Preliminary Note

Attendance at seminars, except for justified cases, will be mandatory for students.

The teaching of the subject and the training of the students is based on the following activities:

1. Directed activities:

1.1 Master classes: where the students reach the conceptual bases of the subject and the legal and jurisprudence framework. The master classes are the activities in which the student is required less interactivity and are conceived as an exhibition to establish conceptual references in each topic.

1.2. Seminars: where students, in small groups, analyze previously developed practical cases together with teachers. In specific cases, the cases will be prepared in class. The basis of the practical work is the understanding and application of the concepts explained in the theoretical classes.

1.3. Evaluation: continuous assessment activities (the nature of which will be informed by the person in charge of the group: written, oral, presentations, etc.) and final exam.

2. Supervised activities:

These are activities that the students develop in the classroom, with the supervision and support of the teaching staff. It is the elaboration of some practical assumption in the classroom.

3. Autonomous activities:

3.1. Preparation of documents of practical activities: which will be delivered and analyzed in the classroom.

3.2. Search for bibliography and instrumental materials for the resolution of practical cases. In some cases, students will have to do the autonomous search of the documentation.

IMPORTANT: In the event that the student copies, quotes plagiarism or is discovered with a prohibited device in any evaluation test, the teacher will rate it with a 0 in this evaluation act, and will notify the fact to the Decanate of the Facultancy by presenting a report on the circumstances and evidence of the fact produced to request the opening of an eventual disciplinary file to the student. This evaluation activity will not be recoverable. In the event that more than one irregularity occurs in the evaluation acts of the same subject, the final grade of this subject is 0.

In each teaching group, the specific date or week of carrying out the evaluable activities will be published on the Virtual Campus before the beginning of teaching, without prejudice to the fact that, exceptionally and due to reasons of force majeure, these may, with sufficient notice and advance notice, be modified.

Students will be evaluable provided that they have carried out a set of activities whose weight is equivalent to a minimum of 2/3 of the total grade of the subject. If the value of the activities carried out does not reach this threshold, the teacher responsible for the subject may consider the student as \"not evaluable\".

The final grade of the subject will be obtained from the following elements:

Continuous evaluation. Attendance at seminars, except for justified cases, will be mandatory for students. The typology of the evaluable tests will be notified by the person responsible for the group in advance: practical cases, oral presentations, argumentation and debate, participation, exams, etc.

Seminar tests (50% of the grade): 1st Seminar test (25%) + 2nd Seminar test (25%).

Final exam: 50% of the grade.

The final exam must be passed with a qualification higher than 5 to average with the rest of the continuous assessment grades.

Single Assessment (Guidelines)

First Activity (25%). Reading comprehension.

Second Activity (25%). Essay question.

Common activity (50% of the note). Same task as final exam.

The same \"non-evaluable\" criterion will be applied as for the continuous evaluation.

Re-evaluation

There will be a re-evaluation just of the part related to the final exam. For single assessment students, the same re-evaluation system will be applied as for continuous assessment.

Themaximum grade in the re-evaluation cannot be higher than 6.

Use of AI

Restricted use: For this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is allowed exclusively in the bibliographic or information search and the correction of texts in classroom activities. The students will have to clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final result of the activity. The non-transparency of the use of AI in this evaluable activity will be considered lack of academic honesty and may lead to a partial or total penalty in the grade of the activity, or greater penalties in cases of severity.