The learning process is based on the work of the person enrolled in it, who learns by working, with the mission of the teaching staff to help them by providing information, showing them sources of knowledge and supervising the work.

The development of the teaching of the subject and the training of the student is based on the following activities:

1. Directed activities:

1.1 Lectures: The theory teacher will explain the fundamental concepts of each topic to deepen and work in the seminars in a practical way. The student achieves the conceptual bases of the subject and learns the legal and regulatory framework. The theoretical class does not necessarily have to involve a passive position of the students since it can be built by both parties or theoretical knowledge can be produced by the students by applying technology. Theoretical content can be worked on from questions that students ask in the classroom or that the teaching staff formulates, from a news item that has appeared in the press, etc...

1.2. Seminars: Attendance at seminars is mandatory. At the beginning of the course, the teaching staff will propose the activities they consider relevant for the purposes of continuous assessment by publishing a calendar with the schedule of activities in the Moodle classroom. These are activities that students will carry out in the classroom, with the supervision and support of the teaching staff.

2. Autonomous activities: They are fundamentally those related to the study of the subject to assume basic knowledge of it. In addition to the study, they include, among others:

2.1. The preparation of documents: these are those required by the seminars. They can be in relation to practical cases proposed in advance or that must be created by the students. Part of the autonomous activity is a partial exam, the specific form of which is determined by the teaching staff of each group.

2.2. Search for bibliography and instrumental jurisprudence for the resolution of the seminars and the preparation of the exam.

2.3. Comprehensive reading of legal texts: The texts can be judgments, journal articles, monographs. The type of text will be determined by the teachers of each group.

Part of the material for the activities is made available to students through the Virtual Campus.

Note: 15 minutes of a class will be reserved, within the calendar established by the center/degree, for students to complete the surveys to evaluate the performance of the teachers and to evaluate the subject.

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

COMPETENCE ACQUISITION ASSESSMENT. QUALIFICATION SYSTEM

ORDINARY ASSESSMENT AND QUALIFICATION SYSTEM:

I. Continuous assessment:

The continuous assessment is made up of three main parts:

The first part is the carrying out of practical activities that will be carried out in the classroom with prior preparation by the students. Active participation in class will be assessed. This part has a value of 20%.

The second part is the carrying out of a non-exempt partial examination of the subject. The teaching staff will determine the form and type of the examination. The value of this part is 15%.

The third part will consist of oral presentation in class by groups of legal topics previously assigned by the teaching staff to the students. The value of this part is 15%.

The remaining 50% to obtain the approved subject will be made up of the final exam. The type of final exam will be specified by the teacher in class.

Not assessable:

The student will be assessable provided that they have completed a set of activities whose weight is equivalent to 2/3 of the total grade for the subject. If the value of the activities does not reach this threshold, the teacher of the subject may consider the student as not assessable.

The teacher responsible for each group may stipulate a percentage of the grade linked to mandatory and active attendance in the classroom with an assessable activity,

• or, alternatively, link the permanence in the continuous assessment system to a minimum of class attendance.

• or, in a negative sense, that the student may miss a maximum of X sessions to be assessed by continuous assessment.

In accordance with the provisions of the “Guidelines and criteria for teaching”, approved by the Board of the Faculty of Law, it is hereby informed that, in accordance with the provisions of points 15 and 22, students who for any justified reason cannot take the partial or final exam of the subject will be called to an oral exam to take either of the two tests. This measure has been agreed upon by the teaching staff responsible for all the groups of the Civil Law II subject.

The partial or final exam will be held before a panel of three teachers and a report of the test will be drawn up.

“22. The dates of continuous assessment tests may not be modified, unless there is an exceptional and duly justified reason. If a student is unable to attend a test due to force majeure and duly justified circumstances, the responsible teaching staff will determine the postponement and agree on an alternative date, within the corresponding school period. This new test may be written or oral, at the discretion of the teacher. The dates of the final tests set by Academic Management may not be modified.”

"15. Regarding the conduct of oral tests, teaching staff must record them, with the written consent of the student, in order to guarantee their review and/or any academic incident that may arise during their conduct. Recording will not be necessary when the oral test is conducted with a panel. The panel must consist of a minimum of three teachers and must draw up a report of each exam."

II. Final exam

Students will be able to take the final exam regardless of the grade obtained in the continuous assessment.

The subject will only be passed if a grade of 4 out of 10 or higher is obtained in the final exam.

The specific type of exam will be determined by the teaching team of each subject group. Students are examined on the entire subject program, even if for academic or extra-academic reasons it has not been possible to give all the content in the master classes.

Students are examined on the entire subject program, even if for academic or extra-academic reasons it has not been possible to give all the content.

III. Single assessment:

Content of the single assessment

The single assessment must have the same level of complexity of requirement as the continuous assessment and in it the student must demonstrate the acquisition of the knowledge and skills specific to each subject, in accordance with what is established in the teaching guide, which will specify the content of the single assessment test.

In any case, the single assessment, like the continuous assessment, must include a minimum of three assessable activities, of two different types, none of which can represent more than 50% of the final grade.

In the event that it is required to present evidence that the student has carried out independently during the academic year, on the date of the single assessment it must be verified that the student has acquired the expected knowledge and skills through its completion.

The single assessment will consist of the following tests, which must be taken individually and personalized by each student, on the official date scheduled for the final exam:

a) solving a cross-curricular practical case, where students must answer the questions posed to them about the case. (40%)

b) taking a multiple-choice test, where incorrect questions and those left blank will be penalized. (20%)

c) taking a written test of theoretical content, where students must demonstrate their knowledge of the subject program. (40%)

IV. Subject grading with the continuous assessment system

The score obtained in the continuous assessment will have a value of 50% of the subject grade. The final exam score will have a value of 50% of the subject grade.

Continuous assessment grade: will consist of the grades obtained in the practical activities proposed in the seminars, as well as the reverse teaching activities and the partial exams taken during the course.

Final exam grade: to be able to pass the subject, the final written exam must be passed with a minimum grade of 4 out of 10.

The subject will be passed with a minimum of 5 out of 10, in accordance with the established percentages.

Not assessable: the same criteria as the continuous assessment will be applied.

V. RE-ASSESSMENT

To access the re-assessment, a minimum grade of 3 out of 10 must be obtained for the subject, whether the student has opted for the single assessment or the continuous assessment. Students are examined for the entire program of the subject.

To be able to access the re-assessment, it is necessary to have taken the final exam.

The final grade will be the maximum of 5 points. The final grade will be that obtained in the re-evaluation exam.

In the re-evaluation exam, the student is examined for 100% of the subject without taking into account the grade of the continuous assessment.

Students who have opted for the single assessment will have the same type of exam as in the final exam: it must include a minimum of three assessable activities, of two different types, none of which can represent more than 50% of the final grade.

VI. USE OF AI

Restricted use: For this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is allowed exclusively in support tasks, such as bibliographic or information searches, text correction or translations, etc. The student must clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final result of the activity. The lack of transparency in the use of AI in this assessable activity will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may lead to a partial or total penalty in the grade of the activity, or greater sanctions in serious cases.

VII. FRAUDULENT CONDUCT IN EVALUATION TESTS

In the event that the student copies, commits plagiarism or is discovered with any prohibited device in any assessment test, the teaching staff will grade him/her with a 0 in this assessment act, and will notify the Dean of the Faculty of the fact by submitting a report on the circumstances and evidence of the fact produced to request the opening of a possible disciplinary file against the student. This assessment activity will not be recoverable. In the event that more than one irregularity occurs in the assessment acts of the same subject, the final grade for this subject is 0.