All face-to-face sessions will be with the whole class group. However, as indicated in the methodology, there will be sessions where small group work will be done in the classroom under the supervision of the teacher.The methodology will include the following types of activities:- Teacher exhibition.- Use of the virtual campus. Discussion forums.- Cooperative work.- Student exhibitions.- Personal work of students.- Case study and practical work in the classroom.- Mechanisms of linking the theory and work done with the sessions of the PracticumThe proposed teaching methodology and assessment may undergo some modification depending on the attendance restrictions imposed by the health authorities. 
\"The proposed methodology involves a face-to-face development of the subject. If it were necessary to move to a semi-face-to-face development, the theoretical part 
it would be done by videoconference (through teams) and the practical part would be done in person, but dividing the group into two subgroups.
If it were necessary to return to a confinement everything would be done through teams and the virtual campus.
In any case it would always be synchronously according to the timeline of the subject

Students may choose between continuous evaluation and single evaluation.

Specific validations can be made to ensure authorship and competence acquisition in case of suspected academic fraud.

In order to be entitled to the evaluation in any of the modalities, the following are requirements:

- Compulsory attendance to a minimum of 80% of the class sessions.

- The delivery of all practices and evaluation exercises within the indicated deadlines.

- No single evaluation activity may represent more than 50% of the final grade of the module. In case the student does not pass an evaluable part, it will be guaranteed the possibility of recovering, at least, 50% of the score corresponding to this part. The recovery will have to be made during Phase V, before the beginning of the writing of the Master's Final Project (TFM), and will be adjusted to the conditions -data and format- established by the teacher responsible for the failed activity.

- The comments and/or grades of the activities released by the student will be provided within a maximum period of 20 working days.

The use of artificial intelligence tools is permitted as a learning support resource, provided that their use is explicitly declared by the student and does not replace personal contribution, critical reasoning, or the achievement of the course competencies. Teaching staff may require an oral defense or an individual interview to verify the authorship of and understanding demonstrated in the submitted work. In addition, open and participatory classroom discussions may be conducted, which will enrich the assessment process and carry significant weight according to the criteria established by the instructor. Any improper use of AI that may constitute academic misconduct will result in a grade of zero for the affected activity and may lead to the initiation of disciplinary proceedings.

Continuous evaluation mode:

The set of evaluation activities will be as follows:

Key concepts and problem solving (30% of the module).

50% of the evaluation in a final work in groups of maximum 3, 40% of the work or activities throughout the course in groups and the other 10% attendance and participation.

The deadline for submitting the work will be the last day of classes of this part.

Mathematical Modeling (30% of the module)

The evaluation will be based on the works and activities proposed by the teacher responsible for this part of the module. It is expected that the students will make a presentation in the classroom about the developed works, which will take place during the last two days of the sessions corresponding to this part. A 10% of the final grade will be given for attendance and active participation in class.

Key topics of mathematics from a historical perspective (40% of the module).

The evaluation is distributed with a weight of 50% for the final work and 40% for thegroup work of the activities proposed. 10% attendance and participation in class. The deadline for handing in the work will be the last day of the classes of this part.

The work, for any of the groups, must be delivered within the deadlines indicated by the respective teachers of each group.

Modality by single evaluation:

The students who opt for the single evaluation will have to release the work previously set by the teacher of each block on the last day of the module (or the day designated by the single evaluation). On the same day, the student must take a written exam of the module consisting of three parts, one for each block. The final score of the block will be made up of 20% of the grade of the work and/or activities done, 10% of the class attendance and 70% of the grade of the exam corresponding to the block.

The final grade for the module will be, as indicated in the teaching guide, 40% for the history part, 30% for the problem solving part and 30% for the modeling part.

Summary of both modalities:

The final grade becomes from the result of the operation:

0.3 x key concepts and problem solving grade + 0.3 x modeling grade + 0.4 x historical perspective grade.

It will be mandatory to have a grade equal or higher than 4 points in each part to make the average.

Recuperation

Phase V, before writing the TFM, will be the period destined to recover the part of the module failed that can be recovered, as indicated by the teacher in charge.