The teaching of the subject and the training of the students will be done during the course based on the following activities:

1. Targeted activities:

1.1. Theoretical classes: students will achieve reach the theoretical framework of the subject and their contextualization. These activities require less interactivity and are conceived primarily as a one-way method of transmitting knowledge from the professor to the students.

 1.2. Practical classes: students analyze, together with the professor, documents, legislation and other materials to critically understand what is explained in the theoretical classes.

2. Supervised activities: Activities developed by students with the supervision and support of professors.

3. Autonomous activities: Elaboration of cases that will be exposed and discussed in the classroom; search of bibliography and material complementary to the one facilitated by the professor; Comprehensive reading of texts and critical analysis of audiovisual materials.

In the event that a student copies, commits plagiarism, or is found in possession of a prohibited device during an assessment, the teaching staff shall award a mark of 0 for that specific assessment activity and shall report the incident to the Faculty Dean’s Office, submitting a report detailing the circumstances and evidence of the occurrence, with a view to requesting the initiation of potential disciplinary proceedings against the student. This assessment activity shall not be eligible for reassessment. In the event that more than one irregularity occurs within the assessment activities of the same module, the final mark for that module shall be 0.

Evaluation (for attending students)

The final grade will be obtained from the following elements:

1.1 Continuous evaluation of the classes. (50% of the note)

Attendance at seminars, based on just cause assumptions, will be mandatory for students.

Teamwork 25%.

Practical case 25%.

1.2 Final exam. (50% of the note)

The final exam must be passed with a mark higher than 5 to average with the rest of the qualifications of the continuous evaluation.

Students will be assessable as long as they have completed a set of activities whose weight is equivalent to a minimum of 2/3 of the total grade for the subject. If the value of the activities carried out does not reach this threshold, the subject teacher may consider the student as \"non-evaluable\". The minimum attendance requirement for the subject in order to be eligible for assessment is 80% of the sessions.

Single Assessment

First Part (25%). Multiple choice.

Second Part (25%). Essay question.

Common activity, same as the final exam (50% of the note).

The same non-evaluable criterion will be applied as for the continuous evaluation.

Re-evaluation

There will be a re-evaluation just of the part related to the final exam. For single assessment students, the same re-evaluation system will be applied as for continuous assessment.

Themaximum grade in the re-evaluation cannot be higher than 6.

Use of AI

Restricted use: In this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted exclusively for bibliographic or information searches and for the correction of texts in classroom activities. Students must clearly identify which parts have been generated using this technology, specify the tools employed, and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced both the process and the final outcome of the activity. Failure to disclose the use of AI in this assessed activity shall be considered a breach of academic integrity and may result in a partial or total penalty in the mark for the activity, or in more severe penalties in cases of greater seriousness.