In the development of the subject, four types of teaching activities can be distinguished:

• Theoretical classes: exposition of the theoretical contents of each topic of the program. The typical structure of an exhibition class of this type will be as follows: first, an introduction will be made where the objectives of the exhibition and the contents to be discussed will be briefly presented. Next, the contents under study will be broken down, including narrative expositions, formal developments that provide the theoretical foundations, and interspersing examples that illustrate the application of the exposed contents. Finally, the teacher will present the conclusions of the contents. Throughout the course there will be ongoing subject group assessments.
• Classes in the laboratory. The practical part of the theoretical topics will be completed with sessions in the laboratory, where the student will develop a series of programs and applied tasks and must try to solve a specific problem that he will receive at the beginning of the syllabus. Some of these exercises must be delivered to the class onthe specified dates. The practices will be developed in groups of students. The classes include several sessions in the laboratory according to the timetable of the subject, where the student will carry out the development of the exercises.

This approach to work is aimed at promoting active learning and developing the skills of organization and planning, oral and written communication, teamwork and critical reasoning. The quality of the exercises carried out, their presentation and their operation will be especially valued.

The management of the teaching of the subject will be done through the Virtual Campus (https://cv.uab.cat/), which will serve to see the materials, manage the practice groups, make the corresponding deliveries, see the notes , communicate with teachers, etc.

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

The aim of the evaluation process is to verify that the student has achieved the knowledge and skills defined in the objectives of the subject, as well as the competencies.

Several types of activities will be evaluated independently where the weighted sum of them will give the final grade. These activities are:

1. Theory (T)
2. Resolution of laboratory practices (PL)
3. Completion of individual practical exercises (PA).

The Theory (T) part will be assessed with two individual partial tests throughout the course. The final grade of Theory will come from the weighted sum of the two controls (0.5 * Control 1 + 0.5 * Control 2). There will be a second chance to retake that part on the day we are assigned to the week of resit exams. Parts that have not been passed in the partial theory tests may be recovered. The minimum grade to pass this part is> = 4.5.

The Laboratory Practice Resolution (PL) part will be evaluated in groups and individually. The work developed in situ during the internship sessions will be evaluated. It will have several installments, oral questions and personal interviews. The final grade will be based on the weighted sum of the evidence collected. To pass the PL the minimum grade must be >=4.5. There is only one chance (this part cannot be recovered).

The individual practical exercises (PA) will consist of working on very specific exercises and questions, some of them related to those found in laboratory practices. Given their nature and purpose, they are not recoverable.

The final grade of the course will be the weighted sum of the grades of each of the four activities. The result must be> = 5.

In case of not passing the subject, not reaching the minimum score in any of the sections (Theory or Laboratory Practices), although when doing the weighted average the final grade was equal to or higher than 5 the grade that will be put in the file will be 4.5.

In the event that the average does not reach 5, the grade that will appear in the file will be the numerical grade obtained numerically.

If the student delivers any activity, it is understood that it is presented in the subject and will be evaluated. If it does not deliver any activity, then it can be considered Not evaluable.

Granting an honorary enrollment grade is the decision of the faculty responsible for the subject. UAB regulations state that MHs can only be awarded to students who have obtained a final grade equal to or higher than 9.00. Up to 5% MHs of the total number of students enrolled can be awarded.

The dates of continuous evaluation and delivery of works will be published on the virtual campus and may be subject to possible scheduling changes for reasons of adaptation to possible incidents; these changes will always be reported to the virtual campus as it is understood that the CV is the usual mechanism for the exchange of information between teachers and students.

For each assessment activity, a place, date and time of review will be indicated in which the student will be able to review the activity with the teacher. In this context, claims may be made on the grade of the activity, which will be evaluated by the teacher responsible for the subject. If the student does not appear for this review, this activity will not be reviewed later.

In this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is allowed as an integral part of the development of the work, provided that the final result reflects a significant contribution of the student in personal analysis and reflection. The student should clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used, and include critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final outcome of the activity. The non-transparency of the use of AI will be considered academic dishonesty and may lead to a penalty in the grade of the activity, or greater sanctions in cases of severity.

This subject does not provide for the single assessment system.

Repeating students: Repeating students who have passed the laboratory practices can request the validation of this part of the subject. The rest of the assessment activities must be done in the same conditions as the other students.

Note on plagiarism:

Without prejudice to other disciplinary measures deemed appropriate, and in accordance with current academic regulations, irregularities committed by a student that may lead to a variation in the grade in an assessable activity will be graded with a zero ( 0). Assessment activities qualified in this way and by this procedure will not be recoverable. If it is necessary to pass any of these assessment activities to pass the course, this course will be suspended directly, without the opportunity to retake it in the same course. These irregularities include, but are not limited to:

the total or partial copy of a practice, report, or any other assessment activity;

let copy;

present group work not done entirely by group members (applied to all members, not just those who have not worked);

present as own materials prepared by a third party, evenif they are translations or adaptations, and in general works with non-original and exclusive elements of the student;

have communication devices (such as mobile phones, smart watches, camera pens, etc.) accessible during individual theoretical-practical assessment tests (exams);

talk to classmates during individual theoretical-practical assessment tests (exams);

copy or attempt to copy from other students during the theoretical-practical assessment tests (exams

Attendance at laboratory classes is compulsory.