The methodology teaching will be on-site, face-to-face.

The teaching methodology is based on a combination of three types of activities:

• Guided activity: theoretical and practical resolution (analysis) of cases.
• Supervised activity: consisting attending tutorials and exercises with a ruled follow-up.
• Individual autonomous activity: students' personal study (study of basic bibliography, readings, research information, etc.).
• Group autonomous activity: data search and case studies. Discussion and oral presentation of the group work.

The course uses gamification as an innovative teaching methodology and challenge-based learning.

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

This subject does not offer the option for comprehensive evaluation.

Evaluation

The student assessment will be based on:

1. Class attendance and participation (15% of the mark).
2. Submission of oral and written work (25% of the mark).
3. Writen work (15%). If a team member does not take part, the score for this part will not be taken into account.
4. Oral defence (10%). If a team member does not attend the call, the score for this part will not be taken into account.
5. Submission of oral and written Kahoots's group (10% of the mark).If a team member does not attend the call, the score for this part will not be taken into account.
6. Compulsory Test, topics 1 to 4 (25% of the mark). The grade is computable if you get a score higher than 3,5 out of 10.
7. Final Test, topics 5 to 8 (25% of the mark).

To pass the course the student should get her an aggregate grade not less than 4.9 out of 10. Failure to attend the final exam, the compulsory test and the group work activities will result in a non-evaluable grade.

Calendar of evaluation activities

The dates of the evaluation activities (midterm exams, exercises in the classroom, assignments, ...) will be announced wellin advance during the semester.

The date of the final exam is scheduled in the assessment calendar of theFaculty.

\"Thedates of evaluation activities cannot be modified, unless there is an exceptional and duly justified reason why an evaluation activity cannot be carried out. In this case, the degree coordinator will contact both the teaching staff and the affected student, and a new date will be scheduled within the same academic period to make up for the missed evaluation activity.\" Section 1 of Article 115. Calendar of evaluation activities (Academic Regulations UAB). Students of the Faculty of Economics and Business, who in accordance with the previous paragraph need to change an evaluation activity date must process the request by filling out an Application for exams' reschedulehttps://eformularis.uab.cat/group/deganat_feie/application-for-exams-reschedule

Grade revision process

After all grading activities have ended, students will be informed of the date and way in which the course grades will be published. Students will be also be informed of the procedure, place, date and time of grade revision following University regulations.

Retake Process

\"To be eligible toparticipate in the retake process, it is required for students to have been previously been evaluated for at least two thirds of the total evaluation activities of the subject.\" Section 3 of Article 112 ter. The recovery (UAB Academic Regulations). Additionally, it is required that the student to have achieved an average grade of the subject between 3.5 and 4.8.

The date of the retake exam will be posted in the calendar of evaluation activities of the Faculty. Students who take thisexam and pass, will get a grade of 5 for the subject. If the student does not pass the retake, the grade willremain unchanged, and hence, student will fail the course.

Irregularities in evaluation activities

In spite of other disciplinary measures deemed appropriate, and in accordance with current academic regulations, \"in the case that the student makes any irregularity that could lead to a significant variation in the grade of an evaluation activity, it will be graded with a 0, regardless of the disciplinary process that can be instructed. In case of various irregularities occur in the evaluationof the same subject, the final grade of this subject will be 0\". Section 10 of Article 116. Results of the evaluation. (UAB Academic Regulations).

Non-assessable

According to point 9 of article 266 of the UAB Academic Regulations, when it is considered that the student has not been able to provide sufficient assessment evidence, this subject must be marked as non-assessable.

Use of AI

Restricted use: \"For this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted exclusively in [support tasks, such as bibliographic or information searches, proofreading, or translations... (other?) ....], [activities xxx] [other specific situations where considered], which must be clearly identified and include a critical reflection on how they have influenced the process and final result of the activity. Lack of transparency in the use of AI in this assessable activity will be considered academic dishonesty and may result in a partial or total penalty in the activity grade, or greater penalties in serious cases.\" The use of AI is not permitted in exams.

The completion of assessment activities is subject to the provisions set out in this course guide and in the "Policy of the School of Economics and Business on the Detection of Irregularities during Assessment Activities", which regulates the conditions under which assessment tasks are conducted and the procedures applicable in cases where indications of irregularities are detected. Students are encouraged to consult the policy.