Teaching language:

Degree in tourism: English

Degree in tourism in English:  English 

The course operates on three methodologies of teaching and learning:

a) Theoretical Methodology: face-master class explanations for to the different syllabus items that help the student to develop a practical methodology.

b) Practice methodology: Research case studies to be shared and debated by students, test and learning operation of different technological tools explained in class. This practice methodology can include also the participation in a live project (develop consultant activities for external companies to solve one specific question). 

c) Seminars, conferences and / or company visits held by professionals of tourism.

The evaluation of the subject consists of two different assessment models:

Continuous evaluation. Continuous evaluation consists of the following system:

a) The completion of a test on the last day of class to validate the knowledge acquired through all the practical activities of the subject, which will count for 40% of the final grade and will also include the theoretical content covered in lectures.

b) The completion of various practical activities in the classroom and outside the classroom related to the theoretical content studied in class, which will count for 60% of the final grade (12% for activities in themes 1 and 2, 10% for activities in themes 3 and 5, and 16% for activities in theme 4). Proper formal presentation and careful execution will be assessed.

Final evaluation. The final evaluation will consist of the following assessments:

a) The completion of a dossier withactivities related to the 5 themes of the subject, which will count for 60% of the final grade (12% for activities in themes 1 and 2, 10% for activities in themes 3 and 5, and 16% for activities in theme 4).

b) The completion of an exam, which will count for 40% of the final grade.

\"The re-evaluation of the subject through the final evaluation will follow the same process as for the rest of the students, and to participate in the re-evaluation, it will be necessary to have obtained a minimum grade of 3.5 in the set of evidence thatconstitutes the final evaluation.\"

Re-evaluation. Those students who have not passed the subject in the final evaluation session and have obtained a final grade higher than 3.5 will have the right to take the re-evaluation exam. The maximum grade that the student can achieve in this session is 5.

The grade for the subject will be NOT EVALUABLE when the student attends less than half of the assessment activities and/or does not attend the final exam.

In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for this activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.

This subject allows the use of AI technologies exclusively for support tasks such as bibliographicor content-based searches, text correction or translations. The student must clearly (i) identify which parts have been generated using AI technology; (ii) specify the tools used; and (iii) include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and outcome of the activity. Lack of transparency regarding the use of AI in the assessed activity will be considered academic dishonesty; the corresponding grade may be lowered, or the work may even be awarded a zero. In cases of greater infringement, more serious action may be taken.