The teaching methodology will consist of face-to-face activities, supervised activities, and directed and autonomous work.

During the course, students will work also on content in SPANISH and ENGLISH: knowledge of both languages is required.

The detailed calendar with the content of the different sessions will be displayed on the day of the course presentation and will also be available on the Virtual Campus of the course, where students will be able to find the various teaching materials that the teaching staff deems appropriate and all the information necessary for the proper follow-up of the course. In the event of a change in teaching modality due to force majeure according to the competent authorities, the teaching staff will inform of the changes that will occur in the course programming and teaching methodologies.

15 minutes of a class will be reserved, within the calendar established by the center/degree, for students to complete the surveys evaluating the performance of the teaching staff and evaluating the subject/module.

The content of the course will be sensitive to aspects related to the gender perspective and the use of inclusive language.

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

THE EVALUATION ACTIVITIES ARE:

- Activity A - Exam, 20% of the final grade

- Activity B - Practical Activities, 50% of the final grade

- Activity C - Assignment, 30% of the final grade...

To pass the course, a minimum grade of 5.0 must be obtained for each of activities A, B, and C.

When it is considered that the student has not been able to provide sufficient evidence of assessment, this subject must be classified as non-assessable.

This course does not provide for a single-assessment system.

RE-EVALUATION:

Students will have the right to be re-evaluated for the subject if they have been evaluated from the set of activities, the weight equivalent to a minimum of 2/3 of the total grade for the subject. In order to be able to present the re-evaluation of the subject, it will have had to obtain the average mark of 3.5. The activity that is excluded from the recovery process is coursework (Assignment).

SECOND REGISTRATION:

In the case of second registration, students may take a single synthesis test that will consist of a short content test with a theoretical and practical section, using the bibliography indicated by the teaching staff and a proposal for a research report on a scientific topic.

The qualification of the subject will correspond to the grade obtained on the synthesis test.

PLAGIARISM:

In the event that the student performs any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation of an evaluation act, this evaluation act will be graded with 0, regardless of the disciplinary process that could be instructed. In the event, that several irregularities occur in the evaluation acts of the same subject, the final grade for this subject will be 0.

AI:

For this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted exclusively in support tasks, such as bibliographic or information searches, text correction or translations, and in no case as a replacement for creative activities such as the production of texts, photos, videos and audios. If in doubt, students should consult with the teaching staff. Studentsmust clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used and, in the case of non-trivial uses, include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final result of the activity. The lack of transparency of the use of AI in this assessable activity will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may lead to a partial or total penalty in the grade of the activity, or greater sanctions in serious cases.

IRREGULARITIES:

The commission of any irregularity in an evaluation act (academic fraud, plagiarism or improper use of AI, unless such use is expressly authorised in the syllabus), which may lead to a significant variation in the grade, means that this act will be graded with a 0. In the event that the syllabus provides that to pass the subject it is an essential requirement to have obtained a minimum grade in this evaluation act or that several irregularities occur in the evaluation acts of the same subject, the final grade for this subject is 0. Apart from this, a disciplinary process may be initiated against the student who incurs any of these irregularities.

Any student suspected of presenting tasks that have been generated by AI, prepared by other people or copied; include content generated by AI without referencing, or that does not fall within the permitted assumptions, may be required to produce previous work or other materials that can demonstrate that it is an unpublished work and the result of his original authorship. He may also be asked to explain or justify his work separately. The teaching staff may also use AI use identification systems or carry out the verification tasks that they deem appropriate. If after the review it is detected that irregularities have been committed, the work may be graded with a zero and the student may be subject to further disciplinary measures.