are required to pass the final theory test in order to pass the course.

There will be a re-sit opportunity only in the case of the final theory test,

The single assessment will consist of taking all the tests on the same day (the day of the final theory test), consecutively. As in the continuous evaluation system, only the final theory test will be re-assessable.

No synthesis test is planned.

A \"not evaluable\" will be assigned when activity C has not been completed.

In this course, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted as an integral part of assignment development, provided that the final outcome demonstrates a significant contribution from the student in terms of analysis and personal reflection. Students must clearly identify any content generated using AI, specify the tools employed, and include a critical reflection on how these technologies have influenced both the process and the final result of the assignment. Failure to disclose the use of AI in this assessed activity will be considered a breach of academic integrity and may result in a partial or total penalty to the assignment grade, or more serious sanctions in severe cases.

The performance of any irregularity in an evaluation act (academic fraud, plagiarism or improper use of AI, unless this use is expressly authorized by the teaching guide), which may lead to a significant variation in the grade, assumes that this act will be graded with a 0. In the event that the teaching guide foresees that in order to pass the subject it is an essential requirement to have obtained a minimum grade in this evaluation act or that there are several irregularities in the evaluation acts of the same subject, the final grade of this subject is 0. Apart from this, a disciplinary process may be instructed to the student that incurs any of these irregularities.