The subject Clinical Care Practice II is a two-department subject.

The Department of Medicine is responsible for teaching related to:

• 5 seminars (SESP) that take place in the Teaching Unit of Basic Medical Sciences (UDCMB). Each seminar lasts 2 hours and it is held in groups of approximately 20 students.

In the first seminar, within each group of practices, work 5-people-teams will be created. This team will work on a practical case related to the practices in the Primary Care Centers (CAPs). The work teams will remain the different teaching activities linked to SESP and PLAB. A spokesperson of each group will be appointed and will be in charge of making the assignments and maintaining communication with the teachers.

The case will be presented orally in the fifth seminar (see Evaluation Section).

The members of the teaching staff responsible for this part are: Esther Limón Ramírez, Laura Díaz Gete and Marta Pallas Ellacuria.

The Department of Psychiatry and Forensic Medicine is responsible for teaching related to:

• 4 laboratory practice sessions (PLAB) that take place at the UDCMB in groups of approximately 20 students (sessions 1 and 4 last 1 hour and a half and sessions 2 and 3 last 3 hours).

The teacher in charge is Beatriz Molinuevo Alonso.

Students carry out 3 stays (Clinical Care Practice; PCA) in a Primary Care Center lasting 14 hours in total (1-2 students per teacher) linked to the knowledge and skills acquired in the SESP i PLAB.

The first two stays last 5 hours and the last 4 hours.

The members of the teaching staff responsible for this part are: Esther Limón Ramírez, Laura Díaz Gete, Marta Pallas Ellacuria and Beatriz Molinuevo Alonso.

The CAP application will be made from SIGMA @: https://sia.uab.es/Registration and file / Registration for the Final Project / Internship

Contact details for justified requests for changes and incidents are:

• General coordination: Beatriz.Molinuevo@uab.cat
• Coordination of seminars (SESP): Esther.Limon@uab.cat, Laura.Diaz@uab.cat and Marta.Pallas@uab.cat (Dep. Medicina)
• Practical coordination (PLAB): Beatriz.Molinuevo@uab.cat (Dep. Psychiatry and Forensic Medicine)
• CAP incidents: pca.medicina@uab.cat

Changes are only allowed if the causes are justified, as far as possible, with supporting documentation. In case of not being able to attend a seminar (SESP) or practice (PLAB) on the assigned day, it must be requested and justified using the specific form enabled on the Campus Virtual and with an adequate forecast time. It is not necessary to make an exchange with another person.

Requests that arrive through other channels will not be accepted. Requests for changes of day related to evaluation tests of subjects from other courses that are not requested with a minimum of 10 days in advance will not be accepted.

Note: 15 minutes of a class will be reserved, within the calendar established by the center/degree, for students to complete the surveys to evaluate the performance of the teaching staff and to evaluate the subject.

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

REQUIREMENTS TO PASS THE SUBJECT:

1. Minimum attendance at four seminars (SESP) scheduled by the Teaching Unit of Basic Medical Sciences (UDCMB, Bellaterra).
2. Minimum attendance at three laboratory practice sessions (PLAB) scheduled at the UDCMB (Bellaterra).
3. Compliance of the three clinical stays (clinical care practice, CCP) in a Primary Care Center (PCC) with a grade of Pass (Apt).
4. Group submission of three observation protocols (one for each PCC visit), with a passing grade.
5. Participation in group work and its oral presentation/defense.
6. Achievement of a grade of 5 or higher on the exam.

EVALUATION

The continuous assessment of the subject Clinical Care Practice II is based on the following components:

a) Attendance and active participation in seminars and practical sessions:

• Attendance at the five seminars (SESP) may earn a maximum score of 10 points. Failure to attend any of the first four seminars will result in a score of 0 points. Absence from any seminar, even if justified, will reduce the attendance score.
• Attendance at the fifth seminar is mandatory, as it includes the presentation and assessment of group project.
• Attendance at the four laboratory practice sessions (PLAB) may earn a maximum score of 10 points. Attendance at only three of the four sessions will result in a score of 0 points. Absence from any laboratry session, even if justified, will reduce the attendance score.

During each visit to the PCC, each student will complete a specific observation protocol designed to develope the competencies introduced by the teaching staff during the SESP and PLAB sessions. These observations will subsequently be used for small groups (fixed teams of five students established within each internship group).

The representative of each team will submit, through the Virtual Campus, each group observation protocol (three in total) inside the calendar of deliveries foreseen in the beginning of the subject in the second semester. These protocols are the subject of work during the PLAB. Students will have a script and assessment rubrics on the virtual campus. Each group protocol delivered in the established term (corresponding session of practices) will generate a note according to a scale of four categories: A (0.3); B (0.2); C (0.1) and D(0). If a protocol is not suitable, the teacher will require the group to repeat it and indicate the maximum grade that can be obtained in a second review. The members of each work team will have the same qualification. Students can consult the feedback on the work and through the Qualifications tool of the Virtual Campus.

Teachers may require students to explain in the classroom the cases observed and described in the individual protocols.

This part has a weight of 19% in the final mark of the subject that would be distributed as follows:

- Seminars: 5%

- Internships: 5%

- Observation protocols: 9% (each protocol weighs 3%)

b) Examination:

The exam is a multiple-choice question test with five answer options (a single valid answer). A correction will be applied to discount random hits [Corrected Score = (hits- (errors / 4))] which will be transformed into a note that can range from 0 to 10.

The examination date will be the scheduled date according to the official calendar of the Faculty of Medicine.

The subject to be evaluated corresponds to all the theoretical and practical contents of the subject. The students will have study material on the Virtual Campus, which must be completedwith the reference book of the subject (Introduction and chapters from 1 to 7; see section Specific bibliography) and with readings that are indicated in certain sessions.

The exam is considered passed with a grade of 5 or higher.

After each exam, students will have a period of 24 hours to send, through the Virtual Campus, reasoned complaints about the questions, which will be analyzed by teachers. Students can consult their provisional grade through the Qualifications tool of the Virtual Campus. The revision of the evaluation will be carried out individually under the request of tutoring with the coordination of the subject.

Students may appear as long as they have met the first five requirements to pass the subject.

This part has a weight of 50% in the final grade of the subject.

c) Elaboration of group work and oral defense of a clinical case and its community approach.

Students must carry out group work related to the seminars (SESP) held at the UDCMB and the stays at the CAP (PCA).

To carry out this activity, which starts from the first seminar, we will work according to the teams formed in the mentioned session.

Students will have a script and assessment rubric on the Virtual Campus. The members of each work team will have the same qualification.

This part has a weight of 31% in the final grade of the subject.

The work will be submitted to the designated space on the virtual campus and will later be presented as a group on the day of seminar 5.

RECOVERY

Students who have not passed the exam (note 5), or have not taken, will be able to have another exam, if the first five requirements to pass the subject have been met.

Students who meet any of the following conditions may have another exam:

• Not having passed the final exam (minimum grade 5).
• Failure to take the final exam.
• Want to improve grade. In this case, the coordinator of the subject must be notified throgh a form that will be enabled with the call. In this case, the final grade will always be obtained considering the last exam.

The examination date will be the scheduled date according to the official calendar of the Faculty of Medicine.

FINAL NOTE OF THE SUBJECT

Final grade = (Attendance at the five SESPs * 0.05) + (Attendance at the four PLABs * 0.05) + (Observation protocols * 0.03 for each protocol) + (Examination grade*0.50) + (note Group work * 0.31).

This formula will only be applied in the event that the requirements to achieve the subject have been met.

The final grade of students who have not passed the exam after the new test, will be:

1) If the resulting grade after applying the formula to calculate the Final Grade is ≤ 4.7, that grade will be placed.

2) If the resulting grade after applying the formula for calculating the Final Grade is> 4.7, the final grade will be 4.7.

Students who do not meet any of the following requirements will be assigned a rating of \"not assessable\":

1) Minimum attendance at four SESPs

2) Minimum attendance at three PLABs

3) Completion of the three stays (PCA) in a CAP with apt qualification.

4) Group delivery of three observation protocols.

5) Carrying out group work and participating in oral defense.

6) Carrying out the multiple-choice test.

The revision of the evaluation will be carried out individually under the request of tutoring with the coordination of the subject.

Students who do not take both the theoretical and practical assessment tests will be considered ‘Not Assessable,’ losing their rights to enroll in the subject.

The commission of any irregularity in an assessment act (academic fraud, plagiarism or improper use of AI, unless this use is expressly authorized in the teaching guide), which may lead to a significant variation in the grade, means that this act will be graded with a 0. In the event that the teaching guide provides that in order to pass the subject it is an essential requirement to have obtained a minimum grade in this assessment act or that several irregularities occur in the assessment acts of the same subject, the final grade for this subject is 0. Apart from this, a disciplinary process may be initiated against the student who incurs any of these irregularities.

This subject does not provide the single assessment system.

AI, restricted use: “For this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted exclusively in support tasks, such as bibliographic or information searches, text correction or translations. The student

must clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final result of the activity. The lack of transparency in the use of AI in this assessable activity will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may lead to a partial or total penalty in the grade of the activity, or greater sanctions in serious cases.”