The course combines lectures with in-class exercises. The methodology will be service learning for a research center.

A detailed schedule outlining the content of each session will be presented on the first day

of the course and will be available on the course’s Virtual Campus, where students will

find the various teaching materials deemed appropriate by the instructors and

necessary information for effective course monitoring.

Should the teaching modality change for reasons of force majeure according to the

competent authorities, the teaching staff will inform students of any modifications to the

course schedule and teaching methodologies.

Note: The course content will be sensitive to issues related to gender perspective and the

use of inclusive language.

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

CONTINUOUS EVALUATION

The evaluation of the subject is summative and includes the following activities:

A. Project (50%): The project consists of a set of group and individual activities that allow the student to learn how to manage a real project.

B. Test (25%): written test to assess knowledge of the theoretical concepts of the subject.

C. Project presentations(25%): oral presentations of a project where the formal, design, and communication aspects will be evaluated.

It is mandatory to participate in all evaluation activities in order to obtain the final grade. In case of justified reasons (health, death, or serious family problem), the activities can be done on alternative dates indicated by the coordinator.

The grades of each activity will be published on the Virtual Campus and queries or rectifications can be made up to 10 days after their publication. After this period, the grade cannot be modified.

Any written work that has five spelling errors and/or barbarisms (adding 5 errors in total) will get a zero mark. Any job with a plagiarism percentage that exceeds the usual rules of the authors' rights will also obtain a zero mark. To detect possible plagiarism, computerized procedures may be applied to the digital files of the submitted works, either by applying them to all or only to random samples. The student who makes any irregularity (copying, plagiarism, identity theft...) that may lead to a significant variation in the mark of an assessment act, will be rated 0 in this assessment act. In the event of several irregularities, the final grade for the course will be 0.

Revaluation

Students who fail the course in the continuous evaluation (the result of the sum of the evaluation activities) may choose to apply for a revaluation of the course. The revaluation test will consist of an exam on all the content taught throughout the theory and practice classes. Students will have the right to the revaluations of the subject if it has been evaluated from the set of activities, the weight of which is a minimum of 2/3 parts of the total mark for the course. To be able to apply for the course revaluation, it will be necessary to obtain a minimum average grade of 3.5.

Single evaluation

The single evaluation system of the course is based on the following percentages:

A) 25% Theoretical test It will have to be passed (5 or more) to pass the course (indispensable condition) The exam model is different from that of the continuous evaluation.

The exam model is different from that of the continuous evaluation.

B) 25% Presentation of a project (oral presentation where the formal, design and communication aspects will be evaluated).

C) 50% Submission of a final project: development of an app for the university community.

A(25%)+ B (25%)+ C (50%)= 100% FINAL COURSE SCORE

Reevaluation:

a) According to the regulations, in order to participate in the recovery process, the student must have been

previously evaluated at least 2/3 of the total number of evaluable activities of the course.

b) The theory test can only be recovered if the student has obtained a grade lower than 4.9. The recovery test will consist of a written test to evaluate theoretical knowledge.

c) The grade obtained in the presentation of a project will be part of the weighted average of the final grade. Only in case of failing this test and if the student considers so, he/she will be able to recover the grade with a test of the same nature.

d) The final work is not recoverable and the grade obtained (whether passed or not) will be part of the weighted average of the final grade.

SECOND ENROLLMENT:

In case of second enrollment, students may take a single synthesis test consisting of a content control and some practical exercises. The grade of the coursewill correspond to the grade of the synthesis test. The student who wants to do this synthesis test must communicate it in writing to the coordinator of the course.

Not Assessed

According to section 9 of article 266 of the UAB Academic Regulations, “when it is considered that the student has not been able to provide sufficient assessment evidence, the course must be graded as Not Assessed.”

AI

In this course, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is not permitted at any

stage. Any assignment containing content generated by AI will be considered a breach of

academic integrity and may result in a partial or total penalty to the assignment grade, or

more serious sanctions in severe cases.

Irregularities

The performance of any irregularity in an evaluation act (academic fraud, plagiarism or

improper use of AI, unless this use is expressly authorized by the teaching guide),

which may lead to a significant variation in the grade, assumes that this act will be

graded with a 0. In the event that the teaching guide foresees that in order to pass the

subject it is an essential requirement to have obtained a minimum grade in this

evaluation act or that there are several irregularities in the evaluation acts of the same

subject, the final grade of this subject is 0. Apart from this, a disciplinary process may

be instructed to the student that incurs any of these irregularities.

Actions in case of irregularities

Any student suspected of submitting assignments that have been generated by AI,

written by others or copied; include unattributed AI-generated content, or fall

outside the permitted scope, may be asked to provide the preliminary work or

other materials that can demonstrate it is original work and the result of their own

authorship. They may also be asked to separately explain or justify their work.

Teachers may also use AI detection systems or carry out any verification tasks

they deem appropriate. If, after review, the instructor detects irregularities, the

assignment may be graded zero, and the student may be subject to further

disciplinary action.