
Behavior, Contracts, Organitzations and Human Resources
Code: 41982Credits: 15
| Degree programme | Type | Course |
|---|---|---|
| Management, Organization and Business Economics | OB | 0 |
Contact lecturer
- Name :
- Nour Chams
- Email :
- nour.chams@uab.cat
Teaching staff
- Stefan Felix Hemmen Almazor
- Yulia Ponomareva Minchenko
- Elisa del Sordo
- Ryan Federo Acosta
Teaching staff (external to UAB)
- Marco Barrenechea Mendez
- Thomas Woiczyk
- Eduardo Rodes Mayor
Group languages
You can consult this information at the end of the document.
Prerequisites
Students should be familiarized with basic instruments of microeconomics, such as preferences, risk aversion and expected utility, technology and equilibrium analysis. Basic real analysis and algebra are instruments used in the entire module.
Objectives
This module includes several topics related to the economic analysis of the internal organization of the firm. The organization and development of the module will take into account the main learning objective of providing students with relevant economic theory to perform applied research in different fields of management.
The theories are built on economic analysis of transactions and production and focused on the design of contracts, the way that persons organize such transactions. The contract is the result of a negotiation process among the affected parties. Games and behavioral economics provide the instruments for analyzing these processes. The module analyzes repeated and non repeated games under different information situations as well as non-cooperative and cooperative games. We aslo discuss experiments in economics and behavioral economics, stressing the differences in behavior with respect to theory and also gender differences. We make special emphasis on the applications of cooperative games to the contract design. The module also analyzes how external constrains (laws and state regulation) affect the design of such contracts.
The module emphasizes the application of the theories studied in the analyses of the human resources policies of the firms, with emphasis in firm policies regarding recruiting, training, incentives and career concens. Empirical evidence on gender discrimination and wage gaps will be discussed. Other potential applications (industrial organization, corporate finance…) are also discussed.
Furthermore, this module provides a theoretical and empirical overview of the economics of the performance measurement topic, with special focus on the most recent advances and the main areas of research in the field. Based on the fundamentals of the economic theory of production, the lectures introduce and apply alternative approaches to performance and financial performance measurement.
Learning outcomes
- Present research results to various audiences using the different media available.
- Master the technical and IT tools needed to carry out applied studies.
- Identify the relevant sources of information and their content for subsequent analysis.
- Develop an ethical, social and environmental commitment.
- Work in multidisciplinary international teams.
- Develop a critical and a constructive attitude to one's work and that of others.
- Explain and motivate the analyses, interpret the results and present all these clearly and concisely in English.
- Leadership and decision-taking capability.
- Show mastery of theory of organisations, contract theory and game theory.
- Further investigate behavioural economics and information economics.
- Investigate the design and organisational culture of the business.
- Study the limits of the firm and its forms of cooperation.
- Know efficient practices in human resources.
- Recognise the differences between the different theories.
- Identify the implementation of these theories in the real world.
- Further investigate their implementation and design.
- Enumerate and define the different criteria of business efficiency.
- Understand the concept of social equity and its complexity in the business environment.
- Interpret organisational decisions by applying criteria of business efficiency and equity.
- Derive implications for organisational design and culture.
- Discover the factors that limit the firm and its forms of cooperation.
- Design optimal human resource policies.
- Analyse the different practices and strategies in human resources from an economic perspective.
- Identify contributions from gender studies in the subject of research.
Contents
The module presents the main economic theories on the design of contracts.
Three main blocks can be distinguished. Game theory will buid the instruments used in the design of contracts. Special emphasis will be taken on cooperative game theory (Economics of contracts) and applications to the human resoures management (Human resources). Below are some of the main points analyzed during the module.
- Static games of complete information
- Dynamic games of complete information and repeated games.
- Games of incomplete information
- Cooperative games
- Experimental methods
- Behavioral Economics
- Complete contracts under asymmetric information -Moral hazard (agency theory) -Extension.
- Multi-Agent contracting -Adverse Selection and Mechanism design -Moral hazard in team
- Implicit contracts -Theory -Relational contracts -Career concerns
- Incomplete contracts
- Informal contracts
- Contracts and the Law
- Human capital and their observability.
- Learning about innate abilities: A midpoint between human capital and signaling from a dynamic perspective.
- Human capital and firms internal organization.
- Motivation: The agency problem. Incentive contracts.
- Human resource management and performance
- Internal Labour Markets
- Unions and HRM.
A detailed description of their contents can be found: http://www.mmobe.uab.cat/en/
Learning activities and methodology
| Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type: Autonomous | |||
| Reading related cases and practical preparation and problem sets. | 110 | 4.4 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 |
| Type: Guided | |||
| Lectures, discussions and case presentations | 175 | 7 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 |
| Type: Supervised | |||
| Training and monitoring of work in progress and cases | 50 | 2 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 |
The module combines theoretical lectures with practical sessions that encourage active students participation. Learning activities include interactive lectures, problem sets (some of which may require specific software to be solved), reading and critically reviewing scholarly articles, in-class experiments, and simulations. This is an interactive module, where business case preparations and in-class discussions will form the important benchmarks of progress. These discussions give students an opportunity to apply course concepts to real-world problems.
Assessment
Continuous assessment activities
| Title | Weight | Hours | ECTS | Learning outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assignments | 40 | 15 | 0.6 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 |
| Content exams | 50 | 15 | 0.6 | 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18 |
| Paper discussions | 10 | 10 | 0.4 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 |
The module assessment will consist of:
- Assignments (resolution of problems, case studies). Even if cooperation is valuable, all problem set must contain only individual answers to the problems.
- Paper discussions
- Exams
This subject/module can not be evaluated by the means of a single assessment.
A student who does not complete any assessable activity is considered 'non-assessable'. Therefore, once a student participates in any component of the continuous assessment, they can no longer be classified as 'non-assessable'.
Attending the sessions is a requirement.
The module is passed when the final mark is equal or higher than five.
For this course, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted exclusively for support tasks—such as bibliographic or information searches, text correction, idea clarification, brainstorming, and receiving feedback—unless specific instructions are provided by the instructor. Students should not use AI tools to generate complete answers, write full sections of assignments or solve exam questions. Any AI generated content must be clearly identified. Students should specify the AI tools used and include a critical reflection on how these tools influenced both the process and the final result of the activity. Lack of transparency regarding the use of AI in this assessable activity will be considered academic dishonesty and may result in a partial or total penalty on the grade for the activity, or more serious sanctions in severe cases.
The completion of assessment activities is subject to the provisions set out in this course guide and in the "Policy of the School of Economics and Business on the Detection of Irregularities during Assessment Activities", which regulates the conditions under which assessment tasks are conducted and the procedures applicable in cases where indications of irregularities are detected. Students are encouraged to consult the policy.
Bibliography
Addison, J.T., P. Teixeira and T. Zwick (2010): “German works councils and the anatomy of wages”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 63(2), 247-270.
Baker, George, Robert Gibbons, and Kevin J. Murphy. 1994. \"Subjective Performance Measures in Optimal Incentive Contracts.\" Quarterly Journal of Economics 109:1125-56.
Baker, George. 1992. \"Incentive Contracts and Performance Measurement.\" Journal of Political Economy 100:598-614.
Baron, J. & Kreps D. (1999) Strategic Human Resources Frameworks for Managers. New York: Wiley.
Benson, J., and M. Brown (2009): “Employee voice: does union membership matter?”, Human Resource Management Journal, 20 (1), 80-99.
Bidwell, M. (2011): “Paying more to get less: the effects of external hiring versus internal mobility”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(3), 369-407.
Blaug M. 1976. The Empirical Status of Human Capital Theory: A Slightly Jaundiced Survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 14, September, p.827-55.
Bolton, Patrick and M. Dewatripont. 2005. “Contract Theory.” Cambridge: MIT Press.
Brandemburger, A. and Nalebuff, B. 1996. Coopetition. Harvard University Press.
Bull, Clive. 1987. \"The Existence of Self-Enforcing Implicit Contracts.\" Quarterly Journal of Economics 102:147-59.
Camerer, C. 2003. Behavioral Game Theory. Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton. University Press.
Camerer,C. and Malmendier, U. 2007. Behavioral Economics of Organizations. Manuscript.
Collins, C.J. and Smith, K.G. (2006): “Knowledge exchange and combination: the role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms”, Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 544-560.
Demougin, Dominique & Fluet, Claude, 2001. \"Monitoring versus incentives,\" European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1741-1764, October.
Fudenberg, Drew; Tirole, Jean (1991), Game theory, MIT Press, ISBN 978‐0‐262‐06141‐4.
Ghatak, M. Contracts and Organizations, unpublished lecture notes, LSE
Gibbons, R., Roberts, J. (Eds.) (2012), Handbook of organizational economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton,
Gibbons, R.; Waldman M. 2006. Enriching a Theory of Wage and Promotion Dynamics inside Firms. Journal of Labor Economics, v. 24, 1, 59-107.
Gibbons, Robert D. (1992), Game theory for applied economists, Princeton University Press, ISBN978‐0‐691‐00395‐5 . * Published in Europe as Robert Gibbons (2001), A Primer in Game Theory,
Green, Jerry R.; Mas‐Colell, Andreu; Whinston, Michael D. (1995), Microeconomic theory, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978‐0‐19‐507340‐9.
Gutiérrez, O. and V. Salas (2008): “Performance Standards and Optimal Contracts”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45, 139-152.
Haeck, C., and F. Verboven (2011): “The internal economics of a university: evidence from personnel data”, Journal of Labor Economics, 30(3), 591-626.
Hart, Oliver and Bengt Holmstrom. 1987. \"The Theory of Contracts.\" In T. Bewley (ed.), Advances in Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hart, Oliver. 1995. \"Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure\". Oxford University Press. Chapters 1, 2 and 3.
Hemmer, T., O. Kim and R. Verrecchia (2000): “Introducing Convexity into Optimal Compensation Contracts”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28, 307-327.
Holmstrom, B. (1979): “Moral Hazard and Observability”, Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 74-91.
Holmstrom, Bengt, and Paul Milgrom. 1991. \"Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design.\" Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 7:24-52.
Holmstrom, Bengt. 1982. \"Managerial Incentive Problems--A Dynamic Perspective.\" Republished in Review of Economic Studies 66 (1999): 169-82.
Ichniowski, C., Shaw, K. and Prennushi, G. (1997): “The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: a study of steel finishinglines”, American Economic Review, 87(3), 291-313.
Jiang, K., Lepak, D.P., Hu, J. and Baer, J.C. (2012): “How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms”, Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1264-1294.
Laffont, Jean-Jacques and David Martimort. 2002. “The Theory of Incentives: the Principal-Agent Model.” Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lazear E. P. 1995. Personnel Economics. The Wicksell Lectures, Introduction, 1-11.
Lazear E. P. 2000. The Future of Personnel Economics. The Economic Journal, 110, November, F611-639.
Lazear, E. (1998) Personnel Economics for Managers. New York: Wiley.
Lazear, E.; Gibbs M. (2009) Personnel Economics in Practice. Second Edition. New York: Wiley.
Lazear, E.P., and P. Oyer (2004): “Internal and external labour markets: a personnel economics approach”, Labour Economics, 11(5), 527-554.
Lepak, D.P. and Snell, S.A. (1999): “The human resource architecture: toward a theory of human capital allocation and development”, Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 31- 48.
London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, ISBN 978‐0‐7450‐1159‐2 .
Long, R., and J. Shields (2009): “Do unions affect pay methods of Canadian firms? A longitudinal study”, Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 64 (3), 422-465.
Machin, S., and S.Wood (2005): “Human Resource Management as a substitute for trade unions in British workplaces”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 58 (2), 201-218.
McPhail,R., and R. Fisher (2008): “It’s more than wages: analysis of the impact of internal labour markets on the quality of jobs”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(3), 461-472.
Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts (1992): Economics, Organization & Management. Prentice-Hall (Chapter 7). Gutiérrez, O. (2007): “Linear Contracts as Incentives: A Puzzle”, Spanish Economic Review, 9, 153-158.
Mirrlees, J. ([1975], 1999): “The Theory of Moral Hazard and Unobservable Behaviour”, Review of Economic Studies, 66, 3-21. Topic 4: Linear incentives. Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts (1992): Economics, Organization & Management. Prentice-Hall (Chapter 7). Gutiérrez, O. (2007): “Linear Contracts as Incentives: A Puzzle”, Spanish Economic Review, 9, 153-158. Special Session: Solving the problem set.
Morikawa, M. (2010): “Labor unions and productivity: An empirical analysis using Japanese firm-level data”, Labour Economics, 17 (6), 1030-1037.
Mussa, M. and S. Rosen. 1978. “Monopoly and Product Quality.“ Journal of Economic Theory . 301-317. Laffont, Jean-Jacques and David Martimort. 2002. “The Theory of Incentives: the Principal-Agent Model.” Princeton: Princeton University Press. Chapter 2
Myerson, Roger B. (1991), Game theory: analysis of conflict, Harvard University Press, ISBN 978‐0‐674‐34116‐6.
Nishii, L.H., Lepak, D.P. and Schneider, B. (2008): “Employee attributions of the “why” of HR practices: their effects on employee attitudes and behaviors, and custormerM satisfaction”, Personnel Psychology, 61, 503-545.
Osborne, Martin J. (2004), An introduction to game theory, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978‐0‐19‐512895‐6.
Osborne, Martin J.; Rubinstein, Ariel (1994), A course in game theory, MIT Press, ISBN 978‐0‐262‐65040‐3.
Prendergast, C. 1999. The provision of incentives in firms. Journal of Economic Literature, p. 7-63.
Raju, J. and V. Srinivasan (1996): “Quota-based Compensation Plans for Multiterritory Heterogeneous Salesforces”, Management Science, 42, 1454-1462.
Rasmusen, Eric (2006), Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory (4th ed.), Wiley‐Blackwell, ISBN 978‐1‐4051‐3666‐2.
Roth, A. 1995. Introduction to experimental economics. In Kagel, J. and Roth, A., Eds. Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton University Press.
Salanie, Bernard. 1997. “The Economics of Contracts: a Primer.” Cambridge: MIT Press. • Salas, Vicente. “Economía de la Empresa”. Ariel.
Sattinger, M. 1993. Assignment models of the distribution of earnings. Journal of Economic Literature, 31, 2.
Treble, J., E. van Gameren, S. Bridges, and T. Barmby (2001): “The internal economics of the firm: further evidence from personnel data”, Labour Economics, 8(5), 531-552.
Weiss, A. 1995. Human Capital vs. Signalling Explanations of Wages. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 133-154.
Software
The program will provide the software if needed.
Course groups and languages
The information provided is provisional until November 30. After this date, you will be able to consult the language of each group through this link. To access the information, you will need to enter the course CODE
| Type of teaching | Group | Language | Semester | Shift |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (TEm) Theory (master) | 30 | English | annual | morning-mixed |
| (PLABm) Practical laboratories (master) | 30 | English | annual | morning-mixed |