The learning process focuses on the work of the student, who learns working individually and in groups, the mission of the teaching staff being to help them in this task by providing information and showing them the techniques and sources where it can be obtained.

The development of teaching of the subject and student training is based on the following activities:

1. Directed activities:

1.1. Lectures classes/ theoretical classes: where students achieve through the transmission of knowledge of the teacher the conceptual bases of the subject and assume the legal, regulatory and jurisprudential framework.

1.2. Seminar / practical classes: as a learning space where students assume a preferably active role, together with the teacher, to analyze and interpret previously elaborated questions, issues or cases in order to develop and consolidate the essential content explained in the theoretical classes.

2. Supervised activities: These are activities that students will develop in the classroom, with the supervision and support of the teacher. It is the solution of some practical assumption in the classroom, the elaboration of some records of sentences and / or regulations, or the realization of outlines or written drafting of some epigraphs of the subject or of complementary readings of monographs or doctrinal articles.

3. Autonomous activities: these are activities in which the student organizes time and effort autonomously, either individually or in groups.

3.1 Study of the subject.

3.2 Preparation of documents of practical activities: which will be delivered and analyzed in the classroom. These are practical cases proposed in advance by the teacher or the preparation of critical reviews of books and readings or files of jurisprudence, regulations, or films.

3.3 Search of bibliography, jurisprudence, and materials for the resolution of practical cases, complementing theoretical questions

3.4. Preparation of course work, reports, etc.

Attendance at seminars, except in justified cases, will be compulsory for students

The teaching methodology and the evaluation may have some modification depending on the circumstances and especially on the restrictions to the attendance established by the health authorities.

Attendance at the seminars, except in the case of justified cause, will be mandatory for students.

There may be changes of language in teaching due to unforeseen circumstances

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

Evaluation

The competences of these subjects will be evaluated continuously through the following activities:

- Final Exam to be carried out on the date officially indicated by the Academic Secretary. It will account for 50% of the final grade. The teaching team corresponding to each of the groups must indicate the format of this test, which in any case will be by examination (which can be divided into two parts, with 25% each).

- A minimum of two assessment activities with a minimum weight in the grade of the remaining 50%. 30% corresponds to the evaluation of the practical activities carried out in the seminar and 20% to the evaluation of other activities. For these purposes, in each of the groups of this subject, the respective teaching team must determine the evaluation activities. Examples of these possible activities, just to name a few, are: practical cases, reports, reviews, legal writings, opinions, preparation of research papers, reviews, book criticism, jurisprudence files, regulations, videos or films , or develop projects, among other activities. The selected activities can be carried out, as decided by the teaching team, individually or in groups.

- At the beginning of the course, the teaching team of each group will present the program of the subject foreseen in this guide, explaining the topics that will be discussed. In this way, it will also present the schedule of teaching activities (theory and seminars), specify the continuous evaluation system that it has selected and establish the percentage assigned to each of the selected activities and its date of completion, as well as the system for re-evaluation of the suspended activities. The reevaluation can only be carried out if the student has followed the continuous evaluation. Such indications will be exposed in the virtual campus/Moodle.

- Within these activities to be evaluated, the teaching team will also be able to assess attendance and participation in class. It is about active participation throughout the course, of quality, legally based,adequate and relevant to the topics covered, and different from that carried out in the seminar / practical classes. In this case, the teaching team of each group will determine the corresponding percentage.

- Students who copy or attempt to copy on a final exam will have a 0 on the exam. Students who present a practice in which there is plagiarism will obtain a 0 and receive a warning. In case of repetition of the conduct, the student will suspend the subject.

- Students will be assessable as long as they have completed a set of activities whose weight is equivalent to a minimum of 2/3 of the total grade for the subject. If the value of the activities carried out does not reach this threshold, the subject teacher may consider the student as not assessable.

- To pass the subject, students must achieve a minimum grade in the final overall test (5 points out of 10). In this case, if this minimum grade is not reached, the subject will be suspended. A minimum grade is not required to appear for the revaluation.

- Unique assessment. The teaching team of each group will establish the system and the unique assessment activities that will be applicable to the students who have requested and been granted this system. In any case, there will be a final exam, in which the delivery of other writings and activities can be added (50% corresponds to the evaluation of the final exam, 30% corresponds to the evaluation of the practical activities and 20% to the evaluation of other activities). Students who have taken the single assessment will only be entitled to the reassessment if they have obtained a grade equal to or higher than 3.5 points out of 10.

- Restricted use of AI. For this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted exclusively in support tasks, such as bibliographic or information research, text correction or translations. The student must clearly identify which parts have been generated with this technology, specify the tools used and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the result of the activity. The lack of transparency in the use of AI in this assessable activity will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may lead to a partial or total penalty in the grade of the activity, or greater sanctions in serious cases.

- In the event that the student copies, commits plagiarism or is discovered with a prohibited device in an evaluation test, the teaching staff will grade it with a 0 in this evaluation act, and will notify the Dean of the Faculty by presenting a report on the circumstances and evidence of the event that occurred to request the opening of a possible disciplinary file against the student. This assessment activity will not be recoverable. In the event that there is more than one irregularity in the evaluation acts of the same subject, the final grade of this subject is 0.