The learning process focuses on the work of the student, who learns working individually and in groups, the mission of the teaching staff being to help him in this task by providing information and showing him the techniques and sources where it can be obtained. The development of teaching of the subject and student training is based on the following activities:

1. Directed activities: responds to a predetermined time schedule, which requires the face-to-face direction of the teaching staff and is developed in groups

1.1. Theoretical class: where the student acquires through the transmission of knowledge from the professor the conceptual bases of the subject and establishes the doctrinal, normative and jurisprudential legal framework.

1.2. Seminar: they will occupy the assigned hours. The student individually or in small groups, analyzes and solves, together with the professor, questions, practical cases or news related to the topic just developed in the theoretical class. Attendance at the seminars, except if there is just cause, is mandatory.

1.3 Assestement.

2. Supervised activities: it can be developed autonomously, although it requires more or less punctual supervision from teaching staff

Tutorials

3. Autonomous activities: these are activities in which students organize their time and effort independently, either individually or in groups.

3.1 Study of the subject.

3.2 Reading of documents that will be analyzed in the classroom.

3.3 Search of bibliography, jurisprudence and materials for the resolution of practical cases.

Continuous evaluation:

- Final theoretical exam to be carried out on the date officially indicated by the academic secretary. You will receive 50% of the note. The teaching team corresponding to each of the groups will indicate the format of this exam.

- A minimum of two other evaluation activities with a total weight in the mark of 50% and with the following percentages:

- evaluation activities 25 % (e.g., non-releaseable midterm, case studies or seminar activities)

- evalutation activities 25% (e.g. reviews, book reviews, research papers, scheme of case law or rules, reports and opinions, or active class participation throughout the subject, of quality, legally based, appropriate and relevant to the topics covered).

The list of these possible activities will be specified by each teaching team at the beginning of the course and on the Virtual Campus. The selected activities may be carried out individually or in groups, depending on what the teaching team decides

The teaching team of each group, at the beginning of the course, will specify the framework program of the subject provided in this guide, explaining the order and the topics to be discussed. It will also present the schedule of teaching activities (theory and seminars), specify the continuous evaluation system that has been selected and set the percentage assigned to each of the selected activities and their date of completion, as well as the re-evaluation system for suspended activities . Such indications will be displayed on the virtual campus.

In the final overall test, students must obtain a minimum of 5 to pass the subject. In this case, if this minimum grade is not achieved, the subject will be suspended. The reevaluation can only be carried out if the students have followed the continuous evaluation.

Re-evaluation: no minimum grade is required to appear.

Non-evaluable students: this situation occurs when the student has not been able to provide sufficient evidence for evaluation of the subject (art 266.9 UAB Academic Regulations). Students will be evaluable as long as they have carried out a set of activities whose weight is equivalent to a minimum of 2/3 of the total grade for the subject. If the value of the activities carried out does not reach this threshold, the subject teacher may consider the student as non-evaluable.

Unique evaluation:

The teaching team of each group will establish the system and the unique evaluation activities that will be applicable to the student body that has requested and has been granted this system. Students who have taken the unique evaluation will only be entitled to reevalution if they have obtained a grade equal to or greater than 3.5 points out of 10.

The teaching team of each group will establish the unique evalutation system and activities that will be applicable to students who have requested and have been granted this unique evaluation system. This unique assessment will consist of three parts and aims to enable students to accredit that they have achieved the objectives and learning outcomes, skills and competences established for the subject. The first part will consist of a test or exam of the whole subject with similar characteristics to the one taken in the final exam of the continuous evaluation, which will have a weight of 50% of the mark. The second part will refer to what has been done in the seminars and practicals with a weight of 25% of the final mark, while the third part will focus on one or more of the activities carried out in accordance with the list mentioned above with a weight of the remaining 25%.

This unique evaluation will have, as a whole, a degree of similar difficulty to that required in the continuous evaluation.

Reevaluation: the same criteria will be applied as for continuous evaluation.

Non-evaluable students: the same non-evaluable criteria will be applied as for continuous evaluation.

3. In any case, specific instructions on the single evaluation and reevaluation will also be given at the beginning of the course and will be displayed on the virtual campus of the subject of each group.

4. IMPORTANT: Should a student cheat, commit plagiarism or be found in possession of a prohibited device during an assessment, the lecturer will award a mark of 0 for that assessment, and will report the incident to the Faculty Dean’s Office by submitting a report on the circumstances and evidence of the incident in order to request the initiation of any disciplinary proceedings against the student. This assessment will not be retaken. Should more than one irregularity occur in the assessment components of the same module, the final mark for that module shall be 0.

Restricted use of Artificial Intelligence (AI):

For this module, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted exclusively for support purposes, such as bibliographic or information searches, text correction or translations, and other specific situations as deemed appropriate by the teaching staff. Students must clearly identify which parts have been generated using this technology, specify the tools used, and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final outcome of the activity. A lack of transparency regarding the use of AI in this assessed activity will be considered a breach of academic integrity and may result in a partial or total deduction from the mark for the activity, or more severe sanctions in serious cases.