Format Course:

Lessons: Theoretical topics.

• Self-preparation
• Self-control
• Consultations / Debates

Techniques: Skills development.

Introduction

Review of concepts

Simulation

Roles

Practices:

Presentation of management tools and project planning.

Presentations in class.

Team work and exercises to work autonomously and to solve and discuss in the laboratory sessions.

Purpose of the activities:

• Theory: Complete overview.
• Techniques: Practice the main necessary techniques and improve skills.
• Practices:
• Master management tools and project planning.
• Know and practice the main aspects of the management of a project.
• Facilitate the tasks that students should perform when they develop their Final Degree Project.

Use of AI:

In this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted as an integral part of the development of the work, provided that the final result reflects a significant contribution of the student in the analysis and personal reflection. The student must clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final result of the activity. The lack of transparency in the use of AI will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may lead to a penalty in the grade of the activity, or greater sanctions in serious cases.

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

Calculation of the final grade:

- Theory (minimum 5 out of 10), which corresponds to 50% of the final base note.

The theory grade will be the weighted average of the parts assessed.

Exams of evaluation of the theoretical knowledge and techniques of the subject (75%):

• 50% - 1th EXAM (October): Project Feasibility Study - Individual.
• 50% - 2nd EXAM (January, date provided by the school): Implementation and Monitoring of the Project - Individual.
• In case of failing one of the parts with less than 4, or wanting to improve the grade: 100% Exam Repeat (date provided by the school). It will be necessary to perform an examination of both parts, regardless of whether you have failed one or both exams. - Individual.
• MINIMUM GRADE FROM PARTIALS TO MAKE AVERAGE: 4

Techniques exercises (10%): Exercises proposed in class, which must be delivered on the day indicated by the teacher. The exercises are not compulsory, but they are highly recommended and necessary to qualify for honors. Cannot be repeated. - Individual.

Cooperative exercises (15%): Exercises in class, which must be delivered on the day indicated by the teacher. The exercises are not compulsory, but they are highly recommended and necessary to qualify for honors. Cannot be repeated. - In a group.

Attendance at extraordinary activities: 0,2 points to add to the final grade of theory for attendance ateach of the conferences or activities proposed. - Individual.

- Practices (minimum 5 out of 10), which corresponds to 50% of the final base note. - In a group.

• Attendance at all practice sessions is mandatory.
• Closed laboratory practices that require preparation and previous work by students.
• The final note of practices will be the weighted average of the different practices. It is necessary to submit them all in order to pass the subject.
• The practices cannot be repeated.
• If the practices have been approved on a previous course, it will not be necessary to repeat them.

The dates of continuous evaluation and delivery of work will be published on the virtual campus and may be subject to programming changes for reasons of adaptation to possible incidents.

Always be informed, on the virtual campus, about these possible changes, since this is the platform for the exchange of information between teachers and students, and it is where the assessable content of the subject will be published.

For each assessment activity, a place, date and time of revision in which the student can review the activity with the teacher will be indicated. In this context, claims can be made on the activity grade, which will be assessed by the professor responsible for the subject.

If the student does not show up for this revision, this activity will not be reviewed later.

With honors: The honor grade can be obtained with a mark average superior or equal to 9.0. and having completed and passed all the exercises in the theory classes. Due to the fact that there is a limited number of honor grades that can be given by group, they will be awarded in order of note from major to minor. Students who have to retake any exams are not eligible for a distinction. In case of a tie between several students, additional work can be requested.

Single evaluation: This subject does NOT provide for the single evaluation system.

Without prejudice to other disciplinary measures deemed appropriate, and in accordance with current academic regulations, irregularities committed by a student that may lead to a variation of the qualification will be qualified with a zero (0), and the work is considered as not handed in and will not be counted when evaluating the practical grade. The evaluation activities qualified in this way and by this procedure cannot be repeated. If it is necessary to pass any of these assessment activities to pass the subject, this subject will be failed directly, with no opportunity to repeat it in the same course.

These irregularities include, among others:

• The total or partial copy of a practice, report, or any other evaluation activity.
• Let anyone else copy.
• Present a group work not done entirely by the members of the group.
• Present as own, materials made by a third party, even if they are translations or adaptations, and in general works with non-original and exclusive elements of the student.
• Have communication devices (such as mobile phones, smart watches, etc.) accessible during the theoretical assessment tests-individual practices (exams).

In case of failing the subject because any of the assessment activities does not reach the minimum grade required, the numerical score of the file will be the lowest value between 4.5 and the weighted average of the grades. With the exceptions that the qualification of \"not evaluable\" will be granted to students who do not participate in any of the assessment activities, and that the numerical score of the record will be the lower value between 3.0 and the weighted average of the grades if the student has committed irregularities in an act of evaluation (and therefore the pass for compensation will not be possible).