The learning process focuses on the work that the student must do, the mission of the teaching staff is to help him in this task by providing information and showing him the techniques and sources from which to obtain it.

The development of the teaching of the subject and the training of the student is based on the following activities:

1. Tutorials: Through the transmission of the teacher's knowledge, the students reach the conceptual foundations of the subject and the normative and jurisprudential legal framework is consolidated.2. Actividades autónomas: Se trata de actividades donde el estudiante se organiza el tiempo y el esfuerzo de forma autónoma ya sea de forma individual o grupal.

2.1. Study of the subject.

2.2. Preparation of documents of practical activities: which will be delivered and analyzed. These are practical cases proposed sufficiently in advance by the teacher or the preparation of reviews, criticism of books and readings or files on jurisprudence, regulations or films.

23. Search of bibliography, jurisprudence and materials for the resolution of the practical cases, complement the theoretical questions.

2.4. Preparation of course work, reports, etc.

The teaching methodology and the evaluation may undergo some modification depending on the circumstances and especially the restrictions on attendance established by the health authorities.

The completion of work or practical cases (and the possible oral presentation) will have an overall weight of 50%.

Written exam-type tests will have an overall weight of 50%. Among them, there will be a final exam for the whole subject to check the overall acquisition of skills, abilities and knowledge. There may be partial exams.

The coordinating teacher of each group at the beginning of the course will present the schedule of teaching and practical activities, and specify the continuous evaluation system and set the percentage assigned to each of the selected activities, also the revaluation system suspended activities The revaluation can only be carried out if the student has followed the continuous assessment. These instructions will be displayed on the virtual campus /Moodle.

A student who copies or tries to copy in an exam will get a 0 in the exam. A student who submits an assignment in which plagiarism has occurred will receive a 0 and a warning. In case of repetition of the behavior, the student will suspend the subject.

Single evaluación: it will consist of a theoretical exam with a value of 50% of the grade, the resolution of a practical case with a value of 25% of the grade and the presentation and, where applicable, oral defense of a work , with a value of 25% of the grade.

A student will be considered non-assessable when they have not provided the minimum required evidence to apply the established evaluation criteria.

Specifically, a student will be recorded as non-assessable if:

Under the continuous assessment system, they have submitted less than 30% ofthe scheduled assessment activities, or have not participated in any written exams, practical assignments, or individual/group work.

Under the single assessment system, they have not completed any of the required components (theoretical exam, practical case resolution, or written/oral presentation of the final assignment).

This status will be determined by the course coordinator based on the actual participation and submission of the required assessment tasks throughout the course.

For this course, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is restricted. Specifically, AI may be used as a support tool for:

• Bibliographic or general information searches,
• Spell-checking and grammar correction of texts,
• Occasional translations,
• Preliminary organization of ideas in the preparation of assignments and practical cases, always under the student’s critical supervision.

The use of AI to automatically generate complete responses to practical cases, assignments, presentations, or exams is not permitted.

Students must clearly identify which parts of the activity have been generated or assisted by AI, specify the tools used, and include a critical reflection on how these technologies have influenced the process and final outcome.

Failure to transparently disclose the use of AI will be considered a breach of academic integrity, and may result in partial or total penalties for the assessed activity, or more serious sanctions in severe cases.

In particular, the commission of any irregularity in an assessment activity (academic fraud, plagiarism, or improper use of AI, unless such use is expressly authorised in the course guide) that may lead to a significant change in the grade will result in that activity being awarded a grade of 0. Where the course guide establishes that obtaining a minimum grade in that assessment activity is an essential requirement for passing the course, or where several irregularities occur in the assessment activities of the same course, the final grade for that course will be 0. In addition, disciplinary proceedings may be initiated against any student who commits any of these irregularities. Teaching staff reserve the right to conduct oral interviews or an alternative assessment in order to verify the effective acquisition of knowledge and competences and, therefore, the validity of the assessment activities completed by the student.