In this subject, the essential knowledge will be acquired to be able to evaluate and intervene in the different alterations of the voice. The necessary theory will be addressed to create a good theoretical foundation that will be complemented with the analysis of real cases. During the party group seminars, the theoretical content can be put into practice. It aims to be a very experiential subject and from an eminently practical point of view.

Following the guidelines for the evaluation of the degrees of the Faculty of Psychology (see this link https://www.uab.cat/web/estudiar/graus/graus/avaluacions-1345722525858.htm), the guidelines for the evaluation of this subject is the following:

A) Definition of passed subject: To successfully pass this subject it is necessary to obtain a grade of 5,0 points out of 10 or higher, in each of the evidences of learning that are detailed in the following table:

B) Remedial tests: Those students who have not met the criteria established to pass the subject and who have previously been assessed in a set of activities whose weight is equivalent to a minimum of two thirds of the total grade of the subject.

C) Definition of the different pieces of evidence:

1. EV1: assessment in the form of a test-type exam that will account for 35% of the total mark. Failure to achieve a 5,0 out of 10of this evidence gives the right to a make-up exam or compensatory work at the teacher's discretion.

2. EV3: test-type assessment plus an open essay question, about a case, which will account for 45% of the subject's final mark. Failure to pass this evidence gives the right to his recovery with another exam or compensatory work.

3. EV2: assessment with an oral presentation of case analysis. Attendance at seminars is mandatory at a minimum of 80%. This minimum attendance plus the case presentation make it possible to qualify for 20% of the final grade for this evidence. Active and participatory attendance during the sessions will be taken into account. The teaching staff reserves the right to request a written exercise on the seminars carried out. If any student cannot attend the minimum number of seminars requested, even for justified reasons, they will be entitled to recovery with compensatory work proposed by the teachers according to the seminars of interest.

D) Single assessment:For students who properly request the single assessment, EV1 (60 minutes) and EV3 (90 minutes) are proposed on the same day and continuously and simultaneously to the rest of the students on the day of the final assessment of the subject The percentages will be the same as the continuous assessment. These students must follow the subject program and attend the seminars as well. EV2 (20%) will be assessed by means of a paper or a case analysis which must be handed the day of the exam. THE UNIQUE EVALUATION IS REQUESTED TELEMATICALLY (E-FORM) IN THE SPECIFIC PERIOD (more information on the Faculty's website).

E) Return: grades will be notified via virtual campus.

F) Retake: Definition of passed: In accordance with the Faculty's assessment guidelines, the definition of a subject passed in the continuous assessment, on a scale of 0-10, must necessarily include having obtained a minimum grade of 5.0 points in each of the face-to-face assessment tests that have a contribution equal to or greater than 20% of the grade of this continuous assessment. In the event of not meeting these requirements, and any others that the subject may establish, the maximum grade to be recorded in the academic record will be 4.5 points.

The delivery of the translation of the face-to-face assessment tests will be carried out if the requirements established in article 263 are met and your request is made in week 4 electronically (e-form) (more information on the faculty'swebsite ).

AI use:

Model 2 - Restricted use: “For this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is allowed exclusively in support tasks, such as bibliographic or information search, text correction or translations. It is prohibited to use AI in the final result of learning evidence. The student will have to clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final result of the activity. The lack of transparency of the use of AI in this assessable activity will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may lead to a partial or total penalty in the grade of the activity, or greater sanctions in cases of seriousness.”