
Sectorial Risk Models
Code: 104008Credits: 6
| Degree programme | Type | Course |
|---|---|---|
| Prevention and Integral Safety and Security | OB | 2 |
Contact lecturer
- Name :
- Jordi Rodriguez Lumbiarres
- Email :
- jordi.rodriguez.lumbiarres@uab.cat
Group languages
You can consult this information at the end of the document.
Prerequisites
This subject does not have any prerequierments
Objectives
Learning outcomes
- Coordinate the resources of the three main subsystems of the prevention and integral security sector: people, technology and infrastructures.
- Use the capacity for analysis and synthesis to solve problems.
- Respond to problems applying knowledge to practice.
- Work in institutional and interprofessional networks.
- Students must have and understand knowledge of an area of study built on the basis of general secondary education, and while it relies on some advanced textbooks it also includes some aspects coming from the forefront of its field of study.
- Students must be capable of applying their knowledge to their work or vocation in a professional way and they should have building arguments and problem resolution skills within their area of study.
- Students must be capable of collecting and interpreting relevant data (usually within their area of study) in order to make statements that reflect social, scientific or ethical relevant issues.
- Students must be capable of communicating information, ideas, problems and solutions to both specialised and non-specialised audiences.
- Students must develop the necessary learning skills to undertake further training with a high degree of autonomy.
- Critically analyse the principles, values and procedures that govern professional practice.
- Analyse the sex- or gender-based inequalities and the gender biases present in one's own area of knowledge.
- Identify, develop or acquire and maintain the main resources necessary to respond to tactical and operational needs inherent in the prevention and security sector.
- Analyse the preventative interventions in matters of security, environment, quality and social corporate responsibility and identify the inherent risk factors.
- Take a preventative view in the area of security.
- Work and learn autonomously.
- Know how to communicate and transmit ideas and result efficiently in a professional and non-expert environment, both orally and in writing.
- Make efficient use of ITC in the communication and transmission of results.
Contents
Learning activities and methodology
| Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classes with TIC support and Evaluation | 16 | 0.64 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 |
| Resolution of practical cases. Realization of works. Personal study | 110 | 4.4 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 |
| Tutorials to support practical and theoretical work (Webex sessions and forums). Resolution of doubts. Follow-up of the exercises; Attention in the Moodle Classroom | 24 | 0.96 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 |
Assessment
Continuous assessment activities
| Title | Weight | Hours | ECTS | Learning outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Specific work, preferably in a group, that develops a specific aspect of the contents of the units. | 20% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 |
| Presential written test of Continuous Evaluation | 50% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 |
| Theoretical Continuous Evaluation Tests-individual practices | 30% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 |
Continuous Assessment
Students will take three continuous evaluation tests (PEC) that will be submitted through the Moodle classroom.
Students will take a final evaluation by means of a written test on the subject matter on the date marked in the calendar of the second semester.
In order to pass the course through continuous evaluation, the average of the PEC and the Continuous Evaluation Written Test must be 5 points.
A score of 5 must be obtained on the exam for it to count towards the continuous assessment.
In case of not delivering any of the PEC, or not participating in the forums, the continuous evaluation will be considered as not evaluable.
Single evaluation
The students who opt for the single evaluation will take a final synthesis test of all the content of the course (50%) and will deliver and/or be evaluated of the PECs of the course (50%).
The date for this test and the delivery of the work of the subject will be the same scheduled in the timetable for the last exam of continuous evaluation.
The same recovery system will be applied as for the continuous evaluation.
Evaluation of the students in second or more summons
Students repeating the course must take the scheduled tests and exams and hand in the course work on the dates indicated in the Moodle classroom.
Recovery Exam
In case of not passing the course according to the above mentioned criteria (continuous assessment), a recovery test may be taken on the date scheduled in the timetable, which will deal with all the contents of the program.
In order to participate in the recovery the student must have been previously evaluated in a set of activities, the weight of which is equivalent to a minimum of two thirds of the total grade of the subject. However, the grade that will be recorded in the student's file is a maximumof 5-Approved.
Changing the date of a test or exam
Students who need to change an evaluation date must submit the request by filling out the document that can be found in the EPSI Tutoring Moodle space.
Once the document has been filled in, it must be sent to the subject teacher and to the Grade Coordination.
Revision
At the time of each evaluation activity, the faculty will inform the students of the grade review mechanisms.
For single evaluation students, the review process will be the same.
Consult the EPSI Evaluation Regulations.
Other considerations - Plagiarism
Without prejudice to other disciplinary measures deemed appropriate, and in accordance with current academic regulations, \"in the event that the student performs any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade of an act of evaluation, this act of evaluation will be graded with a 0, regardless of the disciplinary process that may be instigated. in the event that several irregularities occur in the acts of evaluation of the same subject, the final grade of this subject will be 0 \".
If during the correction there are indications that an activity or work has been done with answers assisted by artificial intelligence, the teacher may supplement the activity with a personal interview to corroborate the authorship of the text.
If there are unforeseen circumstances that prevent the normal development of the course, the teacher may modify both the methodology and the evaluation of the course.
Use of IA
For this course, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted exclusively for support tasks, such as bibliographic or information searches, text correction, or translations. The student must clearly identify which parts have been generated using this technology, specify the tools used, and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final outcome of the activity. Lack of transparency regarding the use of AI in this assessed activity will be considered a breach of academic integrity and may result in partial or total penalties in the grading of the activity, or more serious sanctions in more severe cases
Bibliography
ALONSO GARCÍA, Ángel. (1988) Conceptos de organización industrial. 1ª Edición. Marcombo. Barcelona
CALATAYUD SARTHOU, A. et al. Evaluación y control de los riesgos laborales. (2006) Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia
CARRILLO DONAIRE, Juan A. (2000) Derecho de la Calidad y de la Seguridad Industrial. Marcial Pons
CORTÉS, J. M. (2000) Técnicas de prevención de riesgos laborales. Ed. Tébar Flores, Madrid
COBO SÁNCHEZ, D. (2004) Introducción a la prevención de riesgos laborales. ISTAS, Madrid.
DURÁN, F. (2001). Informe sobre riesgos laborales y su prevención. La seguridad y salud en el trabajo en España. Estudio para la elaboración de un informe sobre riesgos laborales y su prevención. Presidencia de Gobierno, Madrid
FERNANDEZ MARCOS, L. (2000) El ámbito natural de la evaluación de riesgos en la normativa preventiva. Aranzadi Social, pág. 631-646
GARCÍA NINET,J.L. (Dir.). (2005) Manual de prevención de riesgos laborales (Seguridad, Higiene y salud en el trabajo), Atelier, Barcelona
MELIÁ NAVARRO, José Luis.(2007) El factor humano en la seguridad laboral. Lettera, Bilbao
MÉTAYER, Y; HIRSCH, L. (2007). Primeros pasos en la gestión de riesgos. AENOR, Madrid
MOLES PLAZA, Ramón Jordi. Derecho y calidad. El régimen jurídico de la normalización técnica. (2001) Ariel Derecho
MUÑOZ RUIZ; Ana Belén. (2009) El sistema normativo de prevención de riesgos laborales, Lex Nova, Valladolid
OIT. Proyecto de directrices técnicas de la OIT sobre sistemas de gestión de la seguridad y salud en el trabajo, Ginebra, 2001
OIT. Trabajo sin riesgo y cultura de la seguridad. Informe de la OIT presentado con ocasión del Día Mundial sobre la Seguridad y la Salud en el Trabajo 2004
OIT. La prevención: una estrategia global. Informe de la OIT para el Día mundial sobre la seguridad y la salud en el trabajo 2005. Ginebra, 2005
RUBIO ROMERO, J.C. (2004) Métodos de evaluación de riesgos laborales. Diaz de Santos, Madrid, 2004
SALA FRANCO, Tomás. Derecho de la prevención de riesgos laborales. 3ªEd. Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia, 2007
TARRÉS VIVES, Marc. Normas técnicas y ordenamiento jurídico. Valencia, Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia, 2003
Software
This subject will use the basic software of the Office 365 package
Course groups and languages
The information provided is provisional until November 30. After this date, you will be able to consult the language of each group through this link. To access the information, you will need to enter the course CODE
| Type of teaching | Group | Language | Semester | Shift |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (TE) Theory | 1 | Spanish | second semester | afternoon |