The learning process is based on the work of the person enrolled in it, who learns by working, with the mission of the teaching staff to help them by providing information, showing them sources of knowledge and supervising the work.

The development of the teaching of the subject and the training of the student is based on the following activities:

1. Directed activities:

1.1 Lectures: The theory teacher will explain the fundamental concepts of each topic to deepen and work in the seminars in a practical way. The student achieves the conceptual bases of the subject and learns the legal and regulatory framework. The theoretical class does not necessarily have to involve a passive position of the students since it can be built by both parties or theoretical knowledge can be produced by the students by applying technology. Theoretical content can be worked on from questions that students ask in the classroom or that the teaching staff formulates, from a news item that has appeared in the press, etc...

1.2. Seminars: Attendance at seminars is mandatory. At the beginning of the course, the teaching staff will propose the activities they consider relevant for the purposes of continuous assessment by publishing a calendar with the schedule of activities in the Moodle classroom. These are activities that students will carry out in the classroom, with the supervision and support of the teaching staff.

2. Autonomous activities: They are fundamentally those related to the study of the subject to assume basic knowledge of it. In addition to the study, they include, among others:

2.1. The preparation of documents: these are those required by the seminars. They can be in relation to practical cases proposed in advance or that must be created by the students. Part of the autonomous activity is a partial exam, the specific form of which is determined by the teaching staff of each group.

2.2. Search for bibliography and instrumental jurisprudence for the resolution of the seminars and the preparation of the exam.

2.3. Comprehensive reading of legal texts: The texts can be judgments, journal articles, monographs. The type of text will be determined by the teachers of each group.

Part of the material for the activities is made available to students through the Virtual Campus.

Note: 15 minutes of a class will be reserved, within the calendar established by the center/degree, for students to complete the surveys to evaluate the performance of the teachers and to evaluate the subject.

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

EVALUATION SYSTEM OF THE ACQUISITION OF SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS SYSTEM

ORDINARY EVALUATION AND QUALIFICATION SYSTEM:

I. Continuous evaluation:

The continuous assessment is made up of three main parts:

The first part is the realization of practical activities that will be carried out at home and discussed in class. The students will not have to present anything in writing unless the teaching staff so indicate. This part has a value of 20%.

The second part is the completion of a non-liberating partial exam. The partial will consist of a first test-type part and a second part of theoretical questions to be developed. The value of this part is 15%.

The third part is the so-called reverse teaching, where the student will have to deliver a video about the content of a subject of the program that the professor will assign to him. The value of this part is 15%.

The remaining 50% to obtain the approved subject will be made up of the final exam. The final exam will consist of three theoretical questions to be developed.

Not assessable:

Students will be assessable as long as they have completed a set of activities whose weight is equivalent to a minimum of 2/3 of the subject's total grade. If the value of the activities carried out does not reach this threshold, the teaching staff of the subject may consider the student as not assessable.

II. Final exam

Students will be able to take the final exam regardless of the grade obtained in the continuous assessment.

The subject will only be passed if a grade of 4 out of 10 or higher is obtained in the final exam.

The specific type of final exam will be written. Students are examined for the entire subject program, even if for academic or extra-academic reasons it has not been possible to give all the content in the lectures.

III. Subject qualification with the continuous assessment system

The score obtained in the continuous assessment will be worth 50% of the subject's grade. The final exam score will be worth 50% of the subject's grade.

Continuous assessment note: it will consist of the notes obtained in the practical activities proposed in the seminars, as well as the active participation and the partial exams carried out during the course.

Final exam grade: in order to pass the subject, the final exam must be passed with a minimum grade of 4 out of 10.

The subject will be approved by obtaining a minimum of 5 out of 10, in accordance with the established percentages.

IV.- Single evaluation:

Content of the single assessment

The single assessment must have the same level of complexity and demand as the continuous assessment and in it the students must demonstrate the acquisition of the knowledge and skills specific to each subject.

In any case, the single assessment, like the continuous assessment, must include a minimum of three assessable activities, of two different types, none of which can represent more than 50% of the final grade.

In the event that it is required to present evidence that the student has carried out his learning independently during the academic year, on the single assessment date it must be verified that the student has acquired the knowledge and skills planned

The single assessment will consist of the following tests, which must be carried out individually and individually for each student, on the official date scheduled for the final exam:

a) the resolution of a transversal practical case, where the student will have to answer the questions asked about the case. (40%)

b) the completion of a quiz, where incorrect questions and those left blank will penalize. (20%)

c) the completion of a written test of theoretical content, where students will have to demonstrate their knowledge of the subject's program. (40%)

Not assessable:

The same non-evaluable criterion will be applied as for the continuous evaluation.

V. RE-ASSESSMENT

To access the re-assessment, a minimum grade of 3 out of 10 must be obtained for the subject, whether the student has opted for the single assessment or the continuous assessment. Students are examined for the entire program of the subject.

To access the re-assessment, it is necessary to have taken the final exam.

The subject will be passed with a minimum of 5 out of 10, according to the established percentages. The final grade will be a maximum of a pass.

In the re-assessment exam, students are examined for 100% of the subject without taking into account the grade of the continuous assessment.

Students who have opted for the single assessment will have the same type of exam as the final exam carried out in the single assessment: it must include a minimum of three assessable activities, of two different types, none of which can represent more than 50% of the final grade.

IMPORTANT: In the event that the student copies, commits plagiarism or is discovered using any prohibited device in any assessment test, the teaching staff will grade him/her with a 0 in this assessment act, and will notify the Dean of the Faculty of the fact by submitting a report on the circumstances and evidence of the fact produced to request the opening of a possible disciplinary file against the student. This assessment activity will not be recoverable. In the event that more than one irregularity occurs in the assessment acts of the same subject, the final grade for this subject is 0.

USE OF AI

For this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted exclusively in support tasks, such as bibliographic or information searches, text correction or translations. The student must clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final result of the activity. The lack of transparency in the use of AI in this assessable activity will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may lead to a partial or total penalty in the grade of the activity, or greater sanctions in serious cases.