Teaching language: Spanish

The students will have to prepare the subjects from the didactic units, the recommended readings and the documents (legislation and sentences) incorporated to the platform. They must carry out the practical exercises that are proposed and send the teacher the corresponding answers, reasoned and justified based on the reference documents.

Each didactic unit will have a file that will guide the student to perform these exercises. The sources that the student considers convenient for their resolution can be used and will be sent to the teacher, following the indications of the mentioned cards of each one of the teaching units.

Annotation: within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

ONGOING EVALUATION

The evaluation system will consist of the preparation and delivery of two ongoing evaluation (PAC) work on practical cases in the field of food safety which will be delivered to the moodle classroom.

Each of the tests (PAC) will have 50% of the total note value: 25% for each PEC. In order to be able to stand the final written test on food safety, it will be necessary to obtain at least an average of 5 out of the two tests (PECs) of 10 out of each.

Students will carry out an in-person written assessment of the subject. This written test on the content of the subject will have a value above the total note of 50%

RE-EVALUATION

In case of not passing the subject according to the aforementioned criteria (continuous evaluation), a recovery test may be done on the date scheduled in the schedule, and it will cover the entire contents of the program.

To participate in the reassessment the students must have been previously evaluated of a set of activities, the weight of which equals a minimum of two-thirds of the total grade of the subject. However, the qualification that will consist of the student's file is a maximum of 5-Approved.

Students who need to change an evaluation date must present the justified request by filling in the document that you will find in the moodle space of Tutorial EPSI.

SINGLE ASSESSMENT:

Students who opt for the single assessment will perform a final synthesis test of all assignment contents (50%) and submit an assignment job on a proposed practical case (50%).

The date for this assessment and submission of the assignment's work will be the same as the schedule for the last continuous assessment exam.

The same recovery system will be applied as for continuous evaluation.

STUDENT NOT EVALUABLE: Any student who has not taken at least 2/3 of the content of the total grade of the subject will be considered \"not evaluable\" andwill not be able to take the subject's recovery. . This same criterion will be applied in the case of the single evaluation.

PLAGIARISM

Without prejudice to other disciplinary measures deemed appropriate, and in accordance with current academic regulations, \"in the event that the student makes any irregularity that could lead to a significant variation in the grade of an evaluation act, it will be graded with a 0 This evaluation act, regardless of the disciplinary process that can be instructed In case of various irregularities occur in the evaluation acts of the same subject, the final grade of this subject will be 0 \".

The tests / exams may be written and / or oral at the discretion of the teaching staff.

Without prejudice to other disciplinary measures deemed appropriate, in accordance with current academic regulations, irregularities committed by a student that may lead to a variation of the grade will be scored with a zero (0). For example, plagiarizing, copying, letting copy, ..., an evaluation activity will imply suspending this evaluation activity with a zero (0). The evaluation activities qualified in this way and by this procedure will not be recoverable. If it is necessary to pass any of these evaluation activities to pass the subject, this subject will be suspended directly, without the opportunity to recover it in the same course.

If during the correction there are indications that an activity or work has been done with answers assisted by artificial intelligence, the teacher may supplement the activity with a personal interview to corroborate the authorship of the text.

Use of IA

In this subject, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is allowed as an integral part of the development of the work, provided that the result reflects a significant contribution of the student in the analysis and personal reflection. The student must clearly identify which partshave been generated with this technology, specify the tools used and include a critical reflection on how these have influenced the process and the result of the activity. The lack of transparency in the use of AI will be considered a lack of academic honesty and may lead to a penalty in the grade of the activity, greater sanctions in cases of seriousness.