Classroom activities will be divided into two categories:

1. Reading and interpreting literary themes and topics. This activity will be carried out with the support of an anthology of Greek and Latin texts that will serve as a starting point for the explanation and the commentary of the formal and thematic characteristics of each of the literary genres included in the course program. The anthology will be uploaded in Campus Virtual.

2. Participation in the classroom activities.

The accomplishment of the competences of the subject will be achieved largely with the autonomous work of each student, that will be oriented to:

1. The preparation of two text commentaries, which will be defended orally.

2. Complementary texts reading, both of classic authors as well as modern bibliography on the themes and works studied.

Given that numerous scientific studies show that reading on paper improves the understanding and memorization of the contents, while facilitating critical reflection, it is strongly recommended that all the materials available on the Virtual Campus are printed and that the activities and exercises are always work on paper. If, despite this recommendation, students prefer to use digital devices (tablets or computers), it must be clear that they cannot be used for anything other than learning activities. The use of mobile phones in class is not allowed.

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

This subject does not allow a single assessment.

Continuous evaluation

Continuous evalutaion is a process that must allow students to know their academic progress throughout the course. The evaluation activities that will be taken into account are :

1. Two theoretical and practical tests, each of which will have a weight of 35% on the final mark
2. Two text commentaries on two passages included in the dossier which will be presented orally, with a weight of 10% on the final mark.
3. A test on a compulsory reading of a classic work, which will be worth 10% of the final mark.
4. Attendance and participation in the activities proposed in class, which will be worth 10% of the final grade.

Erasmus and exchange students who request to advance an exam must present a document from their home university justifying their request.

Plagiarism

In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for this activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.

Not assessable

Students will receive the grade of "Not assessable" as long as they has not delivered more than 30% of the assessment.

Procedure for the review of qualifications

On carrying out each evaluation activity, lecturers will inform students (on Moodle) of the procedures to be followed for reviewing all grades awarded, and the date on which such a review will take place.

Reassessment process

• In order to be entitled to participate in the reassessment activities, the student must have been previously evaluated in a set of activities whose weight equals to a minimum of 2/3 of the total score.
• To be able to participate in the reassessment process the student must have obtained a minimum mark of 3.5 on the average grade of the subject.
• In case of not having passed the set (and if the average grade reaches a minimum of 3.5 points), it will be possible to retake one of the theoretical-practical tests (35%), a text commentary to be written on the reassessment day (5%), and the reading test (10%).

AI

This subject allows the use of AI technologies exclusively for support tasks such as bibliographic searches, text correction or translations. The student must clearly (i) identify which parts have been generated using AI technology; (ii) specify the tools used; and (iii) include if necessary a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and final outcome of the activity. Lack of transparency regarding the use of AI in the assessed activity will be considered academic dishonesty; the corresponding grade may be lowered, or the work may even be awarded a zero. In cases of greater infringement, more serious action may be taken.