The student learning system consists of the synhesis of the following models.

- MASTER CLASS: The active participation of the student will enable the adequate understanding of the subject.

- STUDY BY THE STUDENT.

- RESOLUTION OF PRACTICAL CASES. It will consist in the resolution of practical cases extracted from the commercial praxis and related to each lesson or thematic block of the subject.

Transparency in the use of AI: For this subject, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies is allowed exclusively in support tasks such as information search, text correction, translations or information organization. The student must clearly identify the use he has made of AI, share with the teaching staff the interactions maintained with AI tools and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the final result of the activity. The lack of transparency in the use of AI in this assessable activity will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may lead to a partial or total penalty in the grade of the activity, or greater sanctions in serious cases

The evaluation system is organized based on the following learning evidences.

1. Written tests: The teacher will evaluate the degree of knowlwdge of content competencies theoretical by performing a first test with a value of 25% on the final grade and a second test that will represent 25% of the final grade of the student if it has exceeded the first and 50% in another case.

2 Continous evaluation of assignments:The resolution of practical cases and public presentations of practices and work will represent 50% of the final grade.

To pass the subject, the students will have to obtain a half mark of 5 points (or more than 5) between all the learning evidence.

For the exams to be computed in the calculation of the exam, it will be essential that the students have obtained a minimum grade of 3.5 in each exam.

NOT EVALUABLE: Student will be considered as \"not evaluable\" provided they do not take part in whatever exercise of evaluation.

Calendar of evaluation activities

The dates of the evaluation activities (midterm exams, exercises in the classroom, assignments, ...) will be announced well in advance during the semester.

The date of the final exam is scheduled in the assessment calendar of the Faculty.

\"The dates of evaluation activities cannot be modified, unless there is an exceptional and duly justified reason why an evaluation activity cannot be carried out. In this case, the degree coordinator will contact both the teaching staff and the affected student, and a new date will be scheduled within the same academic period to make up for the missed evaluation activity.\" Section 1 of Article 115. Calendar of evaluation activities (Academic Regulations UAB). Students of the Faculty of Economics and Business, who in accordance with the previous paragraph need to change anevaluation activity date must process the request by filling out an Application forexams' reschedulehttps://eformularis.uab.cat/group/deganat_feie/application-for-exams-reschedule

\"The review of the final qualification will follow the same procedure as for the continuous evaluation\".

Grade revision process

After all grading activities have ended, students will be informed of the date and way in which the course grades will be published. Students will be also be informed of the procedure, place, date and time of grade revision following University regulations.

Retake Process

\"To be eligible to participate in the retake process, it is required for students to have been previously been evaluated for at least two thirds of the total evaluation activities of the subject.\" Section 3 of Article 112 ter. The recovery (UAB Academic Regulations). Additionally, it is required that the student to have achieved an average grade of the subject between 3.5 and 4.8.

The date of the retake exam will be posted in the calendar of evaluation activities of the Faculty. Students who take this exam and pass, will get a grade of 5 for the subject. If the student does not pass the retake, the grade will remain unchanged, and hence, student will fail the course.

Students who, failing the second exam, obtain a grade that forces them to go to re-evaluation must take the entire subject exam even if they had passed the partial exam on the day. Therefore, in the reassessment, the entire subject must be examined.

This subject or module does not provide for a single assessment system

Irregularities in evaluation activities

In spite of other disciplinary measures deemed appropriate, and in accordance with current academic regulations, \"in the case that the student makes any irregularity that could lead to a significant variationin the grade of an evaluation activity, it will be graded with a 0, regardless of the disciplinary process thatcan be instructed. In case of various irregularities occur in the evaluation of the same subject, the final grade of this subject will be 0\". Section 10 of Article 116. Results of the evaluation. (UAB Academic Regulations).

The completion of assessment activities is subject to the provisions set out in this course guide and in the "Policy of the School of Economics and Business on the Detection of Irregularities during Assessment Activities", which regulates the conditions under which assessment tasks are conducted and the procedures applicable in cases where indications of irregularities are detected. Students are encouraged to consult the policy.