DIRECTED ACTIVITY

• Theoretical classes, practical and seminars
• Lectures with ICT support and debate in a large group
• Practical classes to discuss basic concepts through small exercises
• Seminars for discussion of cases or papers in small groups
• Workshops for proposals for intervention or rehabilitation
• Throughout the course, equal participation in class will be fostered.

SUPERVISED ACTIVITY

• Individual tutoring with the teacher.
• Follow-up tutoring in small groups.
• Individual and group writing tasks
• Tutoring of work (individual or group) in person and/or online.

AUTONOMOUS ACTIVITY

• Document search, reading and synthesis.
• Definition of search strategy in databases, close reading and preparation of synopses of the material read.
• Preparation of reports and public presentation of papers.
• Preparation of reports on individual or group practicals.

The competencies of this subject will be evaluated by means of different pieces of evidence to be held in different weeks:

Evidence 1. What do we want to learn? 15% (In class, before the 1st evaluation period)

Evidence 2. 30 % intervention plan (In class, before the 2nd evaluation period)

Evidence 3. Oral presentation 25% (In class, before the 2nd evaluation period)

Evidence 4. Learners experiences collection 30% (Second Evaluation Period)

Attendance is required in order to complete these assessment activities.

A student will be considered to have passed the course if, across the four assessment activities, they obtain an overall score of 5.0 or higher and achieve at least 4.0 in Assessment Activity 4 (Learning Portfolio). Students who do not submit all assessment activities will not pass the course, even if their overall grade is 5.0 or higher.

Students who do not attend any of the talks included in Assessment Activity 4 (AA4) will not be able to complete the activities associated with that talk, nor will they be able to make them up. AA4 consists of approximately three talks.

Once the course has been passed (grade ≥ 5.0), no mechanisms may be established to improve the final grade after the course/module has been passed (based on Article 116, Section 5 of the UAB Regulations).

A student who has submitted learning activities accounting for 4.0 points (40%) or more of the final grade will be recorded as “assessable”.

The resit examination may only be taken by students whose continuous assessment grade is at least 3.5 but below 5.0. To be eligible for this examination, students must previously have been assessed through activities whose combined weight represents at least two-thirds of the total course grade.

This resit examination will correspond to the assessment activities that were not passed and cannot be used to improve the grade of a student who has already passed the course.

The highest final grade that a student can obtain in the course after taking the resit examination is 5.0.

Definition of a pass: In accordance with the Faculty’s assessment guidelines, for a course to be considered passed through continuous assessment, on a 0–10 scale, students must obtain a minimum overall grade of 5.0 and a grade of at least 4.0 in each in-person assessment activity that contributes 20% or more to the final continuous assessment grade. If these requirements, as well as any other requirements established by the course, are not met, the maximum grade that may be recorded in the academic transcript will be 4.5.

Students enrolled for the second or subsequent time will not be assessed through a single non-recoverable comprehensive examination.

This course does not offer a single-assessment option.

The translation of in-person assessment tests will only be provided if the requirements established in Article 263 are met and the request is submitted electronically (e-form) during Week 4 (more information on the Faculty website).

For this course, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted exclusively for support tasks, such as bibliographic or information searches and text correction. Students must clearly identify which parts have been generated using these technologies, specify the tools used, and include a critical reflection on how they influenced the process and the final outcome of the activity. Failure to disclose the use of AI in an assessed activity will be considered a breach of academic integrity and may result in a partial or total grade penalty, or more severe sanctions in serious cases.

COPYING OR PLAGIARISM: According to Article 116, Section 10 of the UAB Regulations, if a student commits any irregularity (copying, plagiarism, impersonation, forgery of signatures on attendance lists, or any other dishonest academic conduct) that may significantly affect the grade of an assessment activity, that activity will be graded 0.0. If several irregularities occur in the assessment activities of the same course/module, the final course grade will be 0.0.

More information on assessment regulations:

https://www.uab.cat/web/estudiar/graus/graus/avaluacions-1345722525858.html