Continuous Evaluation

1.- Theoretical exercises (5 points out of 10)

These exercises consist of tests to assess the theoretical knowledge acquired. Specifically:

1.1 Six self-evaluation exercises (2 points).

For each of the six subjects of the course, a self-assessment exercise will be held consisting of answering a questionnaire of several questions. The exercise will be carried out remotely, for which, in each subject, there will be a maximum time for its delivery. In order to solve it, the student will be able to have and consult the documentation he/she considers appropriate, but it must be taken into account that each questionnaire has a time limit for its resolution and only one attempt.

The self-evaluation exercises have a score of 2 points out of a total of 10, so that each one of them is worth 0.33 points, all of them equally.

1.2 Final exam (3 points)

A final classroom exercise will be carried out in the classroom to be determined in the Bellaterra Campus, consisting of answering a questionnaire of 60 multiple-choice questions.

It is not allowed the use of any documentation for the resolution of this exercise and to perform the same must have a laptop in the classroom, as it will be done through the virtual classroom of the University.

This exercise scores a maximum of 3 points out of 10, and in order to pass the continuous evaluation and, therefore, to add up all the exercises of this one, it is necessary to obtain at least 40% in this exercise, that is to say, at least 1.2 points out of 3.

2.- Practical exercises (5 points out of 10)

These exercises consist of the delivery of a set of four continuous evaluation tests (PEC) that allow the evaluation of the practical knowledge.

They are practical cases of operative character in which a situation is exposed as a case, on the basis of which certain information searches must be carried out, consultation of videos, resolution of cases and The resolution of each PEC will be carried out in the term that each one is indicated by what will have a maximum period of delivery. Its structure and content will have to be adapted to the format indicated.

The structure, presentation, content, synthesis, reasoning and content will be valued. This exercise will score a maximum of 5 points out of 10, according to the following distribution: PEC1: 0.5 points; PEC2: 1.0 points; PEC3: 1.5 points; PEC4: 2 points.

3.- Final grade of the continuous evaluation

The final grade of the continuous evaluation will be obtained from the arithmetic sum of each one of the exercises carried out and to consider it passed it will be necessary to obtain at least a five in total.

Single Evaluation

Students who opt for the single evaluation will take a final synthesis test of all the content of the course (50%) and will hand in and/or be evaluated on the practical work of the course (50%).

The date for this test and the delivery of the work of the subject will be the same scheduled in the timetable for the last exam of continuous evaluation.

The same recovery system will be applied as for the continuous evaluation.

Recovery Exam

Access to the exam

In the case of not having passed the continuous evaluation, it will be possible to access the recovery exam as long as the student has participated (presented) at least in two thirds of the continuous evaluation.

Objective

This exercise aims to evaluate the whole of the contents of the subject, so it must be carried out in its entirety, without retaining part of the exercises of the continuous evaluation.

Venue

It will take place in the classroom to be determined at the Bellaterra Campus.

Composition

The exercise will consist of a questionnaire of 30 multiple-choice theoretical questions and the resolution of two practical cases.

Complementary documentation

It is not allowed the use of any documentation for the resolution of this exercise and to perform the same must have a laptop computer in the classroom, as it will be done through the virtual classroom of the University.

Qualification

The questionnaire has a value of 50% and the resolution of the practical cases of another 50% of the total.

In order to pass the recovery exam, at least a total of five will have to be reached, which will be obtained from the arithmetic sum of each of the two parts that compose the exercise.

In the case of passing the recovery exam, the grade obtained will be a maximum of 5, regardless of the grade obtained in the exercise.

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

Oral resolution

If deemed appropriate, some of the tests may be taken orally.

Multiple-choice questionnaire

Characteristics of the exercises in multiple-choice questionnaire format, both of the continuous evaluation and of other tests, for each question four answers will be proposed, of which there is always one correct answer and only one correct answer. Wrong answers will deduct 33%.

Changing the date of a test or exam

Students who need to change an evaluation date must submit the request by filling out the document found in the EPSI Tutoring Moodle space.

Once the document has been filled in, it must be sent to the professor of the subject and to the Grade Coordination.

Revision

On carrying out each evaluation activity, lecturers will inform students (on Moodle) of the procedures to be followed for reviewing all grades awarded, and the date on which such a review will take place.

Other considerations - Plagiarism

Without prejudice to other disciplinary measures that may be deemed appropriate, and in accordance with current academic regulations, \"in the event that any irregularity is detected that may lead to a significant variation in the grade of an evaluation act, this evaluation act will be graded with a 0 (zero), regardless of the disciplinary process that may be instigated. In case of several irregularities in the evaluation acts of the same subject, the final grade of this subject will be 0 (zero)\".

If during the correction there are indications that an activity or work has been done with answers assisted by artificial intelligence, the teacher may supplement the activity with a personal interview to corroborate the authorship of the text.

If there are unforeseen circumstances that prevent the normal development of the course, the teacher may modify both the methodology and the evaluation of the course.

Due to unforeseen circumstances that prevent the normal development of the subject, the teaching staff may modify both the methodology and the evaluation system of the subject.

Use of IA

This subject allows the use of AI technologies as an integral part of the submitted work, provided that the final result reflects a significant contribution from the student in terms of analysis and personal reflection.The student must clearly (i) identify which parts have been generated using AI technology; (ii) specify the tools used; and (iii) include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and final outcome of the activity.

Lack of transparency regarding the use of AI in the assessed activity will be considered academic dishonesty; the corresponding grade may be lowered, or the work may even be awarded a zero.

In cases of greater infringement, more serious action may be taken.

Students will obtain a not assessed/not submitted course grade unless they have submitted more than 30 % of the assessment items.