Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

The exam may include questions on the topics covered in class and on the compulsory readings.

The article must be an analysis of a fiction film. In the process of choosing it, the student must make a proposal to the teacher to obtain his approval.

The small-scale work will be a review of a book related to the syllabus. In the process of choosing the book to review, the student will have to make a proposal to the teacher to obtain his approval.

At the time of completion/delivery of each assessment activity, the teacher will inform of the procedure and date of revision of the grades.

All assessment activities will be reassessed independently, maintaining their weight in the final grade.

In order to pass the continuous assessment, it is necessary to achieve an average grade equal to or higher than 5 in the three assessable activities. It is also necessary to have passed a grade of 4 in the final exam.

The student will be classified as Non-evaluable when he has not delivered more than 30% of the evaluation activities.

The single evaluation option will consist of a written exam, which will include two general development questions (50%), a case study (25%) and an analysis of primary sources (25%). The same assessment method as continuous assessment will be used. Choosing the single assessment does not exempt the student from attending classes.

To participate in the second-chance examination, the student must have previously been evaluated in a set of activities whose weight is equivalent to a minimum of 2/3 of the total grade (CONTINUED ASSESSMENT) or submit all the tests planned (SINGLE ASSESSMENT).

In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for this activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place.In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject,the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.

This subject entirely prohibits the use of AI technologies in all of its activities. Any submitted work that contains content generated using AI will be considered academic dishonesty; thecorresponding grade will be awarded a zero, without the possibility of reassessment. In cases of greater infringement, more serious action may be taken.

Assessment dates can’t be changed unless there’s an exceptional and well-justified reason. If a student has a documented chronic or acute illness, they can request to postpone the assessment, if it fits within the academic calendar. These requests must be submitted at least seven days in advance and include the required documentation. If the reason is an unexpected situation considered force majeure, the regulations allow the request to be submitted after the scheduled date, provided the documentation is delivered within three

working days. This includes situations such as the birth or adoption of a child, or the death of a partner or a close relative (up to second degree). In cases of illness or other circumstances, the documentation must clearly show that the student was not in a condition to take the assessment at the scheduled time. Teaching staff may also use their discretion to consider other circumstances not explicitly listed above.

Erasmus students who need to leave before the scheduled assessment dates must provide an official document from their home university, addressed to the Degree Exchange Coordinator, confirming a calendar conflict (an overlap with academic activities at their home institution). Erasmus and exchange students who request to advance an exam must present a document from their home university justifying their request.