To achieve the established objectives, this subject is taught through lecture-type classes and interpretative debates.

• To participate in the interpretative debate, it is essential to have read the texts and completed the corresponding activities prior to each session.
• Students are expected to regularly access Campus virtual.
• Students must inform themselves of the information published on the Virtual Campus/Moodle for this subject.
• All activity deadlines will be confirmed in class at the beginning of the course and must be respected. 

15 minutes of a class will be reserved, within the timetable established by the centre/title, for the complementation by the students of the assessment surveys of the teaching staff's performance and the assessment of the subject\".

CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT

Students must provide evidence of their progress by completing various tasks and tests. These activities are detailed in the table at the end of this section of the Study Guide.

Review. When publishing final marks prior to recording them on students' transcripts, the lecturer will provide written notification of a date and time for reviewing assessment activities. Students must arrange reviews in agreement with the lecturer.

Missed/failed assessment activities. Students may retake assessment activities they have failed or compensate for any they have missed, provided that those they have actually performed account for a minimum of 66.6% (two thirds) of the subject's final mark and that they have a weighted average mark of at least 3.5.

The lecturer will inform students of the procedure involved, in writing, when publishing final marks prior to recording them on transcripts. The lecturer may set one assignment per failed or missed assessment activity or a single assignment to cover a number of such activities. Under no circumstances may an assessment activity worth 100% of the final mark be retaken or compensated for.

Classification as \"not assessable\". In the event of the assessment activities a student has performed accounting for just 25% or less of the subject's final mark, their work will be classified as \"not assessable\" on their transcript.

Misconduct in assessment activities. Students who engage in misconduct (plagiarism, copying, personation, etc.) in an assessment activity will receive a mark of “0” for the activity in question. In the case of misconduct in more than one assessment activity, the student involved will be given a final mark of “0” for the subject. Assessment activities in which irregularities have occurred (e.g. plagiarism, copying, impersonation) are excluded from recovery.

SINGLE ASSESSMENT

The same assessment method as continuous assessment will be used. Attendance and class participation will be replaced by an oral exam. Description:

• Long written exam equivalent to the sum of the two written exams conducted during the course: 50%
• Submission of a literary text analysis and a critical text: 40%
• Oral exam on the studied works and the topics covered in class: 10%

Date of the final evaluation: the same as the date of the last written exam in continuous assessment.

Recovery: last week of June.

Erasmus students who request to take an exam early must present the professor with a written document from their home university justifying their request.

This subject allows the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies exclusively in bibliographic search or information search tasks. The use of translation must be authorized by the teacher. Other situations can be contemplated, always with the teacher's approval. The lack of transparency in the use of AI in this assessable activity will be considered a lack of academic honesty and will result in the activity being evaluated with a 0 and not being able to be recovered, or greater sanctions in serious cases.